Quantcast
Connect with us

Walmart uses Georgia ‘conscience clause’ to refuse woman’s miscarriage treatment

Published

on

'Walmart store photographed on Sept. 15, 2011 In Los Angeles' [Shutterstock]

A Georgia woman is accusing Walmart of taking advantage of state law to refuse to fill out prescriptions helping her and others deal with miscarriages.

WGXA-TV reported that Brittany Cartrett was turned away while seeking a prescription for Misoprostol at her local store.

Her doctor recommended she take the drug after she miscarried about five weeks into her pregnancy, enabling her to avoid undergoing a more invasive procedure. But Misoprostol can also be used with Mifepristone to end a pregnancy in its early stages. She suspects that it was for that reason that the store refused her prescription without providing a reason.

ADVERTISEMENT

While she was able to obtain the medication somewhere else, she brought the issue up again when visiting the store to fill out a separate prescription.

“She looks at my name and she says ‘Oh, well, I couldn’t think of a valid reason why you would need this prescription,'” Cartrett said. “I tell her my reasons for needing it, and she says ‘Well, I don’t feel like there is a reason why you would need it, so we refused to fill it.'”

A pharmacist for the store, Sandip Patel, told WGXA that under state law, pharmacists are able to turn down prescriptions. A Walmart spokesperson said the company encourages its pharmacists to “use their professional judgement” on a case-by-case basis.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), the Georgia law, which states that pharmacists “shall not be required to fill a prescription for an emergency contraceptive drug,” is part of some states’ response to the Supreme Court Roe v. Wade verdict legalizing abortions.

“The issue is expanding as pharmacists are refusing to fill emergency contraception and contraception prescriptions,” the NCLS stated. “This movement resulted in the term ‘conscience clause,’ which gives pharmacists the right to refuse to perform certain services based on a violation of personal beliefs or values. Most of the debate revolves around a pharmacist dispensing emergency contraception.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cartrett shared her story online, saying she felt like the pharmacist was judging her — and thus, refusing to help her — because of a negative view of abortions. She also told WGXA that she has been contacted by women in similar circumstances who have also been turned away.

“I’m not going to see that pharmacist, I’m going to see a doctor,” she said. “If its because of that due to the conscience clause, I think its called, then what other decisions are they making based on our health and our needs by not giving a prescription to someone who may or may not need it?”

Watch WGXA’s report, as posted online, below.

ADVERTISEMENT

[h/t Addicting Info]

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Cops violated Breonna Taylor’s civil rights before they even knocked down her door: Legal expert

Published

on

A legal expert explained that Breonna Taylor's civil rights were violated before Louisville police showed up at her apartment to serve a search warrant.

Civil rights attorney Maya Wiley told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" the system that let police off the hook in Taylor's killing was inherently rigged against people of color, because it shields officers from accountability when they make mistakes.

"Remember [this] started as a no-knock warrant, and because she had no criminal record, because there were real questions here, they actually changed it to a knock-and-announce [warrant], that tells you something," Wiley said. "It also tells us we need to know more because, as I said, there were indications the Postal Service inspector said they didn't think there were suspicious packages, so there is a need to understand more."

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump made an ‘implicit threat of violence’ when he refused to say he’d leave peacefully: CNN’s Berman

Published

on

CNN's John Berman on Thursday accused President Donald Trump of implicitly threatening the use of violence if he loses the 2020 presidential election.

While discussing Trump's refusal to commit to a peaceful transition of power should he lose the 2020 election, Berman said that this was the kind of thing he'd expect to hear from leaders in foreign countries without long traditions of upholding democracy.

"To be clear, the refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer in and of itself is an implicit threat of violence," he said.

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Here’s how Trump intends to create ‘chaos and deadlock’ to steal the election from voters

Published

on

The author of a new piece outlining how President Donald Trump could steal the election from voters explained just how that might happen.

The Atlantic's Barton Gellman revealed the Trump campaign is exploring a strategy to pressure Republican-led state legislatures to appoint electors, instead of letting voters choose, and he told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" how that would work in practice.

"The only other time in history we had a debacle like this with possibility of the multiple competing slates of electors where two groups of people said, 'I'm the state elector for the state of Pennsylvania,' for example, it's supposed to go to Congress," Gellman said. "Congress is supposed to decide who are the legitimate electors, if any, from the state, and the problem is the electorate count act is one of the most garbled statutes ever passed by Congress, which is saying a lot."

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE