Rahm Emanuel may have been elected to a second term as Chicago’s mayor on Tuesday but now he faces a stark choice: inflict pain on the city’s population in the form of unpopular measures such as higher taxes or kick its problems further down the road and risk a fiscal crisis that could even lead to bankruptcy later.
While voters appear to have seen President Barack Obama’s former chief of staff as more able than labor union-backed challenger Jesus “Chuy” Garcia to deal with Chicago’s massive public pension liabilities, neither candidate squarely addressed what could be a fiscal nightmare for the city.
The failure over many years to address the hole the city has dug for itself will finally catch up with Chicago if radical action isn’t taken soon to resolve the budget and pension problems, warn bankers, investors and fiscal policy experts.
“The day there’s no more dollars in the kitty, the day that the city is not going to be able to pay the next set of payrolls, that’s the day everyone will all of a sudden understand: ‘Wow, we really have to address this because there is no longer an option,’” said David Tawil, president of hedge fund Maglan Capital which invests in distressed situations but does not own Chicago debt.
The third-biggest U.S. city’s pension liabilities are its main problem. According to the Civic Federation, an independent fiscal watchdog group, the unfunded pension liabilities for Chicago, its Board of Education and other local governments that draw taxes from Chicago total a stunning $35.05 billion.
Next year, it faces a looming $550 million increase in its pension payment for firefighters and cops.
One credit rating agency, Moody’s, has Chicago’s credit rating near junk status, and the city’s yawning deficit is concerning investors who want evidence of reform.
“From my perspective I’m hoping that once the election gets out of the way there might be more of an ability to push through some things that might be needed to get (changes) done,” said Daniel Solender, municipal bond portfolio manager at fund management group Lord Abbett, which is underweight Chicago debt due to uncertainty over how the city will address its problems.
Emanuel’s most obvious immediate fix — raising property taxes — is a long-shot amid fears it could trigger a population exodus to lower-tax states. Emanuel himself has said any tax increase would be a “last resort.”
“The higher taxes are, the more people leave the state so there are less people to pay the taxes,” said Ty Fahner, a former Illinois Attorney General and a partner at law firm Mayer Brown in Chicago in a recent interview.
As alternatives, Emanuel has offered options including setting up a city-run casino and imposing a new tax on services performed by lawyers and other professionals, both of which would require state approval. But Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner has vowed not to raise taxes without major government restructuring, and though a Chicago casino could crank out $140 million a year in revenues for the city, it would be years before it would open and reach that level.
William Brandt, former chairman of the Illinois Finance Authority and head of the economic restructuring firm Development Associates, said Emanuel’s task will be remarkably complex, with little room for error.
“On a scale of 1 to 10, it’s going to be an 11,” Brandt said. “The fact is there needs to be some day of reckoning in Chicago.”
Chicago’s dire circumstances have led to comparisons with Detroit, which filed for bankruptcy in 2013 after years of steep declines in population and economic activity.
Chicago has not seen the population losses Detroit did and its business and commercial real estate markets remain healthy, but its current circumstances are more dire than any other major American city today, with aggregate debt of $21.4 billion, up 60 percent since 2004.
Although Chicago’s situation isn’t bad enough yet to warrant a bankruptcy filing, that threat is out there if it fails to tackle its problems.
“People say Chicago’s not Detroit,” said Tom Metzold, a senior portfolio advisor at investment manager Eaton Vance. “Not right now. Chicago is Detroit ten years from now. I don’t care how economically strong your economy is. They don’t have a printing press. You can only tax so much.”
Metzold estimated the odds of a Chapter 9 bankruptcy in the next five years are “virtually zero” but said in the next 10 years that could rise to 25 percent if it fails to act.
The Illinois governor has already warned of a fiscal collapse. “Chicago is sliding into bankruptcy,” Rauner told reporters in early March. “They can’t pay their pensions, they can’t pay their bills. The debt has been going up for years.”
