WASHINGTON -- Before they can face each other in the general election, both U.S. ... against Menendez, D-N.J., who is seeking a third six-year term. McCormick announced a campaign for the 2017 Democratic nomination for governor but did not run. Hugin, meanwhile, drew intraparty opposition ...
The Republican Party is "leaning into fascism" as GOP candidates across the country try to position themselves as the "purest" and "most extreme" supporters of their "dear leader" — former President Donald Trump — according to Daily Beast columnist Eleanor Clift.
Pointing to gubernatorial races in places like Idaho, Texas, Alabama and Virginia, Clift writes that the 2022 GOP primaries are "shaping up like the Hunger Games, dystopian battles among the Trumpian faithful."
Matt Bennett, a co-founder of Third Way, a moderate Democratic group, described the primaries as "incredible races to the bottom as they one up each other to be the craziest and the Trumpiest in whatever context presents itself."
While some may dismiss the trend as mere "politics," Clift notes that Trump and his followers are putting in place "policies that could allow Republican legislatures to overturn elections when they don't like the results."
She points to a recent Washington Post essay by Robert Kagan, a neo-conservative foreign policy scholar, who argued that "we have never seen a U.S. political movement tied so passionately to one man and his lies as it is to Trump."
"What we're seeing on the populist right is rhetoric that leans into fascism and fuels primary challenges to see who can be the purest, the harshest, and the most extreme voice on the Trumpian right to win the Dear Leader's endorsement," Clift wrote.
Bennett argued that prior to the 2022 elections, one could argue that Republicans were merely trying to keep Democrats from voting, which is "odious" but "within bounds."
"Since the election, it's become super-clear that if they don't like the outcome, they'll change it," Bennett said. "When we're talking about abrogating or nullifying people's votes, that is the end of the American experiment. Our democracy, at least for now, will be over."
MSNBC's Morning Joe rips GOP as 'raging hypocrites' over deficit fight: 'This is Trump's debt, this is McConnell's debt'
MSNBC's Joe Scarborough called out Republicans as "raging hypocrites" for threatening to default on the national debt after racking up deficit spending under former president Donald Trump.
Senate Republicans risked default by blocking a bill Monday that would fund the government and suspend the debt ceiling into late next year, but the "Morning Joe" host blamed them for much of the debt they don't want to pay off.
"We certainly know republicans are raging hypocrites in the era of Trump, [and] we are still in the era of Trump," Scarborough said. "Here is a party that spent like drunken socialists -- you talk about socialists, this Republican Party sent like drunken socialists over the past five years. They racked up record levels deficits and record levels of debt. The bills that Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell approved, the largest budget in the history of the republic. The Republicans' budget were the largest in history of republic and ran up record deficits and debt. That's the bill, actually, that has come due now. We are not talking about what happens in the future, we don't know what's going to happen in the future. You don't default at your bank for debts. You may accrue in the future, [but] you default because of what you already done."
"This is Trump's debt, this is McConnell's debt, this is Republicans' debt," he added.
Scarborough said the numbers are clear.
"Republicans spent more money on budgets over four Trump's years than any president before -- LBJ, FDR, you name it, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton," he said. "You pick the Democrat and the person that was lied about and being called socialists, Republicans spend more money."
09 28 2021 06 10 30 www.youtube.com
Texas reduces Black and Hispanic majority congressional districts in proposed map, despite people of color fueling population growth
Texas lawmakers on Monday released their first draft of a new congressional map that would largely protect incumbents while reducing the number of districts in which Black and Hispanic residents make up the majority of eligible voters. The map reduces the number of districts dominated by people of color even though Texas gained two additional congressional seats and the population of Asian, Black and Hispanic Texans outpaced white Texans over the last decade.
Republicans constructed the map with incumbent protection in mind — a strategy that focused on bolstering vulnerable GOP seats rather than aggressively adding new seats that could flip from blue to red. However, the map does in fact strengthen Republican positioning overall in Texas, going from 22 to 25 districts that would have voted for Donald Trump in 2020. The number of congressional districts that voted for Joe Biden would have shrunk by one, from 14 to 13.
While many incumbents appear safe in these maps, others were drawn into districts that overlap with one another — for example, the proposed map pits Houston Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw against Democrat Rep. Sylvia Garcia. It also pits two Houston Democrats — Reps. Al Green and Sheila Jackson Lee — against each other.
Democrats, who have been out of power for decades, have attempted to make state elections more competitive but the redrawing of congressional maps gives the GOP an opportunity to lock in their advantage for another decade.
Texas' current 36-seat congressional delegation is made up of 23 Republicans and 13 Democrats. Under the new map, Texas will have 38 congressional seats and 40 electoral votes in future presidential contests. The two new seats were drawn in Austin and Houston.
The redrawing of district maps is intended to reflect population growth captured by the latest census. People of color accounted for 95% of the state's growth over the last decade, but in the new map there's one less Hispanic majority district and zero districts with a Black majority. The latest census results show Hispanic Texans nearly match the number of white Texans.
Based on eligible voters, the current congressional district map includes 22 districts with white majorities, eight with Hispanic majorities, one with a Black majority and five that have no majority. The newly proposed map includes 23 districts with white majorities, seven with Hispanic majorities, none with a Black majority and eight that have no majority.
Domingo Garcia, national president of the League of United Latin American Citizens was dismayed that Hispanics, who drove much of the state's population increase over the decade, growing by nearly 2 million people, would have less opportunity to elect the candidates of their choice under the proposed map.
