Quantcast
Connect with us

Judge threatens Ammon Bundy’s lawyer with contempt for derailing conspiracy trial

Published

on

Ammon Bundy speaks at a press conference in Oregon (Screen grab)

Anti-government militant Ammon Bundy has an uphill climb in his federal conspiracy case, but now his own lawyer is angering the judge in the case.

According to OregonLive, U.S. District Judge Anna Brown told attorney Marcus Mumford that he would be held in contempt each time he refuses to comply with her orders. Evidently, Mumford tends to devolve into circumstances that surround the officer-involved shooting of Robert “LaVoy” Finicum in front of the jury.

ADVERTISEMENT

Judge Brown told Mumford from now on he’ll be fined $1,000 for each time he talks about the issue while questioning witnesses.

“I have ruled on this issue and it appears to me you disregard it,” Brown told Mumford after the jury left for a bathroom break Thursday morning.

“Do you understand what I’m saying … yes or no?” she asked. He tried to protest or explain but she cut him off demanding a simple answer.

“I don’t understand. Your honor says I’m asking improper questions?” Mumford asked.

The judge referenced Mumford’s questions to rancher Andy Dunbar, whose property connected to the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Mumford asked Dunbar what he learned on Jan. 26 about the shooting of Finicum.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You are not to do that,” Brown said.

“You’re telling me I’m allowed to inquire about the shooting, but not the circumstances of the shooting?” Mumford asked.

Anything about Finicum’s shooting death is off limits other than the date it occurred and that it occurred. The Bundy conspiracy case is a completely different case than the shooting death of Finicum.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I can understand the words,” Mumford told her.

“I hope you can comply,” the judge said.

ADVERTISEMENT

This last result comes days of Judge Brown admonishing Mumford during his cross-examinations. Prosecutors object each time and each time she sustains their objections to the questions as either “beyond the scope” of the investigation or irrelevant to the case. She encouraged any attorneys to take up their concerns outside the presence of the jury.

One of the militants in the case has already pleaded guilty to conspiracy.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump’s new anti-mask rhetoric is the last gasp of a ‘flailing campaign’: Paul Krugman

Published

on

In a column for the New York Times, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman pondered why Donald Trump is once again ramping up his anti-mask rhetoric at a time when his health care advisors are urging the public to keep wearing the protective coverings. He then concluded it is nothing less than a cynical political maneuver by the president that will likely lead to more deaths.

Earlier this week the head of the CDC urged Americans to keep using masks, saying it was their best defense against becoming infected with COVID-19 only to have the president undercut that message on the same day.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump’s campaign knows Arizona and Michigan have ‘slipped’ and ‘may be unrecoverable’: reporter

Published

on

Politico reporter Tim Alberta, a former National Review writer who is deeply sourced in the world of Republican politics, believes that President Donald Trump's campaign knows that it is quickly losing ground in two key swing states as it heads into the final stretch of the 2020 presidential election.

Writing on Twitter, Alberta says that Michigan and Arizona are two states that "Trump World knows have slipped, and may be unrecoverable" for the campaign. Additionally, he believes that Wisconsin, another state that Trump won unexpectedly in 2016, "isn't far behind."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump calls Howard Zinn’s work ‘propaganda’ — hear the legendary historian in his own words

Published

on

This week President Trump described the work of the legendary historian Howard Zinn, who died in 2010, as “propaganda” meant to “make students ashamed of their own history.” But Zinn believed the opposite, that teaching the unvarnished truth about history was the best way to combat propaganda and unexamined received wisdom. We air excerpts from a 2009 interview with Zinn in which he explained his approach to education. “We should be honest with young people; we should not deceive them. We should be honest about the history of our country,” Zinn said.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_L7U0R0oSM

Continue Reading