Quantcast
Connect with us

Getting away with murder in Pakistan: Examining the roots of honor killings

Published

on

The strangling of Pakistani social media starlet Qandeel Baloch by her brother has once again cast a spotlight on the custom of “honour killings”, which claims around a thousand lives in Pakistan every year.

What are honour killings?

So-called honour killings are understood to mean the murder of a relative by another for bringing the family dishonour.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pattern of crime has its roots in tribal social norms that remain prevalent across South Asia, and the victims are overwhelmingly women.

There were 933 honour killing cases in 2015, according to Pakistan’s Federal Ministry of Law, but these may only represent a fraction of the true number.

Why do people so often get away with it?

The apparent rise in killings in recent years is largely linked to Pakistan’s criminal code, which is a mixture of British-inherited law and Islamic custom based on Sharia introduced by military ruler Zia-ul-Haq.

In 1990, two years after Zia’s death, government introduced the Qisas (blood money) and Diyat (retribution) law, allowing murderers to avoid jail by seeking forgiveness from a victim’s relatives — a convenient means of escape particularly in honour cases.

In his book, “The Application of Islamic Criminal Law in Pakistan: Sharia in Practice”, legal scholar Tahir Wasti compared the decade 1981-1990, before the law, to 1991-2000.

ADVERTISEMENT

He found that the number of murder victims increased by more than a third in districts around the city of Multan, near where Baloch was killed — well above the population growth rate of around three percent in the area.

More startling still, the law “brought about a particularly visible change in the rate of cancellation of cases” — from six percent to 12 percent — as police encouraged parties to enter blood-money compromises.

Wasti said the laws had a “disconcerting” effect on the number of killings within families, “especially the honour killings of women”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Why is Qandeel’s case significant?

Baloch, whose real name was Fauzia Azeem, was from the conservative working class, making her decision to openly embrace her sexuality in defiance of the prevailing patriarchy all the more bold.

She unapologetically tackled what she saw as religious hypocrisy, posing for selfies with a senior government cleric who she said had sought a meeting despite publicly criticising her.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I thought I would expose him as he is in reality,” she told AFP at the time.

In one of her last posts, she wrote: “As women we must stand up for ourselves… I LOVE THE WAY I AM.”

Activists told AFP that in a country where violence against women is all too common, she had put a “face” to honour killings, and progressives fear her death will embolden would-be murderers.

ADVERTISEMENT

What is being done about it?

Pakistan amended its criminal code in 2005 to prevent men who kill female relatives pardoning themselves as an “heir” of the victim.

But punishment is left to a judge’s discretion when other relatives of the victim forgive the killer — a loophole which critics say remains exploited.

In February, Prime Minister Sharif promised to amend the criminal code further, but no action has been taken since.

Opposition senator Sherry Rehman, a prominent women’s rights activist, has been trying to amend the bill but requires the votes of Sharif’s ruling party.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think they are pandering to the religious parties,” she told AFP last month, referring to Pakistan’s influential Islamist opposition.

In Baloch’s case, at least, it seems unlikely the killers will go unpunished: her brother Muhammad Wasim had admitted to the crime, is in police custody, and his parents appear to want him to face justice.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Angry’ Trump Michigan voters admit they want ‘this nightmare to end’ in November

Published

on

President Donald Trump's Michigan supporters are abandoning their 2016 pick for Vice President Joe Biden as the election comes closer.

In a series of interviews on MSNBC Sunday, revisited voters they'd met earlier in the election cycle in Kent County.

Katey Morse and her husband were both working full time, and their kids were in school back in March, but things quickly changed as the coronavirus spread throughout the country. Luckily, she and her husband didn't lose their jobs, but they, like many parents, are struggling to do virtual school for their kids.

"I'm turning into more of an angry person than I've ever been in my life," she said about how she feels politically, noting that it makes her sad. "I've just got a countdown to November now, and I'm hoping we'll wake up from this nightmare we're in."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump abusing the intelligence community in an attempt to keep them quiet about Russia election hacks: Conservative

Published

on

The New York Times Magazine piece outlining President Donald Trump's battles with the U.S. intelligence community revealed that Russia is continuing to wage its own cyberwar against the world. According to conservative Washington Post columnist Max Boot, the devastating report explained the extent to which the president is ignoring the threats to the 2020 election.

“The options faced by the intelligence community during Trump’s presidency have been stark: avoid infuriating the president but compromise the agencies’ ostensible independence, or assert that independence and find yourself replaced with a more sycophantic alternative," wrote Robert Draper in his lengthy investigation into Trump's efforts to politicize international intelligence. According to Boot, the most shocking part of the investigation was that the experts in the intelligence community have been banned from speaking honestly about the Russian attacks.

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

‘Incompetent moron’ Chuck Todd ripped for letting Trump official claim Democrats want more COVID-19 deaths

Published

on

"Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd is under fire -- once again -- after letting Donald Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro claim on NBC that Democrats want more Americans to die during the coronavirus pandemic to boost their chances at the polls in November.

Instead of pushing back the NBC host known for his lack of follow-up questions let the comment slide by responding, "I take your point."

Todd's failure to call out the Trump aide for what one Twitter commenter called a "disgusting" comment led to an avalanche of criticism for the MBC political director who recently saw his weekday show cut back to make room for more commentary by colleague Nicolle Wallace.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image