The sponsor on a bill that would ban abortion after 20 weeks in Wisconsin said this week that medical professionals did not help write the legislation.
On Tuesday, lawmakers on the Wisconsin state Joint Health Committee debated a bill that seeks stop all abortions after 20 weeks without any exceptions for rape or incest. State Sen. Mary Lazich (R), however, insisted to colleagues that the measure she was sponsoring was a bill to prevent “children” from feeling pain, an idea that is based on refuted studies claiming fetuses can experience pain after 20 weeks.
Democratic state Rep. JoCasta Zamarripa pointed out that the 20-week ban made no exceptions for rape or incest.
Lazich suggested that no exceptions were necessary because “rape and incest people tend to deal with that in the very early stages, days, weeks.”
“What this bill does is prohibit abortions on children who can feel pain,” she said. “So we don’t differentiate classes of children and say it’s okay to put the pain on some classes of children, and not on other classes of children.”
Zamarripa also pointed out that the bill would require doctors to save a mother’s life in the way that was most likely to ensure a child’s survival, which might not be in the best interest of the mother.
“It’s a provision that maximizes the survivability of the unborn child with no regard for the impact that it would have on the woman’s life,” Zamarripa said.
Rep. Jesse Kremer (R), who co-authored the bill, said that the language was necessary to make sure that physicians were not “intentionally killing a child just to kill a child.”
“Why do you think medical groups like the Wisconsin Medical Society oppose the bill?” Zamarripa wondered.
Lazich argued that she had spoken to “many” anti-abortion medical doctors who supported the bill.
“If you think you have a solid bill here, why do all the medical groups in Wisconsin oppose this bill?” Zamarripa pressed.
Lazich replied that she would rather put her life in the hands of doctors who opposed abortion, and instead “take the life-affirming approach.”
“Can I ask who wrote the bill and did they have medical training?” Zamarripa asked.
“Who wrote the bill? Our drafting attorney wrote the bill,” Lazich smiled.
“Do either of you have any medical training,” Zamarripa followed up.
“What does that have to do with the bill?” Lazich shot back as the audience gasped. “Do you have medical training?”
Zamarripa reminded the Republican lawmaker that her bill was before the Joint Health Committee.
“It could put the lives of many, many women in danger,” she observed. “I think that’s an appropriate question.”
Watch the video below from Wisconsin Eye, broadcast June 2, 2015.
Maddow reveals how one state stood up to Trump’s USPS cuts — and won
MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow's opening segment on Friday focused on a positive story of political pressure stopping one of the Trump administration's attacks on the U.S. Postal Service.
Maddow reported how NBC Montana reporter Maritsa Georgiou had doggedly reported on the removal of postal boxes in Missoula, where she is based. Missoula has been a long-time Democratic Party stronghold.
Montana has a competitive U.S. Senate election in 2020, with Democratic Gov. Steve Bullock challenging first-term Republican Sen. Steve Daines.
As Georgiou chased the story, she learned there were also plans to remove boxes in the battleground of Billings. And more planned for the blue town of Bozeman. And other towns.
Pepsi joins the chorus of people dunking on Tucker Carlson over Kamala Harris
The Pepsi soda company mocked Fox News personality Tucker Carlson on Friday evening.
On Tuesday, Carlson flipped out after a guest attempted to teach him how to pronounce the name of Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), who is running for vice president on Joe Biden's ticket.
Video of the exchange was posted on Twitter by Nikki McCann Ramirez, a researcher at the watchdog group Media Matters for America.
Tucker Carlson loses it when a guest corrects his pronunciation of Kamala Harris's name pic.twitter.com/1fHIrPGuwN
Trump supporter shut down on Fox News: ‘Turns out Stephen Moore is not a very good epidemiologist’
University of Michigan economics professor Justin Wolfers mocked Trump 2016 economics advisor Stephen Moore on Fox News over the administrations bungled response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
"Let's not have economists play epidemiologists here, mate," Wolfers said in his Australian accent.
"We actually tried Steve's prescription, which was not shutting down, that's what the sunbelt states did," he explained.
"What have you got? You've got spreading disease everywhere and you've got the economies there forced to shut down," he explained.
"We tried what Stephen Moore wanted -- it turns out Stephen Moore is not a very good epidemiologist," Wolfers concluded.