"This map is clearly gerrymandered by politicians to protect incumbents and totally discriminate against Hispanic voters," he said. "LULAC has filed suit against the state of Texas every 10 years since 1970 and we've prevailed every 10 years. Unless there's new maps drawn, we expect we will wind up in federal court again."
Gary Bledsoe, president of the Texas NAACP, called the proposal shocking, hurtful and outrageous.
"The proposed map vastly diminishes the voting strength of minorities all around the state by either packing them into districts already electing minority candidates of choice or cracking them by pushing them into districts dominated by conservative white voters," he said. "As the state has garnered two new congressional seats on the backs of its minority population, it has sought to put forth a proposed congressional map that is clearly retrogressive."
The maps were proposed by state Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Houston, who leads the chamber's redistricting committee. This is only the first draft of the map, which is likely to change before it's passed by the Texas Legislature and signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott.
Less competitive districts
If approved, the proposed map would narrow the battlefield of competitive races for both Democrats and Republicans.
Based on 2020 presidential election results, there would have been only one district in the state — the 15th Congressional District in South Texas — with a margin between Biden and Trump voters of less than five points.
As a result, nearly all endangered incumbents on both sides of the aisle likely will have easier paths to reelection.
Texas members of the House GOP delegation were closely involved in the drawing process and approved the map last week, according to two sources close to the Texas delegation.
The most obvious exception to that is U.S. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez, who had a surprisingly close finish in 2020. His district, once a safe Democratic seat, now tilts in Republicans' favor. But instead of a full-blown South Texas GOP offensive targeting two other neighboring Democratic districts, mapmakers bolstered Democratic voters in seats held by U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar of Laredo and U.S. Rep. Filemon Vela of Brownsville — especially the seat of Vela, who is retiring — at the expense of Gonzalez. His 15th Congressional District flipped from a seat Biden carried to one where Trump would have narrowly won.
But the map was a relief to most other incumbents.
Democratic U.S. Rep. Colin Allred of Dallas surprised Republicans in 2018 when he was able to dislodge the once-safe Republican 32nd Congressional District. Instead of targeting him this time around, Republicans sought to bolster nearby Republicans by packing his district with Democrats and all but assuring a Democrat will hold his seat for years to come.
To his west, Republican U.S. Rep. Beth Van Duyne's seat flipped from a district Biden carried by nearly 6 points in 2020 to what would have been a solid 12-point Trump district. In 2020, Democrats heavily targeted Van Duyne and several other Republican seats.
Garcia, of LULAC, said those safe districts come at the expense of Hispanic voters in Dallas and Tarrant counties. Hispanics, who make up the largest portion of Dallas' population and are the largest minority group in Tarrant, did not get a majority-Hispanic district in the region. Instead, their population was split between the 32nd Congressional District represented by Allred, the 30th Congressional District represented by U.S. Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson and the 33rd Congressional District represented by Marc Veasey — solidly Democratic districts.
"That protects the Anglo incumbents like Van Duyne and Kay Granger whose districts were trending Democrat and have been fighting off Latino and Latina challengers," he said.
The new map also packed more Trump voters into the 23rd Congressional District, currently held by Republican U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, who served in many cycles over the last 18 years as the only competitive U.S. House seat. The new version of that district would have seen Trump win by a seven-point margin, a sharp shift from a seat Hillary Clinton carried in 2016.
U.S. Rep. Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, a Houston Democrat, is likely to run in a revamped version of her 7th Congressional District. Like Allred, her 2018 victory was a surprise to Republicans. But instead of targeting her, they spread some of the Republican vote in her region to Republican incumbents.
Elsewhere in Houston, U.S. Rep. Kevin Brady's retirement allowed Republicans to split up his Montgomery County-based 8th Congressional District in order to strengthen nearby Republican districts held by U.S. Reps. Michael McCaul of Austin, Crenshaw of Houston and the newly created 38th Congressional District.
The state picked up two seats in reapportionment and on the surface they appear to split between the two parties.
The new 37th Congressional District will consolidate central and west Austin, somewhat resembling a district longtime Democratic U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett held until Republicans dismantled it in 2003. It was not immediately clear whether he would run in that district or continue to serve in the 35th Congressional District, which stretches down to Bexar County. Back then, Republicans aimed to dilute the liberal Austin vote, split up into several congressional districts, several of which had otherwise rural populations. But as this decade wore on, the Austin liberal vote was so potent that otherwise safe Republicans had to fight hard for reelection.
Doggett condemned the proposal in a statement, adding that it's too soon to make a personal decision about running over a draft of the map that is likely to change.
"Fearing voters, Republicans once again engage in extreme gerrymandering to carve up neighborhoods and communities of interest in Travis, Hays and Bexar Counties—aiming to dilute strong voices. With lines shaped like snakes, tentacles, and dragons, parts of both Travis and Bexar are included in five different districts. San Antonio and Austin are connected by a sliver only slightly wider than I-35," he said.
The other new seat — the 38th Congressional District in west and northern Harris County — will likely be safe Republican territory.
This will be the first round of political mapmaking in Texas since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down provisions to protect voters of color from discrimination. Previously, states with long histories of voting discrimination, like Texas, had to receive approval from the federal government before making any changes to election laws or political maps.
But the Supreme Court essentially did away with that requirement in 2013, leaving no buffer for voters of color if lawmakers pass discriminatory maps.
Since the enactment of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, Texas has not made it through a single decade without a federal court admonishing it for violating federal protections for voters of color.
Patrick Svitek contributed to this report.
Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Raw Story Investigates and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.
$95 / year — Just $7.91/month
I want to Support More
$14.99 per month