Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump hit with bipartisan backlash after pushing to ban all Muslim immigration

Published

on

By Sabrina Siddiqui and Ben Jacobs

Jeb Bush and Chris Christie join Democrats in denouncing proposal — but Ted Cruz stops short of criticizing Republican frontrunner

Donald Trump’s proposal to ban all Muslim immigration into the US, including that of tourists, was met with an immediate and massive backlash from across the political spectrum.

Republican presidential candidates moved quickly to condemn their party’s frontrunner, with Jeb Bush describing Trump as “unhinged” and Lindsey Graham calling on everyone seeking the presidency to denounce the plan. Even former vice-president Dick Cheney, as the Republican establishment began to chime in, told a conservative radio host the call “goes against everything we believe in.”

“Donald Trump today took xenophobia and religious bigotry to a new level,” Graham told the Guardian in an interview shortly after Trump unveiled his proposal.

READ: CNN guest makes bizarre comparison between Trump’s Muslim ban and MLK civil rights marches

ADVERTISEMENT

“His comments are hurting the war effort and putting our diplomats and soldiers serving in the Middle East at risk. The way to win this war is to reach to the vast majority of people in Islamic faith who reject Isil and provide them the capability to resist this ideology.”

Bush, the former Florida governor, responded on Twitter:

New Jersey governor Chris Christie said Trump’s comments reflected “a ridiculous position and one that won’t even be productive”.

“We do not need to resort to that type of activity nor should we,” Christie told conservative radio show host Matt Medved. “We need to cooperate with peaceful Muslim Americans who want to give us intelligence against those who are radicalized.”

“To ban Muslims from entering the country is just someone who is speaking from no experience,” he added. “There are folks in this race that don’t care what the law says because they are used to firing people indiscriminately. You do not need to be banning Muslims from the country.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Ohio governor John Kasich, one of the more vocal critics of Trump, was quick to reject his proposal.

“This is just more of the outrageous divisiveness that characterizes his every breath and another reason why he is entirely unsuited to lead the United States,” Kasich said.

Florida senator Marco Rubio was among the last of the presidential candidates to weigh in, but tweeted his disapproval of Trump’s plan.

“I disagree with Donald Trump’s latest proposal. His habit of making offensive and outlandish statements will not bring Americans together,” Rubio wrote. “The next President better be somebody who can unite our country to face the great challenges of the 21st Century.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Graham further added that every candidate should condemn Trump’s statement and specifically singled out Texas senator Ted Cruz.

“It is time for Ted Cruz to quit hiding in the weeds and speak out against Donald Trump’s xenophobia and racial bigotry,” Graham said.

But Cruz and a handful of other Republican contenders were unwilling to denounce Trump.

Cruz, who is competing neck-and-neck with Trump in the early voting state of Iowa, said “that is not my policy” when a reporter raised the topic on the campaign trail.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Listen, I don’t believe most Americans are using language against Muslim Americans. We are using language against radical Islamic terrorists, but I am going to focus on language I use,” Cruz said.

“I believe the focus should focus on radical Islamic terrorism and we need to be directly focused on threats to the United States. We need a commander-in-chief that perceives what the threat is and targets all of our resources against radical Islamic terrorists.”

Graham said Cruz’s response was insufficient.“It is time for Ted Cruz to quit hiding in the weeds and speak out against Donald Trump’s xenophobia and racial bigotry,” Graham said.

The presidential campaign of Kentucky senator Rand Paul initially declined to comment, then issued a statement that did not explicitly criticize Trump. Instead, it drew attention to Paul’s own legislation designed to block visitors from Muslim majority countries.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Senator Rand Paul has led on the issue of border security, proposing real solutions. That’s why earlier this month he introduced legislation to block visitors and immigrants from nations with known radical elements while a new system is developed to screen properly,” campaign spokesman Sergio Gor wrote.

Ben Carson said everyone visiting the country should be registered and monitored during their stay, as is the policy of other countries. But the retired neurosurgeon, who said earlier this year that the US should not elect a Muslim president, did not embrace Trump’s plan. “We do not and would not advocate being selective on one’s religion,” Carson said.

Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina linked Trump’s comments to Barack Obama’s nationwide address on Sunday on the fight against Isis.

“Unfortunately, Donald Trump’s overreaction is as dangerous as Obama’s under-reaction,” Fiorina said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Democrats immediately pounced on Trump’s release, with several lawmakers dubbing it fascism.

Former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley tweeted:

Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said:

Vermont senator Bernie Sanders also responded on Twitter, saying Trump and others “want us to hate all Muslims.”

“The US is a strong nation when we stand together. We are weak when we allow racism and xenophobia to divide us. cc: @realDonaldTrump,” Sanders wrote. “Demagogues throughout our history have attempted to divide us based on race, gender, sexual orientation or country of origin.”

A top aide to Barack Obama said Trump’s proposal was “totally contrary to our values as Americans”.

“It’s also contrary to our security,” Ben Rhodes, the White House’s deputy national security advisor, said during an appearance on CNN. “We should be making it harder for Isil to portray this as a war between the United States and Islam, not easier.”

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump was ready to ‘blow up everything’: Biographer Michael Wolff on why Mueller didn’t indict

Published

on

It is not an easy task to discern the truth when confronting a president and his allies who have created their own reality, one in which truth and lies have no absolute meaning and are, for them, ultimately interchangeable.

Donald Trump does this on a personal level: he has lied at least 10,000 times while president.

During his recent interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos, Donald Trump continued to lie in public, asserting that he did not try to fire special sounsel Robert Mueller. As multiple sources and witnesses agree, this is not true. Trump also asserted that he can do anything that he wants, according to the Constitution: He apparently believes he is a king or emperor. This too is a lie. The Constitution grants the president no such powers, and was drafted by the framers to stop demagogues and would-be tyrants such as Donald Trump.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

CNN panel destroys Trump’s mass arrest threat of millions as a wildly unrealistic Orlando rally stunt

Published

on

The panel on CNN's New Day cast a jaundiced eye at a threat Donald Trump made on Monday night where he threatened mass arrests of millions of immigrant families as part of an ICE operation.

On Twitter, the president wrote: "Next week ICE will begin the process of removing the millions of illegal aliens who have illicitly found their way into the United States. They will be removed as fast as they come in. Mexico, using their strong immigration laws, is doing a very good job of stopping people."

According to one panelist on CNN, the president's threat was timed as a political stunt, with the contributor Jackie Kucinich calling it "rally-fodder" before his Orlando campaign kickoff.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump’s ‘no collusion’ lie is finally falling apart — but will Americans actually notice?

Published

on

Although the Mueller Report has been in the public domain for nearly two months, there’s still a ton of confusion and disinformation around it. The confusion is specifically due to two things: Very few voters have actually read it, and Donald Trump is delighted to exploit that fact. It doesn’t help that Robert Mueller has been more than a little cryptic about his findings — refusing to answer questions or to appear for congressional testimony to clear the air.

Consequently, the president and his Red Hat loyalists continue to repeat the “NO COLLUSION!' lie with very little push-back. The all-caps falsehood gains momentum every time Trump repeats it. Likewise, Bill Barr’s March 24 letter and his subsequent public remarks erroneously confirmed Trump’s lie before anyone, including Congress, was allowed to actually read the report.

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

I need your help.

Investigating Trump's henchmen is a full time job, and I'm trying to bring in new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have more stories coming you'll love. Join me and help restore the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link

Investigating Trump is a full-time job, and I want to add new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have stories coming you'll love. Join me and go ad-free, while restoring the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link