Pro-Confederate activists at a rally in Florida over the weekend insisted that a mural of Ku Klux Klansmen in hooded robes should not be removed from the Baker County Courthouse because it was “not a racist thing.”
Following the removal of the Confederate flag from the South Carolina statehouse grounds, Jacksonville civil attorney John Phillips argued that the mural in the Baker County Courthouse was stirring up racial division.
The mural, which greets visitors as they enter the courthouse, features a small vignette with three hooded Klansmen riding horses. Although Eugene Barber, who painted the mural in 2001, has died, he left visitors a guidebook that offers a short explanation for the vignette:
When the group known as the “Radical Republicans” gained control of the state in 1868, the Reconstruction program took an unpleasant turn. … The reversed order was severely resented by a large segment of the white population. Lawlessness among ex-slaves and troublesome whites was the rule of the day. No relief was given by the carpetbag and scalawag government or by the Union troops. The result was the emergence of secret societies claiming to bring law and order to the county. One of these groups was the Ku Klux Klan, an organization that sometimes took vigilante justice to extremes but was sometimes the only control the county knew over those outside the law. The Klan faded from view at the end of Reconstruction. It had minor come-backs in the 1920’s and mid 1950’s. Since then it has become the subject of legend rather than a cause of fear.
Phillips said that other images also had dark meanings, including a bird that had been connected to white supremacists and the official flower of the Klan. The Southern Poverty Law Center’s Mark Potok, however, told The Florida Times-Union that all of the images did not support “the idea at all that the mural somehow glorifies white supremacy.”
As of Friday, almost 2,000 people had signed two petitions calling for the county to move the mural.
Supporters of the mural showed up with Confederate flags to a rally on Saturday, but organizers said that turnout was not as high as they had hoped.
Protesters insisted to WJXT that images depicted in the mural were part of their heritage.
“They got everything all wrong on that,” one man explained. “It’s not a racist thing.”
“I love it, I do,” he added. “It’s awesome.”
“I thought it was a bunch of malarkey,” another man said of the effort to remove the mural. “This means history, this is not nothing to do with slavery. It’s our heritage, and that’s the way it should be.”
“We all stick together. One for all and all for one.”
Watch the video below from WJXT, broadcast July 18, 2015.
CNN panel lights up Trump over ‘the greatest hypocrisy’ of his presidency
President Donald Trump received harsh criticism on Saturday for golfing while continuing to push conspiracy theories about the 2020 presidential election, which Trump lost to President-elect Joe Biden.
"In Wisconsin, President-elect Joe Biden has just picked up more votes in the state's recount. Remember, this is a recount that was requested by President Trump's campaign in its failing attempt to overturn the election results," CNN's Boris Sanchez reported. "The final count gave Biden a more than 180,000 vote edge over his rival in Milwaukee County and certified his victory."
"By the way, the recount cost millions of dollars, so the Trump team spent millions to lose even harder," he added.
CNN legal analyst laughs off Trump’s desire to get before the Supreme Court after a series of ‘humiliating’ court losses
On CNN Saturday, former federal prosecutor Elie Honig assessed the mounting failures in President Donald Trump's legal efforts to challenge the result of the 2020 election.
"I'm laughing because they keep trying, and the results this week somehow went from horrible to somehow even worse," said Honig. "The big case now is ... Rudy Giuliani's effort to overturn Pennsylvania. Last week, a federal district court judge firmly rejected the case. He said there's zero evidence. He called the case, a quote, 'Frankenstein's monster haphazardly stitched together' and that's gotta sting, and yesterday a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals decisively and harshly rejected the case as well. And the thing is, President Trump's lawyers tried to attack the first judge, saying, well, he's an Obama nominee. Well, guess what? The three judges yesterday who unanimously rejected it were appointed by President George W. Bush, George W. Bush, and Donald J. Trump."
Judges are ‘fed up’ with Trump’s voter fraud claims as his lawyers get ‘themselves into hot water’: Ex-prosecutor
On CNN Saturday, following Donald Trump's Pennsylvania election suit being dismissed in a scathing opinion by a federal judge he had appointed, former federal prosecutor Shan Wu broke down the significance of the latest developments.
"I think this judge was just the latest in a series of judges fed up with the Trump team's weak arguments," said Wu. "I said in a piece back on November 8th on CNN that it was time for the Trump legal team to put up or shut up, and they haven't done either. I mean, judge after judge has rebuked them for not having any actual evidence. Even their claims are inconsistent. You hear the president publicly, Rudy Giuliani, the so-called mastermind, talking about fraud, and yet also Giuliani publicly has said this is not a fraud case. So they're all over the board."