Quantcast
Connect with us

Reefer madness: Prosecutors mentioned Mike Brown’s pot use 44 times in grand jury hearings

Published

on

Prosecutors seeking an indictment against police officer Darren Wilson repeatedly questioned witnesses about victim Michael Brown’s marijuana usage, bringing it up 44 times in grand jury questioning, reports the St. Louis Dispatch.

One of the construction workers who spoke with Brown before the shooting told St. Louis Police investigators  that part of his conversation with Brown involved “waxing,” a process that uses the sticky resin or tar that comes from marijuana and is either ingested or smoked because of its higher THC levels. According to the witness, he asked Brown if he had ever tried it, but Brown denied knowing about the procedure.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite the witnesses’ testimony, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Kathi Alizadeh repeatedly asked other witnesses about possible waxing by Brown, with one detective admitting he wasn’t familiar with the process.

Dorian Johnson, who was with Brown when he died, confirmed the waxing conversation Brown had had with the worker, however he denied that Brown had consumed any marijuana that day.

According to a toxicology report, Brown had 12 nanograms of THC per milliliter of blood in his system, with the chief toxicologist for St. Louis County saying it  would take a lot of marijuana to get a 300-pound person to the level.

“In a small person, say like 100 pounds, to get to 12 nanograms wouldn’t take a lot,” the toxicologist said. “A single joint could easily do that. But when you talk about a larger body mass, just like drinking alcohol, larger persons can drink more alcohol because they have the receptacle to hold it.”

Despite repeated questioning by Alizadeh, no witness — including the chief toxicologist — was able to link Brown to waxing outside of the conversation he had  with the worker.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr. Michael Baden, a private pathologist retained by the Brown family, disputed that Brown had a large amount of THC in his body, telling jurors Brown had a “relative small amount, and how it affects somebody varies.”

“It doesn’t make people go crazy,” he said. “So toxicology, everything it has and everything it doesn’t have has significance, and in this instance, I think marijuana is significant that he smoked marijuana, but 99 out of 100 people taking marijuana aren’t going to get in a fight with a police officer over it, in my experience.”

Alizadeh then questioned Baden three times if he was a toxicologist, twice if he was a pharmacologist, twice if he has been certified as an expert in toxicology, and once if he has been certified as an expert in pharmacology.

ADVERTISEMENT

Baden said he wasn’t a toxicologist but had expertise in interpreting toxicology reports as a medical examiner, adding that he ran a toxicology lab in New York City for five years.

Despite the lack of evidence linking Brown with waxing, prosecutors again mentioned it again on the final day of testimony, Nov. 21, while acknowledging  that police had found no evidence that Brown had gotten wax from the workers.

ADVERTISEMENT

 


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

House Republicans have 3 key defenses of Trump’s Ukraine extortion campaign — and they’re all terrible

Published

on

To any halfway objective observer, the first day of public hearings in House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry, which are ongoing as of this writing, have not gone well for Trump’s defenders.

Bill Taylor, the top US ambassador in Kyiv, and veteran State Department official George Kent came off as principled and non-partisan as they delivered damning testimony about the Trump regime’s multifaceted campaign to coerce the Ukrainian government to announce an investigation into fringe right-wing conspiracy theories designed to deflect blame for interfering in the 2016 election from Russia and onto Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Progressives hilariously ridicule Donald Trump Jr.’s new book with their own Trump triggers #TriggerDonaldTrumpJr

Published

on

President Donald Trump's eldest child and namesake has published a book about liberals he says are "triggered" by conservatives. Ironically, it seems Donald Trump Jr. is the one who seems to be triggered by the reception he's getting from some on his book tour.

The hashtag, #TriggerDonaldTrumpJr has nothing to do with Jr's new book, rather it's progressives using his book title to mock the Trump child. Internet users were torn between mocking the young Trump for desperately trying to get his father's attention, scrambling to seem relevant, trying to launch his own political career, trying to make his own money and so much more.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Blather and hysteria’: Conservative columnist explains why GOP anti-impeachment ‘antics’ just crashed and burned

Published

on

devin nunes defeat

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Rep. Devin Nunes of California and other House Republicans were clearly trying to rally the Trumpian base on Wednesday, when the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump offered its first public testimony. Jordan and Nunes aggressively tried to discredit the inquiry and the two witnesses who testified: diplomat William B. Taylor (U.S. ambassador to Ukraine) and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George P. Kent. But conservative Washington Post opinion writer Jennifer Rubin, in a Wednesday column, stressed that House Republicans — for all their “antics and conspiracy theories” — failed to show why Trump shouldn’t be impeached, while House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff and other House Democrats showed why he should.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image