A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld the validity of a 2014 Tennessee ballot measure that removed the right to an abortion from the state constitution.
By a 3-0 vote, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a challenge by eight voters to how the state counted ballots in the election, one of Tennessee’s costliest. The measure, known as Amendment 1, won 53 percent of the vote.
The decision by the Cincinnati-based appeals court overturned a April 2016 lower court ruling ordering a recount; that ruling had been put on hold pending the appeal.
The appeals ruling may encourage the adoption in Tennessee of tighter abortion restrictions, such as a 48-hour waiting period that Republican Governor Bill Haslam signed into law in 2015.
Republicans have big majorities in both houses of Tennessee’s legislature.
Bill Harbison, a lawyer for plaintiffs challenging the vote, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Circuit Judge David McKeague said opponents of Amendment 1 failed to show how their due process and equal protection rights were harmed by Tennessee’s vote-counting practice, or that their votes were diluted relative to the votes of abortion opponents.
“This is not the ‘exceptional case’ that warrants federal intervention in a lawful state election process,” McKeague wrote.
“Although the subject of abortion rights will continue to be controversial in Tennessee and across our nation, it is time for uncertainty surrounding the people’s 2014 approval and ratification of Amendment 1 to be put to rest,” he added.
The office of Tennessee Republican Attorney General Herbert Slatery, which defended the vote count, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
McKeague was appointed to the appeals court by President George W. Bush. The other panel members, Richard Suhrheinrich and Ronald Gilman, were appointed by Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, respectively.
Amendment 1 said, “Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of an abortion,” and said that authorized elected officials may “enact, amend, or repeal statutes regarding abortion.”
In ordering a recount, then-Chief Judge Kevin Sharp of the federal court in Nashville called Tennessee’s vote-counting practice “fundamentally unfair.” He also said it did not comply with a state constitutional provision that it take into account the number of votes cast for governor.
The case is George et al v Hargett et al, 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 16-5563.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Leslie Adler)
‘Cruelty is the point’: Trump takes aim at Medicaid with plan that could harm millions
"The president's war on healthcare knows no bounds."
The Trump administration is reportedly planning to intensify its assault on Medicaid by granting certain states permission to convert federal funding for the program into block grants, a move critics slammed as a cruel and likely illegal attack on vulnerable people.
Politico reported Thursday that the plan, which could be finalized as early as next week, would allow the 37 states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act to seek waivers to convert funding into fixed sums that could limit states' flexibility to increase spending in response to public need.
WATCH LIVE: Senate reconvenes impeachment trial of Donald Trump as president’s lawyers make their case
Republicans fear 2020 election wipeout if more Ukraine bombshells drop after they clear Trump of impeachment: report
Thus far, nothing indicates that Senate Republicans have been persuaded to vote against President Donald Trump in the impeachment trial. If any Republicans vote to remove the president, it almost certainly will not be the required 20. Indeed, many of them appear to be looking for excuses to be offended by the Democrats' presentation.
But according to Politico, that doesn't mean Trump and his GOP allies believe they have won just yet.