Quantcast
Connect with us

WATCH: Trump reveals his plans to punish media critics during incoherent TV interview

Published

on

Donald Trump has said in the past that he wants to change our country’s libel laws to make it easier for people like him to sue critical media outlets — and now we have a better idea of what he’s considering.

Per LawNewz, Trump this week told Miami-based television station WFOR-TV that he wants to change our libel laws so they’re a lot more like the ones in England that allow people to more easily sue media outlets for publishing or broadcasting false information.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Well in England they have a system where you can actually sue if someone says something wrong,” he said. “Our press is allowed to say whatever they want and get away with it.”

Trump then bizarrely tried to tout himself as a champion of the free press, even though he had just said that media outlets should get sued if “someone says something wrong.”

“I’m a big believer tremendous believer of the freedom of the press,” he said. “Nobody believes it stronger than me but if they make terrible, terrible mistakes and those mistakes are made on purpose to injure people. I’m not just talking about me I’m talking anybody else then yes, I think you should have the ability to sue them.”

What makes this so strange is that public figures already can sue media outlets if they can prove that false information was printed with either malice or reckless disregard for the truth. What Trump seemed to have been calling for earlier, however, was a looser standard that would apply to any incorrect information, regardless of whether it was published with intent to harm.

Later in the interview, Trump fumed that the government couldn’t force media outlets to publicly apologize to him for getting facts wrong.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Over here they don’t have to apologize,” said the candidate who has never once apologized for getting something wrong during his whole campaign. “They can say anything they want about you or me and there doesn’t have to be any apology.”

Watch the full interview below.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Elections 2016

Vietnamese women strive to clear war-era mines

Published

on

Inching across a field littered with Vietnam war-era bombs, Ngoc leads an all-women demining team clearing unexploded ordnance that has killed tens of thousands of people -- including her uncle.

"He died in an explosion. I was haunted by memories of him," Le Thi Bich Ngoc tells AFP as she oversees the controlled detonation of a cluster bomb found in a sealed-off site in central Quang Tri province.

More than 6.1 million hectares of land in Vietnam remain blanketed by unexploded munitions -- mainly dropped by US bombers -- decades after the war ended in 1975.

At least 40,000 Vietnamese have since died in related accidents. Victims are often farmers who accidentally trigger explosions, people salvaging scrap metal, or children who mistake bomblets for toys.

Continue Reading

Elections 2016

Chief Justice John Roberts issues New Year’s Eve warning to stand up for democracy

Published

on

In a progressive welcoming move, Chief Justice John Roberts issued his New Year's Eve annual report urging his fellow federal judges to stand up for democracy.

"In our age, when social media can instantly spread rumor and false information on a grand scale, the public's need to understand our government, and the protections it provides, is ever more vital," he wrote. "We should celebrate our strong and independent judiciary, a key source of national unity and stability."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump’s next 100 days will dictate whether he can be re-elected or not — here’s why

Published

on

According to CNN pollster-in-residence Harry Enten, Donald Trump's next 100 days -- which could include an impeachment trial in the Senate -- will hold the key to whether he will remain president in 2020.

As Eten explains in a column for CNN, "His [Trump's] approval rating has been consistently low during his first term. Yet his supporters could always point out that approval ratings before an election year have not historically been correlated with reelection success. But by mid-March of an election year, approval ratings, though, become more predictive. Presidents with low approval ratings in mid-March of an election year tend to lose, while those with strong approval ratings tend to win in blowouts and those with middling approval ratings usually win by small margins."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image