Quantcast
Connect with us

Mass. Christian college facing review after requesting right to discriminate against gays

Published

on

A Massachusetts Christian college that is asking the government to allow it to discriminate against LGBT people is now facing review by a regional accreditation board.

The Boston Business Journal reported over the weekend that Gordon College’s attempt to skirt federal anti-discrimination laws by claiming religious exemption has earned the school a position on the New England Association of Schools and Colleges’ agenda at its next meeting.

ADVERTISEMENT

Gordon College President D. Michael Lindsay was among 15 Christian leaders who penned a letter to the Obama administration earlier this month in which they reasoned that under the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the Hobby Lobby case, their institutions should be exempt from federal anti-LGBT discrimination laws.

Gordon College, Lindsay argued, is an “explicitly Christian institution,” and as such, should be allowed to fire LGBT employees on the basis of their orientation, or to refuse to hire them at all with impunity.

In June, the Supreme Court ruled that Hobby Lobby — a Christian-owned chain of craft supply stores — is within the law in denying women workers the ability to pay for birth control with their employee health insurance. To allow women employees to do so, Hobby Lobby’s owners argued, would violate the owners’ religious beliefs, and therefore is beyond the government’s ability to enforce.

Now, the New England Association of Schools and Colleges’ Commission on Institutions of Higher Education is stepping in and will attempt to determine at its meeting on Sep. 17 and 18 whether Gordon College is violating the commission’s nondiscrimination policies, even if it manages to evade federal laws.

“There’s considerable publicity about the whole issue, and it’s been getting a lot of attention,” said commission director Barbara E. Brittingham to the Boston Globe. “It’s a matter of looking at the information we have and deciding if the institution is meeting our standards.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The commission’s standards and policies statement says that accredited institutions must follow “non-discriminatory policies and practices in recruitment, admissions, employment, evaluation, disciplinary action, and advancement.” Furthermore, institutions must be willing to accommodate “people of diverse characteristics and backgrounds.”

If the commission sees fit, Gordon College could lose its academic accreditation, although institutions rarely receive that punishment, the harshest that the commission can dole out.

Lindsay’s letter sparked an immediate backlash among students and faculty at Gordon College. A petition signed by 3,500 people demanded that Lindsay remove his name from the group letter and rescind his request.

ADVERTISEMENT

Juwan Campbell, a senior at Gordon, worried to the Globe that Lindsay’s decision to sign on to the exemption request will damage the college’s reputation.

“We’re not going to look like a very progressive school,” Campbell said. “It’s going to be difficult for people to find value in a Gordon degree going forward.”

ADVERTISEMENT

[official portrait of Pres. D. Michael Lindsay via Gordon.edu]


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Donald Trump sounds like a complete lunatic because he’s isolated himself in a far-right media bubble

Published

on

Welcome to another edition of What Fresh Hell?, Raw Story’s roundup of news items that might have become controversies under another regime, but got buried – or were at least under-appreciated – due to the daily firehose of political pratfalls, unhinged tweet storms and other sundry embarrassments coming out of the current White House.

If you have an older relative who spends way too much time stewing in the conservative media, you may have experienced a moment when you not only disagreed with him, but you realized that you had no earthly clue what he was going on about. Perhaps it was when he started talking about the UN plot to eliminate golf courses and replace paved roads with bicycle paths. Maybe he stopped you in your tracks with a discourse on why flies were attracted to Barack Obama, or complained about the government insisting on referring to Christians as "Easter-worshippers" or expressed outrage over 9/11 hijackers being given leniency by Muslim jurists.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump’s claim impeachment ‘nullifies’ 2016 election blown up in new House Judiciary Committee report

Published

on

On Saturday, the House Judiciary Committee released their report outlining the offenses committed by President Donald Trump, and the legal framework for impeachment — which clears the way for Congress to write and approve articles of impeachment against him.

One of the key issues examined by the report is the claim, repeatedly made by the president and his supporters, that impeachment would "nullify" the 2016 presidential election and the popular will — which is already a weak claim given that Trump never won the popular vote, and that impeaching Trump would still install Mike Pence as president. But the report more broadly rejects the entire claim that an election result immunizes a president from punishment for official misconduct.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

READ IT: House Judiciary Committee releases report defining Trump impeachable offenses

Published

on

On Saturday, the House Judiciary Committee released a report outlining the impeachable acts committed by President Donald Trump.

"Our President holds the ultimate public trust," said the report, titled "Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment," in its introduction. "A President faithful only to himself—who will sell out democracy and national security for his own personal advantage—is a danger to every American. Indeed, he threatens America itself."

The report clarifies the procedures for impeachment, analyzes whether president can be "impeached for abuse of executive powers," and "whether it is preferable to await the next election when a President has sought to corrupt that very same election."

Continue Reading