The Baltimore City Department of Housing outsourced an emergency demolition of an old row house with a “bowing exterior wall” and massive crack in the wall to K&K Adams. Neighbors gathered to watch the blighted building finally taken down. That’s when they witnessed the excavator topple the building next door instead.
According to a Baltimore Sun report, 214 E. Fort Ave. partially collapsed in a matter of seconds, leaving only a cloud of dust and debris.
“We were like, ‘Oh my God!'” neighbor Lauren Singer said.
Attached buildings are demolished frequently in the east coast city, but not this one, and no one is revealing why.
“If a property presents an imminent danger, Baltimore City will take whatever action is necessary to protect the public, including emergency demolition,” Housing Department spokesperson Tania Baker said. “Precautions are always taken with adjacent properties, in this case ensuring that it was unoccupied.”
The building next door had not been condemned but Tyler Banks, the owner of TD Development and Charm City Builders explained that he was there for hours concerned about the building that was. He has no idea why the wrong building was torn down, noting he did a walk-through with the city inspectors days leading up to the mistake.
“I was there until about 2 in the morning, just worried about the whole situation, just wanting to make sure everyone was safe,” he said.
“I take a lot of pride in the work we do, so for me, the last thing I’d ever want to see is something like this happen,” Banks said about his renovation company.
His listing for the building called it “a larger-than-average Federal Hill unicorn rowhome” that is “under construction.” He explained it is considered a “unicorn” because of the size, location, off-street parking and roof deck. The renovation called for a four and a half bathroom makeover and they anticipated it being completed by August.
It is now a pile of dust.
Watch the video of the demolition below:
I was an impeachment skeptic. Here’s why I’m now convinced Trump must be removed
Despite all the uncertainty surrounding impeachment, we can capture the current moment succinctly: President Trump’s fate hinges on whether Republican senators are more fearful of losing in a primary or in the general election. Now that the live impeachment hearings are about to fuel nationwide prime-time programming, those senators’ fears are likely to intensify.
While that dynamic will determine whether Trump will be removed from office, it doesn’t tell us whether he should be. I am generally an impeachment skeptic. My recent book—Impeaching the President: Past, Present, Future—argues that impeachment should be regarded as a last resort that, as a general proposition, is inappropriate in a president’s first term. The American people are capable of rendering judgment and should be given the first crack.
Nicolle Wallace tells Colbert why she cursed at Fox News host Laura Ingraham — and that she left the GOP
MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace appeared on Stephen Colbert's "Late Show" Wednesday after spending hours analyzing the impeachment hearings that began that morning.
One of the first things Colbert asked about was the recent smackdown from Wallace about Fox News host Laura Ingraham and her guests going after Col. Alexander Vindman. Ingraham proposed that because Vindman was born in Ukraine that he was somehow a traitor to the United States for coming forward about President Donald Trump's admitted crimes.
‘It takes a small mind to want to out a whistleblower’: Rachel Maddow blasts Trump and GOP
In an analysis of the first day of impeachment, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow explained to late-night comedian Jimmy Fallon why the impeachment hearings were a lot more rational than she anticipated.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) switched committees just to appear and ask questions and Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) humiliated himself, but aside from that, Maddow said she was surprised there were reasonable questions, and everyone remained calm.