Quantcast
Connect with us

US Secret Service has alcohol problem, director tells Congress

Published

on

The US Secret Service director admitted to Congress on Tuesday that his agents often drink, even as he sought funding to build a life-size mock-up of the White House to improve training.

Joseph Clancy, the tarnished agency’s new boss, was grilled by lawmakers outraged over its latest embarrassing security lapse, in which two senior agents drove into White House barricades after a night of boozing, but were not detained or given breathalyzer tests.

ADVERTISEMENT

House Appropriations Committee members expressed disbelief over Clancy’s acknowledgement that he did not learn of the March 4 incident, in which the agents hit barricades and drove through an active investigation, until five days later.

Stressing this was his “first test” since President Barack Obama elevated him to director last month, Clancy admitted he had yet to speak with the White House agent in charge at the time, citing the need for an independent inspector general’s investigation to proceed without interference.

“I should have been informed” immediately, he said. “We’re following up on that, and there will be accountability.”

The incident marked the latest of several mis-steps by the agency which protects the president and other dignitaries, including a major security breach last September when an intruder barged into the White House wielding a knife.

Lawmakers also appeared flabbergasted at Clancy’s suggestion that changing Secret Service “culture” would take time, as he seeks to earn agents’ trust as their new chief.’

ADVERTISEMENT

“Dude, you don’t have to earn their trust. You’re their boss!” House Republican Chris Stewart charged.

“They’re supposed to earn your trust and they haven’t earned your trust. And the way you earn their trust is you hold them accountable.”

A humbled Clancy repeatedly said “Yes, sir” and “Yes, ma’am” when confronted with withering bipartisan critiques, which only grew when he revealed agents were coping with job demands by drinking.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There’s an element within our agency that does cope with stresses… by using alcohol,” Clancy said, noting that the agency recently launched an initiative to address stress.

“We’ve got to find a way to help some of these people that are going toward alcohol as a coping mechanism,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

– ‘Breakdown’ –

The revelations infuriated some members of Congress, already frustrated by Secret Service shortcomings including hard-partying overseas incidents like the one in Cartagena, Colombia in 2012, when a dozen agents were caught soliciting prostitutes.

“Unfortunately this is the last in a long line of episodes somewhat similar — drinking, carousing, on and off duty — that this agency has suffered these last few years,” said committee chairman Hal Rogers regarding the latest White House incident, which includes accusations that supervisors may be protecting agents involved.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You can’t run an agency like this, for God’s sakes,” he added.

Democrat Nita Lowey said she found Clancy’s testimony “shocking,” and expressed concern he was unable to fire agents for drunkenness at the White House.

“I don’t want a member of the Secret Service, frankly, who’s capable of getting so inebriated that this kind of an action can be accepted,” she told Clancy.

Let them “find another job.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But Clancy said he needed to let due process play out.

“I don’t have the ability to just fire people at will,” he countered.

Several lawmakers told Clancy that sackings were in order.

“You got a big job and you’re going to have to make heads roll,” said House Republican John Carter, chairman of the panel’s homeland security subcommittee.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Secret Service’s fiscal year 2016 budget request is $1.9 billion, an annual increase of $273 million, largely for protective efforts ramping up during the presidential election cycle.

Clancy said his agency was seeking $8 million to construct a replica of the White House at a training facility in Maryland that will provide a “more realistic environment conducive to scenario-based training exercises.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump declares impeachment ‘dead’ — and demands apology — in late night Twitter outburst

Published

on

President Donald Trump lashed out on his favorite social media platform late Thursday evening.

Eight minutes before midnight eastern time, Trump unloaded.

Trump wrote, "Democrats must apologize to USA: Ukrainian Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko said that 'United States Ambassador Gordon Sondland did NOT link financial military assistance to a request for Ukraine to open up an investigation into former V.P. Joe Biden & his son, Hunter Biden. Ambassador Sondland did not tell us, and certainly did not tell me, about a connection between the assistance and the investigation.'”

Trump did not say why he was taking the word of a foreign official over multiple sworn testimonies from members of his own administration.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Pelosi is ‘marrying up the facts and the law’: Ex-prosecutor says ‘bribery’ is a critical indictment of Trump

Published

on

Speaker Nancy Pelosi was masterful in using the word "bribery" to describe President Donald Trump's actions with Ukraine that are at the heart of the impeachment inquiry, according to a former federal prosecutor.

MSNBC anchor Brian Williams interviewed former Assistant U.S. Attorney Berit Berger on Thursday evening's "The Last Word."

Please expand for us on why it is significant and why is it important to label this bribery," Williams said.

"So I think Nancy Pelosi was very specific in calling this bribery for two reasons," Berger replied.

"The first is that -- unlike quid pro quo -- ribery is something that most people understand, especially people who have children," she said, with a chuckle. "We all sort of have a general understanding of that."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Taylor Swift takes on former record label — and #IStandWithTaylor trends on Twitter

Published

on

Taylor Swift on Thursday publicly reignited her battle with the heads of her former label, saying it is threatening to bar her from going through with an upcoming performance and Netflix documentary over her plans to re-record her early albums.

Earlier this year the superstar began feuding with industry mogul Scooter Braun over his purchase of her former label for more than a decade, the Nashville-based Big Machine, which gave him a majority stake in the master recordings of her first six albums.

Swift said she would begin re-recording her early albums to create copies she owns herself, saying her contract allows her to begin re-doing albums one through five in November 2020, when she plans to be back in the studio doing just that.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image