Quantcast
Connect with us

Fox News is drumming up hate against single women, particularly if they vote

Published

on

Ah, Media Matters is getting under the skin at Fox News again. Fox has been really hammering at young, single women in recent months, pushing the idea—rather unsubtly—that they’re a bunch of no-count sluts who will bring this country down because they’re too busy fucking and not busy being brought to heel with a nice, woman-taming marriage, preferably with oodles of babies to keep your feminine hands from getting idle and then getting into the devil’s work. Media Matters flagged a particularly egregious example, here:

Transcript:

GUILFOYLE: Right, that’s the thing, but when you’re young like that you think – the same reason why young women on juries are not a good idea – they don’t get it. They’re not in that same like, life experience of paying the bills, doing the mortgage, kids, community, crime, education, health care. They’re like healthy and hot and running around without a care in the world.

BECKEL: They’ve got every right in the world to be – what do you mean they shouldn’t be on jury duty? They’ve got every right in the world.

GUILFOYLE: I didn’t say they shouldn’t be, I just thank and excuse them so they can go back on Tinder or Match.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Really, it was the complete package: Accusing single women of being dumb, implying that they’re bad people because they have too much sex, and recommending marriage and babies as a way to bring them to heel. The only thing she forgot was cats. Bimbo or beleaguered housewives: On Fox News, those are the only two things a woman can be.

The excuse that the team on The Five brought after getting called out for this nonsense was that it was all taken out of context. This is a lie. Or, if you want to be generous, if by “out of context” you mean that they reported that Guilfoyle was saying they aren’t fit to sit juries without noting that she was making a larger point about how they’re not fit to vote, either, okay. But all the coverage I saw understood that she generally was suggesting single women should self-exclude from civic duties altogether.

I have a feeling that single women aren’t really a good demographic for Fox News, so this can’t really be understood as a direct attempt to discourage women from voting. (It would probably backfire anyway.) It’s more trying to encourage their older, more likely to be married audience to see single women as the enemy. Basically, you provoke a sexist anxiety in your audience—those hot young women are running around having fun while poor oppressed you has a mortgage to pay—and then offer a way to show those bitches what’s what, by voting Republican. Never mind that the percentage of single women who really are “running around without a care in the world” was reduced to a zero after Kim Kardashian got married. Single women are a diverse group, to say the least, coming in all ages and income levels (except the very richest, which tends to be male-centric). Some are mothers, some aren’t.

But even if you are a relatively privileged young woman who has lots of free time and money for Tinder dating, that doesn’t mean you don’t have a care in the world. Odds are you’re still underpaid and you likely live in an expensive city where meeting your financial obligations is no walk in the park. You’re probably saddled with student debt and you may be dependent on Obamacare to get health care if you’re part of the freelance generation. On top of that, you still have all the same old worries that plague a lot of women, simply by being women: Subtle sexual discrimination, sexual harassment, even domestic and sexual violence.

Also, for those people who forget, dating, even with Tinder, is no walk in the park. It’s just there’s no real political solution for that, so it’s something of a non sequitur anyway.

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Pandagon

Ch-ch-changes…..

Published

on

After many years and many server changes and finally landing here at Raw Story, which has taken very good care of us, it's time to say goodbye to Pandagon. I've been blogging under this banner for ten years, after Jesse Taylor asked me to join. He, in turn, had been running this joint since he was in college. A lot has changed since then. I became a journalist, moved from Austin to New York and learned to play Dungeons & Dragons. Jesse became a lawyer and, just this past weekend, a married man.

Continue Reading

Pandagon

Carly Fiorina defends her lie with a whole bunch of lies

Published

on

I do like it when Republican candidates sport a resume full of corporate executive work, because it really shows the public how many fools and idiots coast into that position not on merit but on their bullshitting abilities. Donald Trump, Herman Cain, and now we have Carly Fiorina, who just can't understand why her perceived underlings (voters, journalists) won't scurry away, pretending to accept her bullshit like former employees of hers had to do, lest they lost their jobs.

And so it goes that Fiorina, who could make this entire Planned Parenthood controversy go away by saying something like, "I may have misremembered the video, but I still think abortion is wrong," instead is doubling and tripling down. And every time she does, she lies more and more. She was on Meet the Press and, so enamored of the idea that she is perfect and could never do anything wrong, just went to town with the defensive posturing.

Continue Reading
 

Pandagon

Marco Rubio has an astoundingly low opinion of women’s intelligence

Published

on

At RH Reality Check, I covered this story that I wish was getting more press, about how Marco Rubio goes back and forth between suggesting that women who get abortions are greedy monsters who get pregnant for cash:

I just think you’ve created an industry now … a situation where very much, you’ve created an incentive for people not just to look forward to having more abortions, but being able to sell that fetal tissue for purposes—these centers—for purposes of making a profit off it, as you’ve seen in some of these Planned Parenthood affiliates.

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH 

Trump endorses killing journalists, like Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi. Online ad networks are now targeting sites that cover acts of violence against dissidents, LGBTQ people and people of color.

Learn how you can help.
close-link