New US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo took aim at Germany over its defence spending Friday, using his first NATO meeting to push President Donald Trump’s call for allies to shoulder a bigger burden.
As a meeting of alliance foreign ministers put on a united front on the need to counter Russian “aggression”, Pompeo hammered home one of Trump’s oldest themes — demanding that NATO members pay their way.
Some allies, including Europe’s economic powerhouse Germany, have been reluctant to meet a commitment made at a NATO summit in Wales in September 2014 to spend two percent of GDP on defence by 2024.
Trump has repeatedly declared this to be tantamount to countries not paying their dues, and former CIA boss Pompeo carried a tough message to NATO headquarters in Brussels.
Asked if Germany was doing enough to meet the target, Pompeo said bluntly: “No. They should meet the goals that they agreed to.”
“European nations must bear the necessary responsibilities for their security and make the case to their fellow citizens why it is critical to fulfil their obligations on defence spending,” Pompeo told reporters after the meeting.
Pompeo’s comments came as German Chancellor Angela Merkel was heading to the White House for talks with Trump.
– ‘Fulfilling our obligations’ –
His stark language contrasted with what Luxembourg’s veteran Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn said was a more diplomatic approach in the meeting itself.
“Mike Pompeo of course insisted on the need for burden-sharing, but he did it without aggression,” Asselborn told AFP.
“On the contrary he was attentive, he listened and took part in all the discussions.”
As he arrived for the talks Germany’s new Foreign Minister Heiko Maas stressed the contribution Berlin was making to humanitarian work in Syria and to Iraq.
He said Merkel’s coalition government was in the middle of budget negotiations, but held out little prospect that they would lead to a defence spending boost.
And he stressed Germany “has an extraordinary presence in terms of its perception of its international responsibility and that we are also fulfilling our obligations to NATO.”
Away from the harsh words on funding there was agreement among foreign ministers on the need to find ways to counter Russia’s adoption of “hybrid warfare” techniques — subversion, propaganda, cyber warfare — to undermine the West without triggering a full NATO military response.
Pompeo sought to ease lingering concerns about Trump’s commitment to NATO, saying the alliance was “more indispensible than ever” due to Russia’s “unacceptable” actions, from Georgia to Ukraine to political meddling.
Noting that the talks were the first NATO ministerial meeting since Russian agents allegedly used a nerve agent to poison a former double agent in the English town of Salisbury, Britain’s Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson summarised the dilemma.
“How do you deal with a military environment in which attacks come below the threshold of the Article 5 commitment to mutual support but do demand a common response?” he asked, referring to the alliance’s mutual self-defence pact.
– ‘Russian aggression’ –
Ministers discussed concrete proposals to address the problem, a senior State Department official told reporters, but they are not expected to be finalised and announced before NATO’s full summit on July 11 and 12.
“There was consensus on Russian aggression, the scale of Russian aggression and this being a problem that requires a response,” the official said.
Tensions between NATO and Russia are running at levels not seen since the Cold War, but NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg insisted the alliance was still open to dialogue with Moscow.
“We agreed that our dual-track policy of strong deterrence and defence combined with meaningful dialogue is the right one,” Stoltenberg said.
“When tensions are high, our dialogue is more important than ever,” he added, saying the alliance was working for another meeting of the NATO-Russia Council.
Ministers also debated plans to expand NATO’s training mission in Iraq. Details will be confirmed at the summit in July, but Stoltenberg said it would involve several hundred personnel.
After his time in Brussels, Pompeo will head to the Middle East, with stops in Israel, Jordan and Saudi Arabia — countries chosen to reflect what his spokeswoman called “importance as key allies and partners in the region.
I was an impeachment skeptic. Here’s why I’m now convinced Trump must be removed
Despite all the uncertainty surrounding impeachment, we can capture the current moment succinctly: President Trump’s fate hinges on whether Republican senators are more fearful of losing in a primary or in the general election. Now that the live impeachment hearings are about to fuel nationwide prime-time programming, those senators’ fears are likely to intensify.
While that dynamic will determine whether Trump will be removed from office, it doesn’t tell us whether he should be. I am generally an impeachment skeptic. My recent book—Impeaching the President: Past, Present, Future—argues that impeachment should be regarded as a last resort that, as a general proposition, is inappropriate in a president’s first term. The American people are capable of rendering judgment and should be given the first crack.
Nicolle Wallace tells Colbert why she cursed at Fox News host Laura Ingraham — and that she left the GOP
MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace appeared on Stephen Colbert's "Late Show" Wednesday after spending hours analyzing the impeachment hearings that began that morning.
One of the first things Colbert asked about was the recent smackdown from Wallace about Fox News host Laura Ingraham and her guests going after Col. Alexander Vindman. Ingraham proposed that because Vindman was born in Ukraine that he was somehow a traitor to the United States for coming forward about President Donald Trump's admitted crimes.
‘It takes a small mind to want to out a whistleblower’: Rachel Maddow blasts Trump and GOP
In an analysis of the first day of impeachment, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow explained to late-night comedian Jimmy Fallon why the impeachment hearings were a lot more rational than she anticipated.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) switched committees just to appear and ask questions and Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) humiliated himself, but aside from that, Maddow said she was surprised there were reasonable questions, and everyone remained calm.