Los Angeles officials on Tuesday moved to declare the rising problem of homelessness an “emergency” in the city and proposed spending $100 million to provide permanent housing and shelters to help the city’s 26,000 indigent.
Mayor Eric Garcetti joined several City Council members in unveiling the plan, which follows an increase in the city’s homeless population from just under 23,000 two years ago, according to the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority.
With a number of luxury residential buildings opening in recent years, especially downtown, some community groups blame gentrification for contributing to the city’s skyrocketing rents and worsening homeless problem.
The nation’s second-largest city has nearly 18,000 individuals living on the streets, as opposed to shelters. Groups of homeless people dwelling in tents on sidewalks have become an increasingly frequent sight in the city.
Officials in New York, the nation’s biggest city, which has a more extensive shelter system, say that last year they had about 3,360 people living unsheltered.
The plan by Los Angeles officials to spend $100 million to provide more permanent housing, shelter beds and other homeless services was introduced to the City Council on Tuesday, a day after Garcetti proposed another $13 million in immediate expenditures to tackle homelessness.
“The city has pushed this problem from neighborhood to neighborhood for too long,” Garcetti, a Democrat who is campaigning to attract the 2024 Olympic Games to Los Angeles, told a news conference.
“It has cost us money, and most importantly it’s cost us lives,” he said of the homelessness problem.
City Council President Herb Wesson said the proposal, which will come up for a vote by the full council within weeks along with a declaration that homelessness in Los Angeles represents an emergency, would make the money available starting in January 2016.
The emergency declaration could allow Los Angeles to receive federal funding to combat the problem, according to Wesson’s office.
Garcetti last year pledged to end the problem of homelessness among veterans by the end of 2015. Hundreds of other U.S. mayors have made similar pledges under an initiative of President Barack Obama’s administration.
Garcetti’s office said the $100 million officials have proposed to spend starting next year should be a recurring, annual expenditure.
The city currently spends over $13 million from its general fund for homeless programs, such as winter shelters, housing vouchers and outreach to homeless veterans, said Assistant City Administrative Officer Ben Ceja.
(Reporting by Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Dan Whitcomb and Eric Beech)
A historian of Nazi Germany explains why the divided opposition to Trump should terrify you
As we witnessed in the third Democratic primary debate last week, Democratic presidential candidates are struggling to distinguish themselves from their party rivals and competing for endorsements. Their horizontal vision in these disagreements diverts their gaze from the peril we face as Donald Trump dismantles the norms that have guided our political life since 1776.
Whatever their differences, Democratic candidates must agree to broad principles related to key issues, for example, immigration, health care, and the growing wealth gap. A general consensus would leave plenty of room for healthy debates about implementation, but failure to emphasize shared ideals in relationship to two or three major questions will blunt Democrats’ offensive against a candidate whose campaign is based on slander and fear.
Trump’s longshot bid to win New Mexico has political leaders baffled: ‘He’s a batsh*t racist’
Despite losing New Mexico by eight points in the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump and his campaign manager Brad Pascale are making big plans to win the state in 2020 -- and that has political observers baffled.
With Trump appearing in New Mexico on Monday night, Politico reports the president has his work cut out for him in a state that saw the GOP lose the governorship and one House seat in 2018.
"The Land of Enchantment has voted for a Republican presidential candidate only once since 1992. With a considerable nonwhite voter population and all-Democratic congressional delegation, it’s not exactly fertile ground for a surprise GOP victory," the report notes before adding that Parscale feels they can make inroads this go-around.
Why won’t the Democrats talk openly about impeachment?
The ABC/Univision Democratic debate last week ran a bit more smoothly than the previous two, even managing to squeeze in a decent discussion on climate change and Afghanistan policy. These events are always more theater than substance, particularly with so many people on the stage. But early debates in the primary season are where engaged partisan voters outside the early states get a chance to see the larger field of candidates and develop a sense of where the party's center of gravity is in the current election cycle.