Quantcast
Connect with us

MSNBC panel reveals how Trump’s hush money payments to porn stars may help Mueller corroborate infamous dossier

Published

on

Donald Trump’s alleged “hush money” payments to a former adult film star are likely to be viewed by special counsel Robert Mueller as corroborating the blackmail worries raised by the infamous “pee tape” dossier.

“Now we turn to a story that in any other administration would be getting wall-to-wall coverage all night every night. An adult film star basically putting out information about details of a previously undisclosed affair with the current president,” Melber reported. “These reports are about the lengths that Donald Trump allegedly went to silence a woman who says they had a consensual relationship.”

“Stephanie Clifford, she performs under the name Stormy Danielles and had told reporters that she had an 11-month relationship with Donald Trump while he was married,” Melber continued. “She says she was talking to reporters all the way back during the election.”

“All of this matters because it adds some apparent corroboration to that new Wall Street Journal report on an alleged $130,000 this woman received from Donald Trump’s lawyer, also for her silence,” Melber explained.

Melber introduced Jacob Weisberg, who had been investigating the story for Slate since before the election.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If this story broke about any other president, Obama, Bush, you name it, would it be bigger in your view than the way this story feels today?” Melber asked.

“Lord, Ari, this whole presidency is an exercise in defining deviancy down, if this were any other presidency it would be career ending, it would be the biggest news in the world,” Weisberg suggested. “With Donald Trump, it’s sort of not one of the worst ten things this week, that he paid hush-money to cover-up an almost a year-long relationship with a former porn actress.”

“Do you see significance about some of the claims in the Russia story?” Melber asked.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I do,” Weisberg answered. “One, Christopher Steele went to the FBI because he said Trump was vulnerable to blackmail from the Russians. And here is an example, and there couldn’t be a better example of Trump paying hush money, being totally vulnerable to blackmail about something embarrassing.”

“And the other point that people have been very skeptical about some of the things in the dossier about Trump allegedly consorting with prostitutes in Russia and his response to that is, ‘Are you kidding me? I would never do that.’ So the count is getting higher and higher of porn actresses — one claims that he offered her money to have sex with him — so the whole picture starts to be more plausible, the picture that’s painted in the dossier.”

Melber, who had been taking notes, showed the camera that he had written down “conduct, lies, blackmail.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade explained how the hush money could be seen as an attempt to silence a witness.

“I think one point that you touched on is, the whole concept, ‘it’s not the crime, it’s the cover-up.’ It’s not really a crime to be involved in this kind of relationship, it’s certainly embarrassing and certainly something that Donald Trump is not proud for the world to know.”

“Do you think that Bob Mueller looks at all this and it affects how he weighs the evidence whether the compromise or blackmail claims in the dossier could be true?” Melber asked.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think he does, because when you think about relevance, the question is, does this fact make other facts more or less likely to be true. If you see this kind of activity, if it’s true, occurring in this country, why would we think this his behavior in a foreign country might be any different?”

“I do think it’s going to be an important fact for him to be about, but I think the propensity to engage in sexual activity and then to try to lie about it and when you’re doing it in a place like Russia, you’re potentially exposing yourself to blackmail,” McQuade explained.

Watch Part 1:

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch Part 2:


Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t even a competent investor: report

Published

on

There can be no doubt that high-powered hedge fund manager Jeffrey Epstein would rather the public know him for his prominence and success as an investor than for the allegations of child sex trafficking, for which he has now been indicted and faces life in prison. And there has for years been mystique surrounding Epstein's business — his wealth fund is so exclusive that it reportedly requires a billion dollars up front from clients.

But according to the Dow Jones' periodical Barron's, Epstein may not even be good at that.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Jon Stewart blasts ‘abomination’ of Rand Paul trying to ‘balance the budget on the backs of’ 9/11 responders

Published

on

On Wednesday's edition of Fox News' "Special Report," comedian and activist Jon Stewart slammed Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) for blocking unanimous consent for a bill to support health care for 9/11 first responders.

"Pardon me if I'm not impressed in any way by Rand Paul's fiscal responsibility virtue signaling," said Stewart to anchor Bret Baier, who appeared on the show with first responder and activist John Feal.

He added that Paul's complaint, that the bill was unfunded, rings hollow given that he "added hundreds of billions of dollars to our deficit" with the GOP tax cuts for billionaires. He castigated Paul for trying to "balance the budget on the backs of the 9/11 first responder community."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Republicans will never say that racism is ‘racism’ — basically because they’re racist

Published

on

Is there any expression of racism that Republicans will actually admit is racism? It's a question on a lot of progressive minds in the wake of Donald Trump demonizing female congresswomen of color with the "go back" canard that white nationalists and other assorted racists have long used to abuse anyone with heritage they dislike, whether that heritage is Jewish, Irish, Italian, African, Latin American or Muslim. Telling someone to "go back" is, in the ranks of racist statements, right up there with calling a person the N-word or some other rank slur. Yet, there still appears to be resistance among Republicans to admitting that is racism, which leads many on the left to wonder: If this doesn't count, then what could possibly count?

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Enjoy Summer! Try Raw Story Ad-Free for $1. Invest in Progressive Journalism.
close-image