Quantcast
Connect with us

Obama administration asks Supreme Court to revive immigration plan

Published

on

The Obama administration on Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to revive President Barack Obama’s executive action to protect millions of illegal immigrants from deportation, saying Republican-led states had no legal basis to challenge it.

Exactly a year to the day after Obama announced the plan, the Justice Department formally appealed a 2-1 decision on Nov. 9 by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that affirmed a lower court’s February decision to halt it.

ADVERTISEMENT

If the appeals court ruling is left in place, millions of people would “continue to work off the books, without the option of lawful employment to provide for their families,” Solicitor General Donald Verrilli said in the filing to the nine justices.

Obama’s executive order would let up to 4.7 million illegal immigrants live in the United States without the threat of deportation. It was directed at people with no criminal records whose children are U.S. citizens.

Verrilli wrote that the Supreme Court should hear the case because the appeals court “upheld an unprecedented nationwide injunction against implementing a federal immigration enforcement policy of great national importance.”

If left intact, the ruling would “allow states to frustrate the federal government’s enforcement of the nation’s immigration laws,” Verrilli added.

ADVERTISEMENT

The legal challenge was made by 26 Republican-governed states led by Texas that contend Obama overstepped his presidential powers by bypassing the Republican-led Congress and acting unilaterally.

The states have no legal standing to sue the U.S. government over decisions on how to enforce federal laws, the administration said in its appeal.

A spokesman for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the state will “continue defending the rule of law” against “the president’s unconstitutional use of executive power.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The administration had said on Nov. 10 that it planned an appeal. The justices will consider whether to hear the case once they receive responses from the states, due within 30 days.

If they hear the dispute, it would become one of the centerpiece cases of the court’s term that runs through June, along with a challenge to a restrictive Texas abortion law.

Two hours after the appeal was lodged, dozens of immigration advocates rallied in front of the Supreme Court building, chanting in English and Spanish and waving placards. One read, “Children have the right to be with their parents.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Separately, the appeals court on Thursday allowed three illegal immigrant women from Texas to participate in the case in support of the administration.

Obama’s executive order, which came after a bipartisan immigration policy overhaul bill passed by the Senate died in the House of Representatives, expanded a program first launched in 2012 that deferred deportation for immigrants brought to the United States as children.

The immigration issue has driven a wedge between Hispanics, a voting bloc with rising clout, and Republicans, many of whom take a hard line against illegal immigrants. Most of the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants are Hispanic.

ADVERTISEMENT

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Warren narrowly beats Sanders to take over second place for first time in new poll of 17,000 Democratic voters

Published

on

U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has narrowly taken second place in a new, just-released Politico/Morning Consult nation-wide poll of more than 17,000 registered voters. Warren beat Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) for the first time in this specific poll. Former Vice President Joe Biden maintains his first place position.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Republicans keep dragging trolls, wackos and conspiracy theorists before hearings — are the Democrats finally fed up?

Published

on

Republicans in Congress returned to Capitol Hill following their August recess last week and immediately set out to make a mockery of their constitutional obligation — inviting discredited witnesses to provide expert testimony in a manner that only served to derail, dismiss and diminish otherwise serious subject manners.

Former Turning Point USA communications director Candace Owens was again invited by Republicans to appear before a House Joint Oversight Subcommittee on combating white supremacy. Owens, who previously argued that the 2018 mail bombings targeting Democrats actually resulted from a conspiracy plot orchestrated by liberals, claims the NRA was founded as a civil rights organization (it was actually started by Civil War veterans to improve soldiers' marksmanship), and has said, "Black Americans are doing worse off economically today than we were doing in the 1950s under Jim Crow,” to downplay the threat of white supremacy.

Continue Reading
 

DC Report

Now Betsy DeVos is telling colleges what to teach

Published

on

I’m delighted to learn that everything must be fine with America’s public schools, with student loans and debts, with the growth of community colleges, with affirmative action in our school communities, with a healthy diversity, school assaults and shootings, fair pay, teacher satisfaction and childcare issues.

I know this because otherwise, I would have no explanation for why Education Secretary Betsy DeVos would have time to interfere with the content of college abroad classes.

Last week, the Education Department ordered Duke University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to remake their Middle East studies program run jointly by the two schools because it isn’t offering a positive-enough image of Judaism and Christianity in that part of the world.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Investigate and Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image