Quantcast
Connect with us

‘Policing for profit’: South Carolina cops have raked in $23 million in property seizures in 5 years

Published

on

Civil asset forfeiture has become increasingly controversial in recent years, as we’ve seen several stories of law enforcement officials abusing their authority to seize suspects’ property that they allege was involved in a crime.

South Carolina news station WYFF 4 reports that police departments in the state have raked in an estimated $22.7 million in property seizures over the last five years alone.

ADVERTISEMENT

This estimate earned South Carolina a “D-” grade from the Institute for Justice, a group that advocates against abuse of the civil forfeiture system.

“South Carolina is more focused on policing for profit, taking money off the streets, than it is for arresting bad guys and getting drugs off the street,” Institute for Justice managing attorney Lee McGrath told WYFF 4. “A person does not need to be charged or even convicted of a crime to lose their property. You can be acquitted of a charge in criminal court, but still lose your property through civil forfeiture.”

Groups such as the Institute for Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union have been campaigning to reform civil forfeiture procedures to make sure that police aren’t simply swiping property from suspects to fund their departments.

McGrath points out that states such as Florida, Nebraska and New Mexico have made real reforms to their asset forfeiture policies, although there are a lot of states left such as South Carolina that are in dire need of reforms.

South Carolina isn’t the exception to the rule either — as the Institute for Justice’s state-by-state rankings make clear, the vast majority of states in the country received “D” grades or worse.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Russia is delighted’: Maddow says the elephant in the room is ‘rearing up and stomping its feet’

Published

on

The host of "The Rachel Maddow Show" on MSNBC broke down how all of President Donald Trump's decisions in the Ukraine scandal primarily benefited Russia.

"We are in the middle of this impeachment now and it is still unfolding and there is still more to learn and tomorrow is going to be — tomorrow should be a big deal," Maddow noted. "Even just the news tonight is a big deal."

"But even after one day of public hearings so far, the elephant in the room here feels like it’s rearing up and stomping its feet, because who benefits with all these things Trump has done?" Maddow asked. "With all of them. With all this stuff in the middle of the impeachment, but all the other stuff he’s doing simultaneously."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump begs Louisiana for a ‘big win’ after his last-minute rally in Kentucky backfired

Published

on

At his last-ditch rally in Louisiana to help the struggling gubernatorial candidacy of GOP businessman Eddie Rispone, President Donald Trump boasted — incorrectly — that his rally in Kentucky narrowed the gap for Gov. Matt Bevin, who lost the race, by 19 points. He then begged voters to give Rispone a "big win."

"We elected everybody," said Trump. "The governor got brought up, in a few short days, 19 points. I went, we made a speech, the whole ticket was there, everybody won big. Governor's a really good guy. But 19 points is a big thing, and he lost by just a few thousand votes. And the headlines next day, Trump took a loss — I lifted him up a lot. But Trump took a loss. So you gotta give me a big win, please, okay? Okay?"

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Roger Stone’s health in question as prosecutors have him ‘dead to rights’: NBC reporter

Published

on

Jurors deciding the fate of longtime Donald Trump political advisor Roger Stone did not reach a verdict during their deliberations on Thursday and will reconvene on Friday morning.

But there were fascinating details from the courtroom revealed by NBC News correspondent Ken Dilanian.

"What about Roger Stone, does he look like he’s about to burn here?" MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews asked. "Does he look like he’s going down?"

"He does," Dilanian replied.

"And also, physically, he doesn't look well at this trial. He’s walking around the courthouse kind of unaccompanied, shambling around," he continued. "He doesn't look like a happy warrior, which is usually his persona."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image