Quantcast
Connect with us

CIA torture victims’ lawsuit will move forward after federal judge’s ruling

Published

on

By Maria L. La Ganga

CIA torture victims who were subjected to some of the most brutal interrogation techniques of post-9/11 era

A federal judge in eastern Washington state ruled Friday for the first time ever that a civil lawsuit brought by victims of the CIA torture program can move forward.

After hearing attorneys for the two contract psychologists who created the torture program post up against American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) lawyers representing three victims of the program’s most brutal techniques, senior federal judge Justin L Quackenbush said he could not dismiss the case.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I cannot summarily dismiss the complaint plaintiffs have filed,” Quackenbush said before the two-hour hearing had even ended. “It’s thorough to say the least. On its face, the complaint alleges not only aiding and abetting but participation and complicity in the administration of this enhanced interrogation program.”

Attorneys for the three victims – one of whom froze to death while being tortured at a CIA black site – were jubilant and a little disbelieving after the hearing ended Friday.

“This has never happened before,” said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU’s national security project. “There have been so many cases brought by torture victims, Iraq, Afghanistan, elsewhere, and not one of them has been able to go forward for shameful reasons. This is a very big deal for our clients.”

The ACLU filed the suite on behalf of Suleiman Abdullah Salim, a Tanzanian fisherman; Mohamed Ahmed Ben Soud, a Libyan who was living in exile from Muammar Gaddafi’s regime; and Gul Rahman, an Afghan refugee who died of hypothermia while undergoing so-called “enhanced interrogation”.

Although they were held for years and subjected to what their lawsuit describes as “war crimes”, the three men were never accused of being members of al-Qaida. They were never charged with any crimes. They were left with serious psychological and physical injuries but have received no compensation from the US government.

ADVERTISEMENT

The victims’ civil lawsuit alleges that psychologists James Elmer Mitchell and John “Bruce” Jessen, independent contractors hired by the CIA, designed a brutal torture program that amounted to a “joint criminal enterprise”.

Over the course of five years, 119 men were abused using their techniques; the three plaintiffs in the suit were among the 39 subjected to the most harsh torture and scientific experimentation, which included anal penetration, mock execution, being doused with icy cold water, and enduring something akin to waterboarding.

In 2012, the Department of Justice announced that CIA officials responsible for the torture regime would not face criminal charges.

ADVERTISEMENT

The case opened with Quackenbush asking whether it mattered who made the decisions in the torture program.

“Is there evidence in this case that the president of the United States of America specifically authorized the activities?” he asked.

ADVERTISEMENT

James Smith, attorney for the defendants, responded: “Ultimately the CIA was authorized by the president of the United States to take these actions.”

Quackenbush pressed about whether the president had actually given the orders.

Smith: “I haven’t had the opportunity to take depositions in this case.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Quackenbush expressed annoyance that neither the attorneys for the psychologists nor the victims had read the contract between the CIA and the torture program’s architects, implying that the document would possibly clear up critical questions, including who picked the victims, who decided which techniques to use, and who was in charge.

The mysterious contract loomed large throughout the proceedings in department 903, where the defendants had three grey-suited attorneys present, the plaintiffs had four and a single lawyer sat alone at a table representing the DoJ.

Neither the two living plaintiffs nor the two defendants were present.

ACLU attorney Dror Ladin argued that “even if they produce a contract … the decisions implicated by that contract are not beyond this court’s ability to review. … It would be premature to decide whether they were acting 100% within the letter.”

ADVERTISEMENT

And he insisted that “what defendants seek in dismissing this case is a blank check … nowhere in the authorization for the use of military force does it say you may torture prisoners.”

Quackenbush responded: “But if the military tortured people there is no civil remedy” like the one the three men who filed the suit are seeking.

Ladin told the court that Mitchell and Jessen “were not part of any military chain of command. They were independent contractors selling their expertise to the CIA. … This is not a case about combat. It’s about three men who were kidnapped in foreign countries.”

As the case moved one step closer to a possible trial, Quackenbush ordered attorneys for both sides and the DoJ to come up with a plan in the next 30 days that would guide evidence collection; depositions of the victims, the psychologists and others; and the handling of classified information.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The judge has said these are claims that can go forward,” said a delighted Ladin. “They will be decided on the facts of this case, which has never happened.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Rather than leading — he lies’: MSNBC panel says Trump is a ‘danger to the country’ because he can’t be trusted

Published

on

MSNBC commentators, former assistant US Attorney Maya Wiley and Rick Wilson, explained that President Donald Trump's most significant barrier is making it past his own lies to save America from the coronavirus.

"There's a case tonight being tested in Walton County, Florida. The heart of Trump country," said Wilson, referring to the panhandle county east of Pensacola. "That's not going to be something you can just walk away from if it turns out to be a real case. We're seeing these things popping up all over. The safe bet was always to say, 'This could be bad. We'll do everything we can to stop it.' But he can't stop himself from self-aggrandizing and lying about things. And it's actually -- setting aside my normal criticism of Trump -- this is a danger to the country that he is not a trustworthy person for the American people. Even people who like him now he BS's them all the time. Now, if he says it's not a problem and people are being hospitalized, it is a problem."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump ‘just wants this problem to go away’: President desperate to get coronavirus ‘off his plate’

Published

on

President Donald Trump is desperate for the coronavirus problem to go away, and he doesn't exactly care how it happens.

According to New York Times reporter Annie Karni, sources are telling her that the biggest concern Trump has is more about the markets than the deaths of Americans from the virus.

"First, let's establish, this is a president who tried to change science with a Sharpie when it came to hurricane path prediction," said MSNBC host Brian Williams. "That picture lasts forever."

"Even his allies on Fox and his allies outside the White House were kind of channeling to that proverbial audience of one that this was a great opportunity to look presidential and to tell the facts," said Karni. The Donald Trump we saw out there in the briefing room was very casual, kind of left the facts to the other people that accompanied him out there. But he clearly publicly and privately just wants this problem to go away. He wants to downplay it. He thinks -- he has called people who are talking about fears about it alarmist. He doesn't want to be alarmist, and he's kind of holding on to any comment that makes it sound like this will naturally be a problem that is removed from his plate. That's what we saw publicly, and that's what he's been saying privately as well."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Seth Meyers: You know Trump isn’t the chief law enforcement officer because he couldn’t pass the physical

Published

on

"Late Night" host Seth Meyers warned that the United States is sliding into authoritarianism under President Donald Trump.

Sounding the alarm Wednesday evening, Meyers cited reports that Trump was making lists of disloyal people, purging them from their jobs, hiring unqualified cronies in top posts, and claiming he has the right to interfere in criminal cases.

While speaking to the press last week, Trump even announced that he's allowed to be involved in all criminal cases because he's the chief law enforcement officer of the United States. It's actually a title used for the attorney general.

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image