Quantcast
Connect with us

Here’s why prosecutors aren’t charging a white Tea Party activist with terrorism in violent anti-Muslim plot

Published

on

Prosecutors won’t refer to a former Tea Party activist as a “terrorist” during his trial on a variety of charges connected to a plot to attack a Muslim community hyped by right-wing media as a terrorism training camp.

Robert Doggart, a Christian National Church minister and failed congressional candidate from Tennessee, recruited social media users to join his planned violent attack on a mosque and residents at Islamberg, New York, according to federal prosecutors, reported the Times Free Press.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 65-year-old Doggart was arrested in 2015 after he was recorded speaking to a South Carolina militia member about his plot to burn down a mosque, school and other buildings — which he expected to turn deadly.

Prosecutors said Doggart gathered an M4 rifle, explosives, and light armor piercing bullets in connection with the plot, and investigators said he was recruiting snipers through social media and by telephone.

He pleaded guilty nearly two years ago to one count of interstate communication of threats, and he’s currently standing trial on one count of solicitation to commit arson of a building, one count of solicitation to commit a civil rights violation, and two counts of threat in interstate commerce.

However, a federal judge rejected his plea last year.

Attorneys for the Muslim enclave say Doggart wasn’t charged with any terrorism-related offenses because federal law doesn’t specifically address domestic terror threats, the newspaper reported.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tahirah Amatul-Wadud, an attorney for Islamberg, said prosecutors have charged Muslims with international terrorism charges if they’re accused of looking up websites associated with the Islamic State.

“Essentially, your charge is connected to something overseas,” Amatul-Wadud said.

Acts of domestic terrorism must involve the coercion of others or the intimidation of the government through mass destruction, and both must take place within U.S. jurisdiction.

ADVERTISEMENT

Amatul-Wadud and Tahirah Clark, who are representing Islamberg in a separate civil lawsuit against Doggart, said the conservative activist meets those qualifications — but they said prosecutors haven’t charged him under those statutes because they’re largely aimed at foreign groups.

Prosecutors were unable to charge Doggart under the terrorism statute because they said his attempts to seek a destructive device were too vague to meet the standard of proof — not because he was not Muslim, as some reports, including this one one, previously suggested.

ADVERTISEMENT

William Tore Tint, the South Carolina man recorded speaking to Doggart, pleaded guilty is September to making false statements to the FBI about the plot and was sentenced to three years of probation.

Amatul-Wadud and Clark argued that the weapons of mass destruction charge might have given the U.S. Attorney’s Office the justification to file terrorism-related charges, and the attorneys believe prosecutors tried but were unable under the existing statute.

The attorneys intend to lobby Congress to address the apparent double standard against black and Muslims charged under the terrorism statute.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Here is why these Nevadans are betting on Sanders

Published

on

LAS VEGAS — Any doubts that Nevadans wouldn't show up for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) were quickly squashed by the amount of people lined up to get into his Friday night rally in Las Vegas on the eve of the Nevada caucus: an estimated 2,020, according to his campaign. One would have been forgiven for assuming the crowd spilling out the main entrance and down the street had lined up to get into one of the city's hottest shows, not a "Get Out the Vote" event. Despite stereotypes that Sanders only draws support from the young (and mostly white), the crowd was visibly diverse in age, ethnicity and race. And anyone who didn't arrive already wearing the requisite Bernie gear had plenty of opportunities to buy some as they waited to enter the venue.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Roger Stone’s dream of booting judge for sentencing comments brutally crushed by ex-US Attorney: ‘He’s met his match’

Published

on

Appearing on MSNBC on Saturday afternoon, former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance crushed any hopes former Donald Trump associate Roger Stone might have that his prison sentence will be voided due to comments made by the presiding judge in his federal trial.

Speaking with host Alex Witt, Vance left no doubt Stone's latest legal gambit will collapse just like his previous attempts to squirm out of his trial did.

"Stone's legal team says that Judge Amy Berman Jackson's assertion that the jurors served with integrity shows bias," host Witt stated. "Do you buy that argument and legally would that be enough to get the judge dismissed from the case?"

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Justice Dept officials worry Bill Barr will fall quietly in line behind Trump after Stone interference: report

Published

on

According to a report from CNN, longtime Justice Department officials are concerned that Attorney General Bill Barr will do all he can to stay out of Donald Trump's sight and not interfere now that he was caught up in a squabble with the president over the sentencing of Trump associate Roger Stone.

CNN notes that Barr had previously watched Secretary of State Mike Pompeo be swept up in the president's Ukraine scandal -- damaging the State Department official's reputation -- and hoped to keep a low profile in the president's public disputes.

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image