A top Donald Trump adviser publicly supported a far-right, anti-Semitic militia known as “the Hungarian Guard,” Forward reports.
In 2007, Sebastian Gorka—who’s in the past been accused of Islamophobia and anti-Semitism—was a political leader in Hungarian “New Democratic Coalition,” known in Hungary as “UDK.” In a video uncovered by forward, Gorka can be seen supporting en extremist parliamentary force.
In the video, Gorka is asked if he supports a far-right anti-Semitic party known as Jobbik, which Forward reports was working on an initiative to establish the militia.
“That is so,” Gorka replied, telling the interviewer the establishment of a militia is “a big societal need.” He also berates the Hungarian military as “sick,” adding “this country cannot defend itself.”
According to Forward, the Guard was banned in 2009 after Hungary’s higher court ruled an anti-Roma march “violated the rights of the Hungarian Roma community.” Four years later, the European Court of Human Rights reaffirmed that ruling, describing the Guard as “essentially racist.
Despite Gorka’s controversial associations and past remarks, he remains Trump’s senior White House counterterrorism adviser. In a statement on Monday, Human Rights First called for the president to immediately dismiss Gorka.
“President Trump needs to fire Sebastian Gorka immediately,” Human Rights First Senior Vice President Rob Berschinski—who formerly worked as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor under the Barack Obama administration—said in a statement.
“The White House continues to harbor a man who has made a career out of associating with racists and antisemites, and who has expressed support for multiple groups that valorize Nazi-aligned governments in Hungary’s past,” Berschinski added. “It’s unconscionable and inexcusable. He needs to be shown the door tonight.”
Watch the video below, via Forward:
Don Lemon notes the GOP panic after their own witnesses gave testimony harming Trump: ‘Worried much?’
CNN anchor Don Lemon explained how witnesses called by Republicans in the impeachment inquiry destoryed the defenses employed by President Donald Trump and his allies.
"Now, let's just be honest, the shakedown -- that's exactly what it is -- the shakedown is exposed, people," Lemon said.
"And the evidence comes from the Republican's own witnesses," he noted. "The former envoy to Ukraine, Kurt Volker -- who resigned just one day after the release of the whistleblower's report -- telling the president's defenders exactly what they did not want to hear."
"They called him apparently expecting him to say what he said in his closed-door testimony, that he saw no evidence of a quid pro quo, or let's call it for what it is again -- a shakedown," he continued. "Well, now he says he was wrong."
Trump declares it was a ‘great day for the GOP’ — and is mercilessly ridiculed for his absurd claim
President Donald Trump responded to the end of the day's impeachment hearings by saying that it was a great day for the Republican Party and for the United States. There were many people who disagreed, however.
Every person who testified before Congress has said that Trump's obsession with Joe Biden was concerning enough to alert others. Even National Security Council aide Tim Morrison stressed that he didn’t believe there was anything inappropriate about the call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. But when Rep. Val Demmings (D-FL) asked him why then he felt the need to report it if there was nothing wrong, Morrison struggled to find an answer.
NSC aide Morrison flounders as lawmaker asks why he reported Trump’s phone call if he didn’t think it was a big deal
At the impeachment hearings on Tuesday, National Security Council aide Tim Morrison stressed that he didn't believe there was anything inappropriate about the call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. But when Rep. Val Demings (D-FL) asked him why he reported the call to government lawyers, he had no answer.
"You responded to a series of questions about the call and saw nothing wrong with it, yet you skipped your chain of command to go to legal counsel to find out — I guess to find out what to do, because you were concerned about the political fallout, not about anything being appropriate or wrong with the call, is that correct?" asked Demings.