California is a Democratic bastion in the United States, but the party’s presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has some voters up in arms over her push to tighten gun control.
At the LAX Firing Range in Los Angeles, the idea of further restrictions on guns is by and large shot down.
Jim Tarbin, a retired Los Angeles Police Department officer, said that gun owners feel “besieged” in California. “There is no question about it,” he told AFP.
John, an employee at the firing range who did not want his last name published, said: “Gun owners in California cannot express themselves — they’re always outvoted.”
California has the strictest gun control in the country, according to specialist site Smartgunlaws.org. Rules range from compulsory background checks to limits on the capacity of firearm magazines and a ban on automatic weapons.
New measures to control access to guns are expected to be approved in a referendum coinciding with the November 8 presidential election, as public polls show two-thirds of voters want them.
Clinton, vying to be the first female US president, has promised to confront the powerful gun lobby and broaden background checks to include legal as well as mental issues.
According to her campaign, Clinton “will also support work to keep military-style weapons off our streets.”
Her Republican rival Donald Trump touts the Second Amendment of the US Constitution in his campaign, declaring: “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed upon. Period.”
Between eight and 11 million Californians are gunowners, according to estimates, about a quarter of the population — the second-highest number after Texas.
A Pew Research study found that 40 percent of gun owners across the United States are Republican, twice the number of Democrats. But in California, the share of gun-toting Democrats is larger.
“We believe there’s an immense number of Democrats among California gun owners,” said Sam Paredes, executive director of Gun Owners of California, noting there were no official statistics on that.
As for Clinton, he warned that “people are upset she is so aggressive on guns and it will show at the polls.”
Another employee at the LAX Firing Range, Justin Frew, 30 and sporting a full-blown “hipster” beard, said: “I enjoy firing guns.”
Frew said he was afraid about tighter laws “because it is mostly people who have never fired guns who are limiting my rights.”
Adolphus Beal, a retired set dresser for television shows, declared: “I am a Democrat. I still agree that people should have the right to own a gun.”
– ‘Gunmaggedon’ –
While the vast majority of gun owners in California support measures like background checks and even obligatory gun education, they bristle at anything that limits the type or quantity of pistols, rifles and ammunition that can be bought by law-abiding citizens.
And that includes the controversial semi-automatic weapons used in the attacks in San Bernardino, California, in December — 14 people killed — or in Orlando, Florida, in June — 49 victims — or in Paris last November — 130 dead.
Asked about the Orlando massacre, Frew replied: “The gay club? I am gay. I do not believe it is the firearm’s fault. I do not feel that semi-automatic rifles should be restricted.”
Paul Danner, an assistant television director, pointed out that criminals can find many ways to do harm.
“In France, they used a truck in Nice, in the Boston bombing they used pressure cookers” rigged with explosives, Danner said.
According to Smartgunlaws.org, California laws have slashed in half the number of gun victims in the past 25 years.
In what some consider to be a climate increasingly hostile to those who own firearms, “a lot of people are already moving out of state… to more gun-friendly states like Nevada or Arizona or New Mexico,” said Frew.
Facing a possible “gunmaggedon” of tighter restrictions, sales of guns and ammunition have jumped in California in recent months.
David Baranco, a 38-year-old Democrat and graphic designer, recently bought his first pistol.
“I think guns will end up being outlawed in California,” he said. “I wanted to try it. It’s part of our country’s history.”
Giuliani’s latest trip to Ukraine opened a new door for prosecutors to go after Trump: MSNBC analyst
On MSNBC Saturday afternoon, legal analyst Danny Cevallos explained how Rudy Giuliani's trip to Ukraine to produce anti-impeachment propaganda could end up harming his legal position — by muddying attorney-client privilege with President Donald Trump.
"The only path to legitimacy is if there was a true corruption threat in Ukraine, and specifically if Hunter Biden and Burisma posed a true corruption threat," said Cevallos. "That is why Rudy Giuliani is in Ukraine. He's building that case. So that he can show, bring a news network there, right-leaning news network to do a documentary or investigate this issue and yield factual information that Rudy Giuliani can point to and say, this corruption, this evidence, these facts show that President trump was warranted in requesting an investigation, not generally into corruption, specifically into Hunter Biden. It's the only path that will work for Republicans that passes even remotely any kind of smell test. Even then, it's a bit of a stretch."
Trump declares himself the ‘greatest of all presidents’ in manic tweetstorm attacking Pelosi and Democrats
Donald Trump broke out of his Twitter hibernation on Saturday afternoon just before flying off to Florida for a pair of fundraisers, and used the opportunity to declare himself the "greatest of all presidents."
Attacking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for not passing his signature trade bill, Trump then went after Democrats for trying to impeach him -- saying they were making a big mistake.
On Twitter, the president wrote: ""Hard to believe, but if Nancy Pelosi had put our great Trade Deal with Mexico and Canada, USMCA, up for a vote long ago, our economy would be even better. If she doesn’t move quickly, it will collapse!"
Donald Trump sounds like a complete lunatic because he’s isolated himself in a far-right media bubble
Welcome to another edition of What Fresh Hell?, Raw Story’s roundup of news items that might have become controversies under another regime, but got buried – or were at least under-appreciated – due to the daily firehose of political pratfalls, unhinged tweet storms and other sundry embarrassments coming out of the current White House.
If you have an older relative who spends way too much time stewing in the conservative media, you may have experienced a moment when you not only disagreed with him, but you realized that you had no earthly clue what he was going on about. Perhaps it was when he started talking about the UN plot to eliminate golf courses and replace paved roads with bicycle paths. Maybe he stopped you in your tracks with a discourse on why flies were attracted to Barack Obama, or complained about the government insisting on referring to Christians as "Easter-worshippers" or expressed outrage over 9/11 hijackers being given leniency by Muslim jurists.