Illinois state law does not allow municipalities to file for bankruptcy although a recently-proposed state bill would give cities the right to file. Just a threat of bankruptcy could give impetus to negotiations with unions and creditors.
“I think it needs to be lurking out there in the background as a reason for negotiations,” said John Miller, co-head of fixed income for Nuveen Assset Management.
A pressing immediate concern is the likelihood that the state loses its battle to pull itself out of its own fiscal hole by reforming pensions. Legal observers expect the state’s Supreme Court to invalidate Illinois’ 2013 pension reform law within weeks.
Credit rating agencies have said they could lower Chicago’s rating if this happens because the city faces a similar legal challenge to its pension reform efforts by labor unions.
Chicago’s Chief Financial Officer, Lois Scott, in court testimony in December laid out a grim scenario for such a development: hundreds of millions of dollars in additional interest costs; termination of billions of dollars of credits, and ever-increasing difficulty in finding investors for debt issues.
Emanuel is hoping for a reprieve on the looming $550 million pension payment hike but John Cullerton, president of the state Senate, did not hold out much hope.
“Politically, I don’t think you want to kick the can down the road,” Cullerton said.
For now, Emanuel seems unlikely to explore another option potentially available to him: the privatization of city assets.
Financial experts say privatization of a major asset, such as Chicago’s Midway Airport, would generate cash and help Chicago work through its fiscal problems. But this is problematic in Chicago. Emanuel’s predecessor, Richard M. Daley, spent almost all of the $1.2 billion of proceeds from the lease of the city’s parking meters, and residents’ resentment grew when parking rates more than quadrupled in the first few years of the lease.
Emanuel tried to privatize Midway in 2013, but backed out after one of two bid groups dropped out.
“I don’t think the Mayor wants to be the guy who sold the air field,” said one restructuring industry source. “Even in bankruptcy, Detroit didn’t want to get rid of (its) art and museum.”
(Reporting by Megan Davies in New York and Karen Pierog in Chicago; Editing by David Greising and Martin Howell)
‘I don’t care’: Watch Kamala Harris shut down Chris Hayes for asking a dumb question about Trump
Sen. Kamala Harris shut down MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes during a post-debate interview on Tuesday evening.
Hayes questioned Harris about her call for Twitter to follow their terms of service and kick President Donald Trump off of the platform.
"Do you think he puts people’s lives in danger when he targets them in tweets?" Hayes asked.
"Absolutely," Harris replied.
"Do you think he knows that?" Hayes asked.
"Does it matter?" Harris replied.
"The fact is he did it. The fact is that he is irresponsible, he is erratic," she explained. "He is like a 2-year-old with a machine gun."
Democrats blast Trump and demand his impeachment at CNN debate
Democratic White House hopefuls united in searing condemnation of Donald Trump during their fourth debate Tuesday, saying the president has broken the law, abused his power, and deserves to be impeached.
From the opening moments, most of the dozen candidates on stage launched fierce broadsides against Trump over the Ukrainian scandal at the heart of the impeachment inquiry.
"The impeachment must go forward," said Senator Elizabeth Warren, who is neck and neck with former vice president Joe Biden at the head of the 2020 nominations race.
"Impeachment is the way that we establish that this man will not be permitted to break the law over and over without consequences," she thundered.
Here are 3 winners and 4 losers from the CNN/NYT Democratic presidential primary debate
Twelve Democrats took to the stage Tuesday night for yet another debate in the party's 2020 president primary hosted by CNN and the New York Times.
After only ten candidates qualified for the previous debate, an additional two — Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and wealthy donor and former hedge fund manager Tom Steyer — made it to the stage this round for an even more crowded event.
The candidates discussed a range of important policy issues, but since the format was a debate, and they're all competing for the same nomination, it is ultimately most critical who won and who lost the night. Here are three winners and four losers — necessarily a subjective assessment, of course — from the debate: