Quantcast
Connect with us

Arkansas bill gives businesses the right to refuse to serve LGBT customers

Published

on

When Arizona lawmakers wanted businesses to be able to choose whether to serve LGBT customers based on the religious convictions of their owners, there was a national outcry. Especially, it seemed, from the business community.

The National Football League threatened to move the Super Bowl. The Arizona Cardinals football team sent a letter condemning the law. Wells Fargo, Apple, Bank of America, Marriott and American Express all criticized the bill .

In Michigan, an analogous act met the same fate. Business leaders who had originally come together to add LGBT protections to the state’s civil rights law ended up fighting against a religious freedom bill introduced in response.

“By not having inclusive policies we’re contributing to brain-drain,” said Sommer Foster, director of political advocacy at Equality Michigan. “We were able to get a number of CEOs to sign on and say discrimination doesn’t represent Michigan values.”

But now in Arkansas, where a bill to stop municipalities from passing ordinances to protect the LGBT community is almost certain to become law, national business leaders are keeping mum.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s been pretty quiet so far, unfortunately,” said Laura Phillips, board member and advocacy chair at the Northwest Arkansas Center for Equality, a small nonprofit based in Fayetteville, about the reaction from the business community. “It’s frankly kind of distressing that there’s been that much silence.”

In Arkansas, a governor neither has to sign or veto legislation for it to become law – if the governor takes no action for five days, the bill is considered approved. This, governor Asa Hutchinson has said, is the path he will take.

LGBT leaders are attempting to organize against the governor’s inaction, gathering signatures and urging constituents to call and email the governor’s office, but they say the silence from business leaders is conspicuous.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are just really surprised,” said Lamont Richie, president of the Eureka Springs Gay Business Guild, about what is perceived among activists as a failure on Walmart’s part to speak up. The retail giant is the state’s largest employer and a vocal proponent of LGBT rights. The company has a strong internal anti-discrimination policy, and has sponsored events like the New York City Pride parade . “I don’t know what’s happening in back rooms – I wish I was privy to that.”

The Arkansas state chamber of commerce has also refused to comment.

While Arizona’s chamber of commerce and industry condemned that state legislature’s attempt to codify a religious freedom bill, the Arkansas state chamber of commerce CEO relayed a message to the Guardian through a secretary: the chamber has no opinion.

ADVERTISEMENT

Walmart did not respond to requests for comment.

Arkansas is not unique in its failure to protect the LGBT community from housing and employment discrimination. (It is the latter that typically draws criticism from the business community, which says such laws hinder attempts to attract talent.)

In all, 29 states don’t protect members of the LGBT community through anti-discrimination statutes. The failure is one of omission. Unless states spell out protections on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, there are none.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the face of states’ failure to act, more than 200 municipalities across the country have passed anti-discrimination ordinances. Most recently, a West Virginia town of just five residents agreed to enact such an ordinance.

And in Arkansas the same phenomenon was happening. The Fayetteville city council may have inadvertently inspired the bill with a non-discrimination ordinance it passed – local LGBT leaders say the state bill’s sponsor, Republican state senator Bart Hester , commented on the Fayetteville ordinance even though the center of his district is more than 120 miles away . (Voters repealed Fayetteville’s ordinance by referendum last December, but that didn’t deter Hester.)

The state senator fast-tracked the law, part of an effort to ensure that the LGBT community did not have “special rights that I do not have”, Hester told BuzzFeed News. The bill now sitting on Hutchinson’s desk was less than two weeks old when it was passed by both houses of the Arkansas general assembly.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Any time a state legislature makes a special effort to squash the ability of a local community to say that it doesn’t want to discriminate against the LGBT community, I think that’s a pretty astounding political statement,” said Rebecca Isaacs, executive director of the Equality Foundation.

“Senate Bill 202 passed with significant margins in the General Assembly, and I have a high regard for the discussion in the legislature and respect for the legislative process,” Hutchinson told the Arkansas Times in a statement. “As Governor, I recognize the desire to prevent burdensome regulations on businesses across the state. However, I am concerned about the loss of local control. For that reason, I am allowing the bill to become law without my signature.”

The bill was altered only to remove an “emergency” provision that would have made it effective immediately upon approval. Now, if the bill becomes law, it will take effect 90 days after the legislative session ends. That’s likely to be sometime this summer because the Arkansas legislature often extends its session.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eureka Springs claims to have the only active LGBT anti-discrimination ordinance in the state, though LGBT activists said they are attempting to inspire others to pass similar laws.

“I have yet to receive one contact from the chamber of commerce, or any business in the area, asking any questions about the ordinance,” said Richie, one of the Eureka Springs ordinance’s architects and strongest proponents. “It’s rather disturbing but at the same time.

“It’s not surprising – this is Arkansas.”

ADVERTISEMENT

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2015


Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump raked over the coals by WSJ for ‘politically stupid’ racist comments debacle

Published

on

In a brutally blunt column from the conservative editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, the editors scolded Donald Trump for being "politically stupid" by wading into a dispute between factions within the Democratic Party that has blown up in his face.

Under a headline reading, "Defining Politics Down," the editorial seemed less concerned with Trump's racist attacks and more with the fact that he has made his racism front and center as the country gears up for the 2020 election.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Dear NeverTrumpers: Either help or STFU

Published

on

Bill Kristol Max Boot David Frum
Over the past few weeks, you may have noticed that the NeverTrumpers — repentant Republicans and conservatives — have been offering up lots of advice for how the Democrats can win the next election. Their jackhammer advice has basically been limited to urging the party to disavow its activist, progressive members in order to secure the contrarian swing voters who cast ballots for Barack Obama twice, then switched to Donald Trump in 2016.

Before I offer up a come-to-Jesus moment for the NeverTrumpers, let me say that as many of you know, I’ve defended members of this exiled faction in the past, and continue to stand by the idea that we need to form a coalition to close the loopholes exposed by Donald Trump’s malfeasance as a means of preventing another, perhaps more dangerous monster from sashaying through the Trump-shaped hole in the wall. To be clear: I’m not talking about conceding on policy or platform planks. I’m merely suggesting a detente between voices who all agree that Trump is a menace and his presidency is an existential national crisis.

Continue Reading
 

DC Report

News flash: Trump’s no racist!

Published

on

The gap that Donald Trump continually shows us between word and deed is remarkable. He lets words hurt while ignoring the substance of what the words mean.

That public words that various people, from both in and out of government or politics, say about him seem to matter a whole lot more than actual events, scandals or bad governmental behavior reflecting on his presidency. We’re used to it by now, numb really, so, it seems useful to step back and look at the pattern.

Even so, his tweets on Sunday telling four rebellious first-year congresswomen, citizens who are all of color, that they should return to where they came from “to go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came” is an insult that crosses all borders. As it happens, three of the four are American-born, and Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Mich.) has been a naturalized citizen since age 12.

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

close-image