Quantcast
Connect with us

Ashley Judd’s harassers are an embarrassment to the art of sh*t talk

Published

on

As much as I am sick of men who think having a dick is the same thing as having a logical argument, I am doubly sick of men who mistake unimaginative misogyny for shit talk. Men who confuse the two are all over this story about Ashley Judd getting abused on Twitter during March Madness because she, as a supporter of Kentucky, was throwing out actual shit talk about her team’s competitors. Her description of events:

ADVERTISEMENT

During a conference championship game on Sunday, I posted a comment to Twitter that some found unsportsmanlike. I didn’t much care for three players bleeding on the court, and I tweeted that the opponent was “playing dirty & can kiss my team’s free throw making a—.” The volume of hatred that exploded at me in response was staggering.

I routinely cope with tweets that sexualize, objectify, insult, degrade and even physically threaten me. I have already — recently, in fact — looked into what is legally actionable in light of such abuse, and have supplied Twitter with scores of reports about the horrifying content on its platform. But this particular tsunami of gender-based violence and misogyny flooding my Twitter feed was overwhelming.

Tweets rolled in, calling me a cunt, a whore or a bitch, or telling me to suck a two-inch dick. Some even threatened rape, or “anal anal anal.”

Let’s be clear here: Shit talk is not the issue here. Shit talk is an important tradition in the world of sports and I, as a fan of a clever insult, would be sadder if the world had less shit talk in it. But shit talk is also an art. One should strive to be clever and inspiring when burning motherfuckers. Insight into your target’s character and behavior is the goal here. The premise of the insults aimed at Judd fall into two basic categories: 1) That being a woman is inherently shameful or 2) That being someone who is penetrated during sex is inherently shameful. As neither of those propositions is true, any attempts at shit talk based on either means that the person speaking has failed at the art of shit talk and should, in recompense, delete his Twitter account and take a vow of silence until he learns what “humor” is.

Judd’s tweet that drew so much attention isn’t like the funniest thing ever, but it at least touches on the bare minimums for proper shit talk: 1) She calls out behavior (in this case, playing dirty). 2) Her claims of superiority to the target of the shit talk are based in actual metrics. Her critics are working with the premise that a man is inherently better than a woman. Judd, on the other hand, is working on the premise that being good at the free throw line is better than being bad at it. Her joke is automatically better than theirs because her joke, unlike theirs, is based on a thing that is actually true about the world. It is better to make free throw shots than not. She even noted the irony of how fouling the other team works against you if they keep hitting free throws. Genius level observation compared to people who think that you’re a gross and foul person because you have a vagina.

In light of this, Mark Fuhrman’s remarks on Fox News regarding this situation prove, above all other things, that Mark Fuhrman is a classic mansplainer, in this case, trying to explain humor while possessing none of it.

“She doesn’t have a case because it’s March Madness,” he opined. “It’s college basketball. It’s the playoffs. All bets are off, all laws don’t apply.”

“So, you can threaten a woman with physical and sexual violence?” Fox News host Andrea Tantaros asked.

“This is my personal opinion,” Fuhrman insisted. “During basketball, during March Madness, if you don’t want to play then shut up. This is March Madness. Everybody’s getting out their best picks, the top four. You know, this is the time you lose money on basketball. And everybody’s crazy.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Indeed, it is true that one should not engage in shit talk if one is not willing to deal with shit talk. But, as noted above, tweeting “cunt” or “anal anal anal” at someone is not shit talk, because shit talk is supposed to be funny. The only people being babies who can’t play the game here are the men who are dog piling her. These men are so void of even the barest of wit, so much so that a fairly mediocre burn about free throws reduced them to gibbering idiots whose only retorts are variations on, “Oh yeah! Well, you’re a woman! So there!” Unable to compete with their wits, they instead just harass and abuse, hoping to silence those who are better at the game. The only people unable to take the heat are the misogynist harassers, who really do need to shut up until they can learn to distinguish between the art of shit talk and just baseless harassment.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Pandagon

Ch-ch-changes…..

Published

on

After many years and many server changes and finally landing here at Raw Story, which has taken very good care of us, it's time to say goodbye to Pandagon. I've been blogging under this banner for ten years, after Jesse Taylor asked me to join. He, in turn, had been running this joint since he was in college. A lot has changed since then. I became a journalist, moved from Austin to New York and learned to play Dungeons & Dragons. Jesse became a lawyer and, just this past weekend, a married man.

Continue Reading

Pandagon

Carly Fiorina defends her lie with a whole bunch of lies

Published

on

I do like it when Republican candidates sport a resume full of corporate executive work, because it really shows the public how many fools and idiots coast into that position not on merit but on their bullshitting abilities. Donald Trump, Herman Cain, and now we have Carly Fiorina, who just can't understand why her perceived underlings (voters, journalists) won't scurry away, pretending to accept her bullshit like former employees of hers had to do, lest they lost their jobs.

And so it goes that Fiorina, who could make this entire Planned Parenthood controversy go away by saying something like, "I may have misremembered the video, but I still think abortion is wrong," instead is doubling and tripling down. And every time she does, she lies more and more. She was on Meet the Press and, so enamored of the idea that she is perfect and could never do anything wrong, just went to town with the defensive posturing.

Continue Reading
 

Pandagon

Marco Rubio has an astoundingly low opinion of women’s intelligence

Published

on

At RH Reality Check, I covered this story that I wish was getting more press, about how Marco Rubio goes back and forth between suggesting that women who get abortions are greedy monsters who get pregnant for cash:

I just think you’ve created an industry now … a situation where very much, you’ve created an incentive for people not just to look forward to having more abortions, but being able to sell that fetal tissue for purposes—these centers—for purposes of making a profit off it, as you’ve seen in some of these Planned Parenthood affiliates.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image