Quantcast
Connect with us

‘He can’t fire anybody’: Republican explains why Bannon and Priebus should tell Scaramucci to ‘piss off’

Published

on

The former spokesman for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said Anthony Scaramucci is woefully unqualified for — and should be disqualified from — his job as White House communications director before he officially starts.

Scaramucci called a reporter this week and gave a lengthy and profane interview attacking White House chief strategist Steve Bannon and chief of staff Reince Priebus, who he accused of being a leaker.

ADVERTISEMENT

The financier-turned-White House official later said he mistakenly trusted the reporter, who said Scaramucci never told him the conversation was off the record — and former Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler said the interview was full of inexcusable mistakes.

“A, he does not know what a leak is, B, he does not know what the law is, C, he doesn’t know what levels of attribution are, which is on the record and off the record,” Tyler told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

Scaramucci is selling his stake in SkyBridge Capital, but the transaction isn’t final and he may be ineligible to receive a capital gains tax deferment after he was passed over for an administration position in January.

“He shouldn’t even be in the White House — he has a conflict of interest that hasn’t even been cleared,” Tyler said. “He can’t fire anybody.

Scaramucci described the White House as a sinking ship in another interview, and has threatened to fire numerous officials for leaking to reporters — but Tyler said he shouldn’t have any authority.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If i was in the White House and Scaramucci came to me, I’d tell him to piss off,” Tyler said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

CNN

Watergate’s John Dean thinks Trump wrote part of his legal team’s brief — because it’s so terrible

Published

on

Former White House counsel for Richard Nixon, John Dean, explained that the legal brief out of President Donald Trump's White House was so bad that it had to have been dictated by Trump himself.

Saturday evening, Trump's legal team, chaired by Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow and White House counsel Pat Cipollone, filed their own form of a legal brief that responded to the case filed by Democrats ahead of Tuesday's impeachment trial.

The document called the proceedings “constitutionally invalid” and claims House Democrats are staging a “dangerous attack” with a “brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election.”

Continue Reading

Facebook

WATCH: Prince Harry explains why he and Meghan are leaving the royal family — but promises ‘a life of service’

Published

on

Prince Harry posted a video from an HIV/AIDS fundraiser his mother once supported, where he explained his methodology for leaving his profile role as a royal.

"I will continue to be the same man who holds his country dear," said Harry.

He went on to say that he doesn't intend to walk away and he certainly won't walk away from his causes and interests. "We intend to live a life of service."

In the speech, he thanked those who took him under their wing in the absence of his mother

"I hope you can understand that it's what it had come to," he said for why their family intends to step back.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘You cannot expect anything but fascism’: Pedagogy theorist on how Trump ‘legitimated a culture of lying, cruelty and a collapse of social responsibility’

Published

on

The impeachment of Donald Trump appears to be a crisis without a history, at least a history that illuminates, not just comparisons with other presidential impeachments, but a history that provides historical lessons regarding its relationship to a previous age of tyranny that ushered in horrors associated with a fascist politics in the 1930s.  In the age of Trump, history is now used to divert and elude the most serious questions to be raised about the impeachment crisis. The legacy of earlier presidential impeachments, which include Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, provide a comparative historical context for analysis and criticism. And while Trump’s impeachment is often defined as a more serious constitutional crisis given his attempt to use the power of the presidency to advance his personal political agenda, it is a crisis that willfully ignores the conditions that gave rise to Trump’s presidency along with its recurring pattern of authoritarian behavior, policies, and practices.  One result is that the impeachment process with its abundance of political theater and insipid media coverage treats Trump’s crimes as the endpoint of an abuse of power and an illegal act, rather than as a political action that is symptomatic of a long legacy of conditions that have led to the United States’ slide into the abyss of authoritarianism.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image