Quantcast
Connect with us

Christian groups claim religious right to hide medical options from pregnant women

Published

on

The East County Pregnancy Care Clinic is another crisis pregnancy center in southern California. Just east of San Diego in a working class neighborhood, the clinic advertises “free pregnancy testing” but like many other CPCs what they really offer is an anything-but-abortion service to women in need of health care and answers.

According to a report from the New York Times, the state of California is in a First Amendment legal battle with these facilities that are primarily operated or funded by religious institutions or ideological activists who fight a woman’s right to choose. The California legislature passed a bill recently that requires these facilities to post a notice that affordable abortion services and contraception are available from public programs with the phone number women can call.

Some of these facilities have been caught over the years deliberately distributing misinformation to women seeking care or counsel. They have come up with stories about everything from birth control secreting artificial hormones into your uterus, to a bogus underground fetus market, to false claims that abortions can increase the risk of breast cancer or lead to mental health issues.

Of the 170 to 200 CPCs in California, only 70 are officially licensed by the state, meaning they have nurses on staff and are under the purview of an actual doctor. So, putting a notice in their window is contrary to everything CPCs stand for and they’re fighting the new California law by refusing to comply.

“I don’t want to put up a sign telling you where you can go for an abortion,”Josh McClure, the executive director of the East County clinic told The New York Times. “The sign is not up here now because it’s unconstitutional.” McClure is just one of several plaintiffs fighting the law in court.

California is not the only one seeking to regulate the crisis pregnancy industry. In 2014, New York City passed a similar regulation that CPCs must post signs that advertise whether or not they have a licensed medical provider on staff. The 2nd U.S. Court of Appeals kept that provision of the law in place but struck down parts of the law that required the CPCs to say up front that they didn’t provide abortions.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the New York Times, a First Amendment regulation is nearly impossible to uphold but statements of fact about licensed professionals on the premises, like the New York City law, have proven successful for regulating these clinics.

 

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

The NRA hired a CFO who was caught embezzling: report

Published

on

Wilson "Woody" Phillips, Jr. once worked at an employee-benefits consulting firm that was supposed to pay $45,000 to a Texas company. Yet, somehow, the money was rerouted.

According to a report from The New Yorker, when the companies were going back and forth about where the missing $45,000 went, they realized it had been routed to an account in Maryland, under the name of Hughes.

“They gave me records saying who the account belonged to,” accounts-payable manager Mary Hughes recalled in an interview. “And, sure enough, it was Woody’s.”

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Russian-American businessman at heart of Trump Tower Moscow project will testify to Congress on Friday

Published

on

On Wednesday, the Washington Post reported that Felix Sater, the Russian-American real-estate developer at the center of the proposal to build a Trump Tower project in Moscow in 2016, will testify before the House Intelligence Committee in a closed-door hearing on Friday.

Sater, in addition to working on the planning for Trump Tower Moscow, escorted Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr. to Russia during the preliminary stages of the project, which never came to fruition.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

John Bolton just got put in his place: report

Published

on

National Security Adviser John Bolton has wanted a war with Iran since long before many Americans were even born. But according to The Daily Beast, he might be losing the internal battle to go to war.

After the Pentagon announced that they had "evidence" that Iran attacked an oil tanker in the Gulf of Oman, political analysts began to speculate it would be used as a justification for war with Iran. But apparently, Trump realized the Middle East saber-rattling doesn't play well in Middle America.

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

I need your help.

Investigating Trump's henchmen is a full time job, and I'm trying to bring in new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have more stories coming you'll love. Join me and help restore the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link

Investigating Trump is a full-time job, and I want to add new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have stories coming you'll love. Join me and go ad-free, while restoring the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link