Quantcast
Connect with us

Supreme Court deadlock kills Obama’s executive action on immigration

Published

on

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday dealt President Barack Obama a harsh defeat, splitting 4-4 over his plan to spare millions of immigrants in the country illegally from deportation and give them work permits, leaving intact a lower-court ruling blocking the plan.

The court, with four conservative justices and four liberals, appeared divided along ideological lines during oral arguments on April 18 in a case brought by 26 states led by Texas that sued to block Obama’s 2014 executive action on immigration that bypassed Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 4-4 ruling was possible because there are only eight justices following February’s death of conservative Antonin Scalia.

The states argued that Obama overstepped the powers granted to him by the U.S. Constitution by infringing upon the authority of Congress.

“Today’s decision keeps in place what we have maintained from the very start: one person, even a president, cannot unilaterally change the law. This is a major setback to President Obama’s attempts to expand executive power, and a victory for those who believe in the separation of powers and the rule of law,” said Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican.

Republican U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan said the ruling “makes the president’s executive action on immigration null and void.” Ryan described the decision as a “major victory in our fight to restore the separation of powers.”

The Constitution assigns certain powers to the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the federal government.

ADVERTISEMENT

Obama’s plan was blocked by lower courts and never went into effect.

Obama’s plan was tailored to let roughly 4 million people – those who have lived illegally in the United States at least since 2010, have no criminal record and have children who are U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents – get into a program that shields them from deportation and supplies work permits.

The court did not issue a ruling on the merits of the main legal question. Therefore, its action set no legal precedent to bind future presidents. The decision indicates that any major immigration policy change that would address the long-term situation of the estimated 11 million people in the country illegally would have to be enacted by Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

This was not the first time that the Supreme Court determined the fate of an important Obama initiative. The justices in 2012 and 2015 issued high-profile rulings preserving his signature healthcare law that Republicans have long fought.

The case was viewed as an important test of the limits of presidential powers and came near the end of the Obama presidency that has been defined by unceasing fights with Republicans in Congress and in state capitals who have fought countless initiatives of the president.

ADVERTISEMENT

The issue of illegal immigration has featured prominently in the campaign ahead of the Nov. 8 U.S. presidential election. Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, has called for deportation of all immigrants in the United States illegally – most of them from Mexico and other Latin American countries.

After the states filed suit and shortly before Obama’s plan was to go into effect last year, a federal judge in Texas blocked it in February 2015. The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision in November.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

South Carolina Republicans gather for an ‘active rejection’ of social distancing measures: report

Published

on

On Friday, The New York Times reported on a gathering of Republicans in Conway, South Carolina that appeared to be an "active rejection" of social distancing measures and other public health guidelines.

"The outdoor gathering here on Thursday was a send-off event for Cleo Steele, a longtime Republican Party operative in Horry County, who is retiring to Ohio," wrote Astead Herndon. "Speakers shared the same microphone. Local and state political candidates greeted voters with handshakes and squeezed tight for pictures. Of all the people gathered outside the county Republican office — many of them senior citizens — fewer than a dozen wore masks."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Paul Krugman: A stronger GDP won’t help Americans if they’re dead

Published

on

Liberal economist Paul Krugman, in his New York Times column, has been stressing that the better a job the United States does with social distancing policies now, the better off the U.S. economy will be in the long run. In his Thursday column, Krugman warns that a premature reopening could hurt the U.S. both economically and from a health standpoint.

“America is now engaged in a vast, dangerous experiment,” Krugman writes. “Although social distancing has limited the spread of the coronavirus, it is far from contained. Yet despite warnings from epidemiologists, much of the country is moving to open up for business as usual.”

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Elon Musk mocked after Starship explosion: ‘Maybe have NASA handle rockets’

Published

on

Billionaire Elon Musk was the target of jokes on Twitter after his company SpaceX suffered a rocket explosion.

"SpaceX just experienced the biggest explosion yet at its Texas site, where it's testing prototypes for a Mars rocket," Marina Koren of The Atlantic reported.

"A resident who lives nearby—just 2 miles away—said it felt like an earthquake," she added.

https://twitter.com/bubbaprog/status/1266451354861686784

Musk was ridiculed following the blast. Here's some of what people were saying:

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image