Quantcast
Connect with us

Topless protesters slap Missouri city with lawsuit over ‘decency’ ordinance criminalizing breastfeeding women

Published

on

A lawsuit filed by the ACLU on behalf of two women challenges an indecent exposure ordinance in Springfield, Missouri that they say unfairly targets breastfeeding women.

The ordinance has been stirring controversy, and according to the ACLU’s lawsuit, the way it’s worded could render breastfeeding children over 1 year old illegal. Along with criminalizing the showing of female breasts, the ordinance also forbade “the showing of covered male genitals in a discernibly turgid state” — language that was later removed.

ADVERTISEMENT

The ACLU brought the suit on behalf of the local Free the Nipple chapter, a group that advocates for women’s equality.

“If I cause affront or alarm, I could get ticketed,” Jessica Lawson told the Springfield News-Leader. “I try to avoid all criminal activity. I definitely feel that the law needs to be fixed.”

The lawsuit says the ordinance violates women’s rights to free expression and relegates them to “inferior legal status.”

Even the city’s own mayor, Bob Stephens, believes the ordinance violates the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal treatment under the law.

“I think my reaction was, ‘Oh boy, we’re going to have to spend more time on a goofy ordinance, and a goofy issue that will go away when the weather turns cold,’ ” Stephens said to KSPR. “I guarantee you in February, nobody will be parading on the square without their shirt on. We’re spending way too much time on it. Now, because of a lawsuit, we’re going to be spending way too much of taxpayer money on it, probably to be told we were wrong in passing the ordinance to start with.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Lawson, who is one of two plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said the law unfairly targets women. Aside from the lawsuit, activists held a bare-chested protest — with nipples covered to stay in compliance with the law —  in response.

“We definitely feel like we accomplished our goal with the first protest,” Lawson said. “It was to draw attention to the gender-biased law.”

The ordinance currently renders illegal exposure of “the female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola, for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification or which is likely to cause affront or alarm,” according to the ACLU.

ADVERTISEMENT

Exceptions include, “performances of adult entertainment” and “exposure of the female breast necessarily incident to breast-feeding an infant.”

The ACLU notes that “infant” usually means children 12 months and younger.

ADVERTISEMENT

As of yet, the city hasn’t cited anyone. So Springfield City Attorney Dan Wichmer told the Associated Press he doesn’t believe the lawsuit has any standing. But city officials don’t seem surprised by it.

“Challenges to indecent exposure laws under the disguise of First and 14th amendment protections have repeatedly been rejected by the courts,” City Councilman Justin Burnett, who initially proposed the ordinance, told the AP. “Repealing this law would subject families to public nudity, jeopardize our local economy and is blatantly irresponsible.”

But Stephens said it was a mistake to pass a law dictating the amount of skin women can show in public while ignoring men, saying, “I think that’s probably a violation of the 14th Amendment, which is equal treatment under the law.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Watch Anderson Cooper use the long-form of ‘BS’ while shutting down Rod Blagojevich on CNN

Published

on

MSNBC anchor Anderson Cooper was visibly angered by claims made by former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich during a Friday evening CNN interview.

Blogojevich was sentenced to 14 years in federal prison for corruption while in office that included attempting to sell the U.S. Senate seat vacancy created when Barack Obama was elected president. His sentence was commuted by President Donald Trump.

Cooper lectured Blogojevich for getting sued while governor over a backlog of 3,000 clemency cases.

The CNN anchor described it as "a little ironic and frankly a little sad and pathetic and hypocritical."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Judge rules against Devin Nunes in $9.9 million lawsuit over the salacious Steele Dossier

Published

on

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) suffered a legal setback after losing a major lawsuit he had filed.

"A federal judge has tossed out a racketeering lawsuit House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes filed last year against the private investigation firm at the heart of the Trump-Russia saga," Politico reported Friday evening.

"Alexandria, Virginia-based U.S. District Court Judge Liam O'Grady's two-page order made short work of Nunes' suit, which sought $9.9 million in damages from Fusion GPS, its founder Glenn Simpson and a nonprofit watchdog group, Campaign for Accountability," Politico explained. "The judge also signaled that pressing on with the legal battle could result in sanctions against Nunes and his attorney, Steven Biss."

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Devin Nunes is livid at report he helped Trump’s White House: ‘Who the hell is leaking this?’

Published

on

The ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee is suing Washington, DC's hometown newspaper.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) announced that he was suing The Washington Post during a Friday appearance on Fox News.

“A senior U.S. intelligence official told lawmakers last week that Russia wants to see President Trump reelected, viewing his administration as more favorable to the Kremlin’s interests, according to people who were briefed on the comments,” The Washington Post reported Thursday. “Trump learned about Pierson’s remarks from Rep. Devin Nunes (Calif.), the committee’s ranking Republican and a staunch Trump ally, said one person familiar with the matter.”

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image