Quantcast
Connect with us

California senate approves bill to make vaccinations mandatory

Published

on

Child receives vaccination (Shutterstock)

Measure which would exclude most opt-outs for children – including on religious grounds – will now be debated in state assembly later this summer

A controversial bill that would make common vaccinations mandatory for California school children and curtail most ways to opt kids out of the shots sailed past a full vote of the state senate on Thursday.

“One child who is not immunized is not a big deal,” said Senator Ben Allen, a co-author of the bill, before the vote. “This is about how each of our personal choices impacts others.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The bill passed 25 to 10. It needed 21 votes to advance to the state assembly, where it will now be debated later in the summer.

Before the vote, three senators who oppose the measure suggested amendments that were quickly quashed by their colleagues.

The most hotly contested question was whether the measure should contain an exemption for religious beliefs, as similar laws in 48 other states do. If passed, California would join Mississippi and West Virginia as the only states that do not allow religious exemptions.

Senator Joel Anderson, a Catholic who has been the most vocal legislator on the issue of religious exemption, proposed an amendment that would allow an opt-out if it was legally notarized and stated that the vaccinations were against a person’s faith on penalty of perjury.

He focused on his objection that certain vaccines are cultured using a medium that originally contained aborted fetal cells. These FDA-approved cell lines were obtained more than 50 years ago and have been propagated since, but now vaccines cultured in them contain only the most minute traces of the founding DNA. The final vaccines contain no human tissue.

ADVERTISEMENT

Anderson said he objects to forcing parents opposed to abortion to use those vaccines. Doing so without first informing parents of their contents means, “you have a right to steal my soul without my knowledge,” he said. “We are taking in the dark of night without parents’ or guardians’ knowledge.”

Senator Ben Allen countered that he had asked numerous religious leaders, including those in the Catholic church, about their position on vaccines and had not found any “mainstream” religions that opposed vaccinations. He further pointed out that the Vatican has previously publicly supported vaccinations.

Later, Allen added, “The freedom of religion is not limitless.” But said that considering a religious amendment was still a possibility as the bill winds it’s way through the maze of assembly committees.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If it’s truly a good-faith attempt to strengthen the bill, of course I’m going to look at it,” he said.

And it remains possible that California’s Governor Jerry Brown could ultimately decide the religious issue. Brown has indicated that he supports the current bill, according to Allen. But in a 2012 vaccine bill, AB 2109, Brown added a religious exemption in as a condition of his signing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Other senators in opposition to SB 277 voiced concern that the bill would drive school kids out of public schools, impacting their state right to a public education, or that the proposal unfairly impacted parents’ rights.

Senator Ted Gaines spoke about an adverse reaction his then-infant daughter had to a vaccine, including seizures, and a subsequent medical diagnoses that advised holding off on further vaccinations for 10 years. While his family ultimately chose to move forward with shots after that waiting period, he voiced concern for taking those medical decisions away from families.

“To me this comes down to a parental rights issue,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Citizens opposing the bill, who have flooded capitol hallways and hearing rooms each time it is debated, were again out at full force. Wearing red to symbolize children they say have been harmed by vaccinations, members of the California Coalition for Health Choice filled much of the senate gallery and voiced disappointment after the vote.

“Of course our next step is lots and lots of face time with assembly members,” said Joni Martin, a member of the California Coalition for Health Choice, which opposes the bill. “I am hoping the assembly members will show better sense than the senate members who have expressed their support have so far.”

If Senate Bill 277 makes it through the assembly and is signed by the governor, it will require children in both public and private school to be vaccinated against 10 childhood illnesses including measles and whooping cough as a condition of on-campus attendance. Any new vaccinations added to the list in coming years would be eligible for personal belief waivers, and kids already past the kindergarten checkpoint would not be forced to obtain missing vaccinations until the next seventh-grade checkpoint.

The bill has been amended numerous times as it cleared committees on its way to a full senate vote. Most recently, it was quietly changed last week to remove a provision that would have required schools to periodically report their vaccination rates to parents.

ADVERTISEMENT

Because that provision would have incurred a cost to the state, it would have pushed the bill into the appropriations committee. Bill authors Dr Richard Pan and Allen removed that reporting requirement, allowing the bill to bypass that final committee and move straight to the senate floor.

Critics say that move was unfair.

“This is yet again an example of the many ways that this bill is not making sense,” said Mitchell. “What doesn’t make sense is that there are costs that are going to be involved in implementing this bill for sure.” She pointed to the need to educate parents on the new law and track vaccination changes in the future.

The bill will now repeat the committee process in the assembly. If it is amended in that house, it must return to the senate. But if it passes, it goes to the governor’s desk to be signed into law.

“This effort is not over,” said Allen. “But I do feel confident that ultimately science and good reason will wind its way into the minds of my colleagues in the assembly.”

ADVERTISEMENT

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2015


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Arizona Republican likens Trump’s loss to Japan getting nuked while losing WW II — but as a good thing

Published

on

President Donald Trump on Monday allowed President-elect Joe Biden's transition to proceed -- while vowing he would never concede.

Despite Trump losing the election, some Trump supporters are refusing to accept the outcome.

One Arizona Republican in Congress, Paul Gosar, drew upon the historical knowledge him learned on his way to becoming a dentist in a bizarre analogy he posted on Twitter.

Gosar suggested the Trump movement would be like an Imperial Japanese soldier in World War II who refused to surrender until 1974.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Neal Katyal predicts law schools will teach a ‘Worst Mistakes in Court’ class on Trump’s ‘pathetic’ 20-day fiasco

Published

on

Prominent lawyer Neal Katyal is best known for having tried over 40 cases before the United States Supreme Court and serving as acting Solicitor General during the Obama administration.

But he also has spent more than two decades as a law professor at Georgetown.

He drew upon all of that experience for a Monday evening appearance on MSNBC's "The Last Word" with Lawrence O'Donnell.

"Someday a law school class is going to be called 'The Worst Mistakes in Court' -- and it will be just about these 20 days," Katyal predicted. "Because this legal strategy is so pathetic it makes Trump's coronavirus strategy look competent by contrast."

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Trump vows he ‘will never concede’ — in 11 pm conspiracy-filled rant

Published

on

Donald Trump lost the 2020 presidential to President-elect Joe Biden, but is still refusing to concede.

White House aides reportedly convinced him to allow Biden to begin his transition by telling him he did not need to use the word "concede."

But that word appeared to be on his mind late Monday night.

"What does GSA being allowed to preliminarily work with the Dems have to do with continuing to pursue our various cases on what will go down as the most corrupt election in American political history?" Trump asked while continuing to lie about the election being corrupt.

Continue Reading