Prince Charles was mired in controversy on Wednesday after he reportedly compared the actions of Russian President Vladimir Putin in Ukraine to those of Adolf Hitler.
The heir to the throne made the apparently unguarded comment during a trip to a museum in Canada, in conversation with a Polish-born woman who had fled the Nazis as a child.
“I had finished showing him the exhibit and talked with him about my own family background and how I came to Canada,” Marienne Ferguson told Britain’s Daily Mail newspaper.
“The prince then said: ‘And now Putin is doing just about the same as Hitler’.”
Ferguson, now 78, moved to Canada with her Jewish family when she was 13. She lost relatives in the Holocaust.
“I must say that I agree with him and am sure a lot of people do,” she told the newspaper.
But she added: “I was very surprised that he made the comment as I know they (the royal family) aren’t meant to say these things, but it was very heartfelt and honest.”
The remark made headlines around the world, and Russian media said it threatened to further “complicate” relations between Britain and Moscow.
The future king and Putin are both attending commemorations marking the 70th anniversary of D-Day on June 6th, although royal aides said no formal meeting was scheduled.
The prince’s office would not confirm his remarks but said he would not have intended to make a political statement.
“We do not comment on private conversations. But we would like to stress that the Prince of Wales would not seek to make a public political statement during a private conversation,” it said.
– ‘Seen and not heard’ –
Ferguson met the prince as he and his wife Camilla conducted a tour of the Canadian Museum of Immigration in Halifax, Nova Scotia, as part of a four-day trip to Canada.
She gave a similar account of their conversation to the BBC, but said it was “just a little remark, I didn’t think it was going to make such a big uproar”.
Members of the royal family by convention do not comment on political affairs, and Queen Elizabeth II is famous for keeping her own counsel.
However, her 65-year-old son Charles has come under criticism in the past for his outspoken remarks about everything from genetically modified food to architecture.
Opposition Labour lawmaker Mike Gapes, a member of the House of Commons foreign affairs committee, said the royals “should be seen and not heard”.
“If Prince Charles wants to make controversial statements on national or international issues, he should abdicate and stand for election,” he said on Twitter.
However, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said the prince was “free to express himself”.
– ‘Complicating UK-Russia relations’ –
There was no immediate official reaction in Moscow to his remarks, but the popular daily Moskovsky Komsomolets said the timing was “badly chosen” ahead of the D-Day event.
On its website, it also said the remarks “risk triggering an international scandal and complicate the already clouded relations between Great Britain and Russia”.
Ties between London and Moscow were plunged into deep freeze following the 2006 murder of Alexander Litvinenko, a Russian dissident, in London.
Relations began to improve in 2011, but the crisis over Ukraine has led to fresh tensions as the United States and the EU imposed sanctions on Russia for its intervention in the former Soviet state.
A spokeswoman for Britain’s Foreign Office told AFP that “it is not for us to comment” on the prince’s remarks.
Former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton made a similar comparison at a private event in March, according to a local newspaper report.
Describing Moscow’s intervention in Crimea following the ousting of the pro-Russian president in Kiev and its insistence that it was simply protecting Russian speakers, Clinton said: “If this sounds familiar, it’s what Hitler did back in the 30s.”
Russia’s subsequent annexation of Crimea set off the worst diplomatic crisis in the West’s relations with Moscow since the end of the Cold War.
WATCH: Bob Woodward grilled on HBO about Trump supporters being disconnected from reality on COVID
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Bob Woodward was taken to task for failing to warn Americans that Donald Trump's public statements on coronavirus were the exact opposite of what he actually believed.
Axios reporter Jonathan Swan interviewed Woodwood on "Axios on HBO" for an episode that aired on Monday.
Swan noted Woodward recorded Trump admitting that COVID was dangerous on March 19th, but instead of immediately warning America by publishing the bombshell, he saved it for his book Rage -- which was published on September 15th.
Woodward claimed that the world already knew the facts on coronavirus by the 19th of March, but Swan pushed back and pointed out that many of Trump's supporters ignore reality and instead trust Trump -- even when his views are not backed up by science or reality.
‘It was all a hoax’: NYT destroys Trump’s claims of business success — in second blockbuster on his taxes
President Donald Trump's tax returns have resulted in a second bombshell story by The New York Times.
"From the back seat of a stretch limousine heading to meet the first contestants for his new TV show “The Apprentice,” Donald J. Trump bragged that he was a billionaire who had overcome financial hardship. 'I used my brain, I used my negotiating skills and I worked it all out,” he told viewers. “Now, my company is bigger than it ever was and stronger than it ever was.' It was all a hoax," the newspaper reported Monday evening.
Trump campaign accused of ‘laundering’ 170 million — companies linked to Brad Parscale are implicated: report
The Trump campaign may be in legal hot water after a new complaint accused the organization of money laundering.
"The Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan campaign finance watchdog group, filed a complaint with the Federal Elections Commission Tuesday accusing the Trump campaign of “laundering” $170 million through numerous companies, some with connections to former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale," Forbes reported Monday.