Quantcast
Connect with us

#Pointergate mayor mocks police officials with epic blog smackdown

Published

on

Minneapolis police officials still smarting over the ridicule heaped upon them over #pointergate last week, took another blast today from the subject of their ridiculous accusation: Mayor Betsy Hodges.

Writing on her blog about the incident, where police officials — including the police union head John Delmonico — claimed she was “flashing” gang signs with a local gang member while out canvassing for votes, Hodges ridiculed the police while questioning their motives.

ADVERTISEMENT

Police officials have already taken a beating in the national media, with Daily Show host Jon Stewart giving the officials a ‘one finger salute,’ however Hodges had held her fire until now.

On her blog, the mayor admitted that the photo-op with a volunteer was “awkward,” before questioning police officials assertions that allowing the picture to be taken while she and the volunteer pointed at each was “poor judgment on my part,” with Delmonico asking, “Is she on the side of the cops or the gangs?”

Asking, “what the head of the police union thinks I should do, or not do,” Hodges laid out four options.

“First, maybe the head of the police union would like me to stop pointing altogether for the safety of the community. If that were truly his concern, that my pointing constitutes gang activity, then his outrage would have been sparked long, long ago,” she wrote, before adding ” Lots of people point. The President. Bill Clinton. Stephen Colbert. Babies. It is the earliest form of human communication. I’m not going to stop pointing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Saying that was not an option, Hodges said “maybe the head of the police union wants me to refrain from being in the presence of people whose criminal history I don’t know. In other words, maybe the head of the police union doesn’t want me interacting with the public.”

Hodges explained that she would have no way of knowing if someone had a criminal history before stating, “Frankly, if I did know that someone had a criminal past, it wouldn’t prevent me from talking with that person. It certainly wouldn’t prevent me from working on a Get Out The Vote drive with that person.”

The third option, she said, was “the head of the police union doesn’t want me standing next to young African American men.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“One frightening implication of the KSTP story and police union President Delmonico’s support of that story is their implicit assumption that I should use stereotypes to assess with whom I should or should not meet or stand or talk,” Hodges wrote. “As The Onion once satirically wrote, ‘Stereotypes are a real time saver.’ It is not a good basis for decision-making, however.”

Hodges went on to suggest the real reason the police objected to the picture was ” … the head of the police union wants me to stop working to raise the standards of police culture and accountability,” and wanted to use the hyped-up story to discredit her.

“I share the public’s speculation that this is the real option,” she wrote. “If that is the case, he has failed on two levels. First, the people of the internet have called out this story over and over with outrage and humor, shining the light of day on the ridiculous premise on which it was based.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“I am undaunted in my desire to support and develop police officers who serve respectfully and collaboratively every day to keep people safe and make all our neighborhoods stronger. I am undaunted in my plans to increase accountability for consistent bad actors in the police department.”

Hodges went on to state that she didn’t think this would be the last time the police union would attempt to undermine her.

“If the fourth option is correct, my commitment to this work means that the head of the police union or other detractors will pitch more stories that attempt to defame that work and its leaders to various media outlets. So be it,” she concluded.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

GOP’s cancellation of presidential primaries could blow up in Trump’s face — here’s why

Published

on

In recent weeks, Republican state party committees have been moving to cancel presidential primaries to prevent Never-Trump conservatives, like former Reps. Joe Walsh (R-IL) and Mark Sanford (R-SC) and former Gov. Bill Weld (R-MA), from challenging the president from the right. So far, Republicans in Arizona, Kansas, Nevada, and South Carolina have all announced they will scrap the voting process for 2020.

Continue Reading

Alternet 2020

Nancy Pelosi faces serious challenges — but she’s failed miserably in two key ways

Published

on

As I wrote earlier this week, with its muddled messaging on impeachment, the House Democratic leadership may have figured out a way of both demoralizing the Democratic base and firing up Trump's supporters. It's a mess.

But fairness requires us to acknowledge an important fact: Speaker Nancy Pelosi doesn't have the votes to launch an official impeachment process. And it's not close. At present, The Washington Post's tally finds 137 members of the House in favor of launching an impeachment inquiry, with 92 opposed and 6 others not taking a position. Leadership can twist arms on a close vote, but when you're close to 100 votes shy of a majority, it's impossible to whip a measure across the finish line--especially one of such consequence.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump’s anti-worker labor nominee is more like the ‘Secretary of Corporate Interests’

Published

on

Progressive groups and Democratic lawmakers expressed serious concerns Thursday about corporate attorney Eugene Scalia — President Donald Trump's pick to lead the Labor Department — as the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee met to consider his nomination.

"Instead of nominating a Secretary of Labor, President Trump has nominated a Secretary of Corporate Interests," declared Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the committee's ranking member. "If there's one consistent pattern in Mr. Scalia's long career, it's hostility to the very workers he would be charged with protecting, and the very laws he would be charged with enforcing if he were confirmed."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Investigate and Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image