Connect with us

Conservative news outlets refuse to report about underage girls who received lewd messages from pro-Trump media figure



Michael Moates with Sean Hannity
Michael Moates with Sean Hannity (Photo: Facebook)

A right-wing media figure allegedly knew he was sending lewd messages to underage girls — but conservative news outlets refused to run the story when the girls came forward.

Right Wing Watch reported that Michael Moates, the 23-year-old who identifies himself as the chairman of the DC Chronicle nonprofit news blog, flirted with and made “inappropriate” sexual comments towards a number of teen girls on Twitter.


Sixteen-year-old Purity Thomas, the leader of a pro-life youth group, came forward on August 23 by posting a statement claiming Moates is “disgusting” and that he knew her age while “flirting” with her.


Within 10 minutes of Thomas’ statement, the DC Chronicle co-founder made his own statement — albeit vague.

“The fact that you can’t call a woman beautiful without offending them anymore is a problem,” he wrote in the now-protected tweet.


After exchanging stories about their experiences at right-wing protests, Thomas claimed that Moates began flirting with her, calling her “purdy” (a take on Southern slang for “pretty” and her name, Purity) and “crazy beautiful.” The comments made her feel uncomfortable and she decided she wouldn’t let the blogger near “her team” of teen anti-abortion activists.

In September, Moates defended himself to Carl Higbie, the former Trump appointee who was ousted after his racist comments on his radio show were revealed.

“Yes, she was beautiful,” he told Higbie, adding that Thomas never told him it “bothered her” and that she “made it sexual” with her interpretation.


“Moates repeatedly asserted during the podcast that he did not sexually harass Thomas, although Thomas has not accused him of doing so,” RWW noted. “During the interview, Moates did not mention that Thomas was 16 years old when he made his comments to her.”

After the teen came forward, she said she began receiving messages from other young women with similar experiences.


Seventeen-year-old Hadassah Cohen was new to Twitter when Moates began following her and gave her a shout-out on his own feed, causing her to gain followers. She messaged him to thank him for the boost, but “the conversation quickly entered inappropriate territory.”

Cohen alleged that she was drafted as an unpaid writer for a new pro-Trump news site Moates had started and was even once told she was the site’s editor-in-chief, although the blogger later referred to her as an “intern.”

The girl said Moates once told her she “couldn’t possibly be telling the truth that I was a proud virgin, that I had indeed never kissed a boy, because I was too gorgeous for that” when she was 16.


“I didn’t know what to say,” Cohen told RWW. “I think I was kind of dumbfounded.”

She followed up her claim with screenshots of some of the direct messages where Moates was “inappropriate sexually” with her.




“It doesn’t take rocket science to figure out he wanted me to ask him questions of sexual nature,” Cohen said. “He continued to harp on me about how I didn’t have a boyfriend, how I hadn’t kissed anyone, and that it was my fault that I didn’t have a boyfriend.”

The report noted that during his interview with Higbie, Moates accused Cohen of trying to “smear” him by taking his messages out of context. He then cited the First Amendment and said the girl continued to write for his website after he made the comments.

After Cohen came forward, The Daily Beast’s Lachlan Markay tweeted that Moates was intent on filing a libel lawsuit against the girls who claimed he sexually harassed them.

“He was also adamant that unsolicited comments about how beautiful a woman is are definitely not sexual harassment,” Markay noted.



Thomas told RWW that she and the group of young women affected by Moates reached out to “several” conservative news outlets but were turned away because of the blogger’s lawsuit threat.

“We decided we should take it to conservative media,” she said. “I mean, this is a conservative guy being inappropriate to conservative girls, so we have the conservatives handle this. This is their job, right? You would think. They need to man up and own one of their people.”

Read the entire report via Right Wing Watch.

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
Continue Reading

2020 Election

That was no debate — it was a brawl



Do we really have to pick a debate winner in a brawl? Do the rules matter?

Didn’t we know ahead of time that Donald Trump would slash viciously and personally and pretend that he is an outsider to Washington and that Joe Biden would try to look presidential,  mostly stick to his message while wryly noting that Trump was lying once again? If there was a substantive question or response that was a surprise, it slipped by me.

It may have been important to election prospects, but as a debate, it was a pretty sad commentary on our times. And yes, the fact-checking industry was hard at work (yes, Mr. President, there are 100 million Americans with health pre-conditions.)

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Here are 5 stunning moments from Biden and Trump’s first debate



President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden faced off for the first time Tuesday night in the inaugural presidential debate of the 2020 general election.

It was a catastrophe. Trump was belligerent, mendacious, and overbearing, refusing to let Biden answer questions most of the time without interruption. Biden managed to get in several good moments, but he was often bulled over by the president's bluster and was unable to make a complete argument.

But Trump didn't really seem to get the better of Biden. By being so aggressive, he came off desperate, dishonest, and out of control. It was not a good look for a sitting president. And it completely undermined the supposed point of the debate: informing voters about the issues. Instead, it showcased the candidates' respective personalities, at least to some degree. While unpleasant, it may have been informative in its own way.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump blasted for ‘avalanche of lying’ in brutal takedown by CNN fact-checker



CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale provided a brutal dose of reality after President Donald Trump constantly mislead Americans with his false claims during the first 2020 general election presidential debate.

CNN's Wolf Blitzer introduced Dale by recapping that, in his opinion, "clearly this debate was an embarrassment for the United States of America -- a clear embarrassment."

"How much was fact?" Blitzer asked. "How much was false?"

"Well, it depended Wolf on who we were listening to," Dale replied.

"I think it's important for us as journalists to say when both sides are not alike -- and they were not alike tonight," he explained.

Continue Reading
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE