An Oregon pediatrician who claims his anti-vaccination position is responsible for the fact that none of his patients are on the autism spectrum spoke at a public hearing on the merits of Senate Bill 442, which would remove the religious and philosophical exemptions to vaccination in the state.
In a video preface to his testimony he posted on YouTube, Dr. Paul Thomas said that “we are going to be mandated to do whatever the state wants, and of course, it’s going to be all vaccines for all kids at all times. You’ll only be able to get a medical exemption from certain pre-selected medical providers.”
“This is a travesty,” he said. “We need to preserve the right for freedom of choice. Isn’t that what it’s all about for doctors anyway? Giving the ‘pros’ and the ‘cons’? Because one of the alternatives for vaccines is doing nothing.”
In his testimony, he introduced himself by noting that he “represents about 11,000 patients and 500 babies each month come to my practice wanting informed consent about vaccine. As a physician, it is my responsibility to give an assessment of the risks and benefits of all procedures, and we’re not going to be allowed to do this if this bill passes — and that’s a tragedy.”
After a brief discussion about the presence of aluminum in the Hepatitis B vaccine, Dr. Thomas claimed that in his practice, of the 1,000 children over 3 years old that he treats, there have been no new cases of autism.
“At the rate of 1 in 50 [children on the autism spectrum] that my peers are experiencing, I should have had 20 cases. At the rate of 1 in 50, we have 80,000 new cases a year,” he continued, saying that if mothers opted out of vaccination, it could be “reduced by 76,000.”
On a blog post he wrote about his testimony, Thomas complained about the rules and procedures at the hearing.
“As I listened to senator after senator and doctors in favor of this bill (who all got unlimited time to testify) say that basically vaccines are safe (a lie) and how horrible the world will become if we don’t pass this bill (totally unnecessary fear mongering) you need to know that I was then told (my group onward) that we had a 3 minute time limit,” he wrote.
“Parents,” he continued, “just because it is not you getting that toxic dose (immunization) don’t get lazy on your duty to first protect your child. It is sad that in this case most of my peers are on the wrong side of science and the facts, but they are so you must leave your doctor if that is what it will take to protect your child.”
Thomas then assured his patients that even if the bill becomes a law, they need not fear — “I will find a way to get you a medical exemption if that is what it comes to.”
Watch his testimony before the Senate committee below.
Presiding House Dem bangs gavel and quits after GOP throws a fit over Pelosi calling Trump’s tweet racist
A House Speaker's words have not been taken down from the record since 1984, but Tuesday, Republicans waged a war against Speaker Nancy Pelosi for having the temerity to call President Donald Trump's recent tweets racist.
Trump told four Congresswomen of color to go back to the country they came from. Democrats sought to pass a resolution saying that the tweets were "disgusting, disparaging and racist," but Republicans said doing so violates House rules.
After an hour of discussion between the two parties, a frustrated Congressman Rev. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO), acting as the chiar, responded.
GOP strategist Tara Setmayer says Republicans will defend Trump until he uses the N-word
Republican strategist Tara Setmayer told a CNN panel that the only way the GOP is going to be willing to stand up to President Donald Trump is if he uses the N-word.
In a panel discussion with CNN's Jake Tapper, Setmayer said that the Republicans in office will bend over backward trying to defend everything the president says and does.
"I think we’re at the point where I think anything short of the N-word they will make excuses for because at that point there is really no question about it, right?" she said. "So, it is obvious to everyone else, it is amazing to me how many of the Republicans are going out there and I said this yesterday, try to white-splain to people of color what racism is and what it feels like to deal with that every single day."
GOP congressman demands Pelosi’s House floor statement be ‘taken down’ after she denounces Trump’s racist tweets
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Tuesday took to the floor of Congress to read a statement denouncing President Donald Trump's recent statements telling four congresswomen of color to go back to their home country.
"The comments are racist," Pelosi said. "How shameful to hear him continue to defend the offensive words. Words we have heard him repeat not only about our members but about countless others. Our caucus will continue to forcefully respond on these attacks which reflect a fundamental disrespect for the beautiful diversity of America. There’s no place anywhere for the president’s words which are not only divisive but dangerous and have legitimatized an increased fear and hatred of new Americans and people of color."