JPMorgan Chase & Co’s trading desk was not buying what U.S. President Donald Trump was selling this week.
On Tuesday, major stock indexes plummeted more than 3 percent on renewed fears of a trade war with China — just days after Trump tweeted, following a steak dinner with Chinese President Xi Jinping, that “Relations with China have taken a BIG leap forward!”
“It doesn’t seem like anything was actually agreed to at the dinner,” JPMorgan wrote in a note to clients later that day, adding that Trump’s tweets “seem if not completely fabricated then grossly exaggerated.”
The mistrust from the bank’s trading desk highlights a broader dilemma for Wall Street investors: how seriously to take comments from the White House.
On one hand, traders have long known that President Trump’s bold pronouncements do not always hold, ultimately muting their effect on securities. On the other hand, market volatility has picked up in 2018, in part because of confusion over comments by Washington officials, making them harder to ignore.
“It’s a judgment call about which announcements should be taken seriously,” said Maria Vassalou, portfolio manager for Perella Weinberg Partners’ $685 million global macro strategy.
“This situation certainly creates unnecessary volatility and complications to the investment process.”
Trump says relations with China took ‘BIG leap forward’
Trump says he is ‘a Tariff Man’
It is not just Trump. Unexpected comments from White House officials such as Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and economic adviser Larry Kudlow have caused a stir with traders. Each man was cited by Reuters as a driver of market moves more than two dozen times.
Mnuchin sent the U.S. dollar to a three-year low in late January after comments at the World Economic Forum in Davos suggesting that a weaker currency was “good for us.” Within hours, Trump appeared to contradict him, saying he ultimately wanted a strong dollar, lifting the greenback.
As for Kudlow, on April 4 he told reporters that it was possible the U.S. tariffs on Chinese industrial products might never go into effect and may be simply a negotiating tactic. Stocks rose after the remarks, which an unnamed White House official later told Reuters were meant to reassure markets.
Yet equity futures fell the next day after Trump said in a statement that he had instructed U.S. trade officials to consider tariffs on an additional $100 billion worth of imports from China to punish them for retaliating against earlier announced tariffs.
Some investors have taken protection from White House-fueled volatility into their own hands.
Juan Gomez, head of hedge fund firm Black Swan Quantitative Advisors which manages $75 million in assets, said he has adjusted his options-focused models over the last two years to incorporate more protection against market volatility, partially in response to Trump administration comments.
“At this point you are expecting controversial headlines,” Gomez said. “At the beginning, it drove me crazy, but now it’s just part of what to expect.”
Katina Stefanova, head of Marto Capital LP which manages approximately $300 million, said her hedge fund firm had created a “Trumponomics” index of securities to help hedge the broader portfolio.
Stefanova said her fund’s profit this year – up about 7 percent in 2018 through November – would be around two percentage points lower without the index, which has recently focused on impacts of U.S. trade wars, such as Chinese technology stocks, U.S. industrial companies and Asian currencies.
“You still have to take the White House very seriously,” Stefanova said. “Inconsistency itself swings markets and affects sentiment.”
Other investors simply try to look past White House headlines.
Daniel Lowen, chairman of Quantedge Capital USA Inc, said his approximately $1.5 billion hedge fund firm’s algorithms do not try to anticipate market movements from Trump administration pronouncements. “We make no attempt to interpret what we read in the news as input to our investment decisions,” Lowen said.
The head of equities at a multi-billion-dollar hedge fund manager, who requested anonymity in order to speak with the media, said Trump’s comments are “impossible to ignore” but the firm avoids reactive trading even if it can hurt in the short term. “We try and actually isolate our returns from market risk,” the person said.
Whatever the reaction, professional investors said the White House’s effect on markets is hard to avoid. Securities are virtually certain to continue moving on statements related to U.S. trade policy, interest rate changes and other economic issues. The CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX .VIX, a common measure of perceived fear in the markets, is up nearly 90 percent this year.
“Maybe some people are good at parsing their words and figuring out what’s what, but that’s very difficult,” said Fritz Folts, chief investment strategist, 3EDGE Asset Management LP, which oversees approximately $800 million. “You have to look at what they do and not what they say.”
Reporting by Lawrence Delevingne and Trevor Hunnicutt; Additional reporting by Lewis Krauskopf and Dan Burns in New York; Editing by Neal Templin and Lisa Shumaker
Adam Schiff buries one of the GOP’s remaining anti-impeachment talking points
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) on Wednesday took a hammer to one of the Republican Party's few remaining talking points aimed at undermining the House impeachment inquiry.
Throughout the testimony of European Union ambassador Gordon Sondland, Republicans kept saying that there couldn't be any kind of extortion scheme on President Donald Trump's part because Ukraine got its military aid without publicly announcing investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden.
Schiff, however, showed why this argument simply doesn't hold up.
"My colleagues seem to be under the impression that unless the president spoke the words, 'Ambassador Sondland, I am bribing the Ukrainian president,' that there's no evidence of bribery!" he said.
Chris Wallace fact-checks his own Fox News colleagues after their denials of Trump’s quid pro quo
As US Ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland gave his testimony in the House impeachment hearings this Wednesday, Fox News contributor Ken Starr acknowledged that Sondland's testimony all but guarantees that articles of impeachment will be drawn up against President Trump. He also posited that Trump "gave himself enough cover" regarding Sondland's September 9 conversation with Trump where he said the President allegedly said, "I want nothing, I want nothing, I want no quid pro quo."
"Well, I think that Ken Starr and [Fox News contributor] Andy McCarthy are very good lawyers," Wallace said. "And like any good lawyers they can parse this, phrase this any way they want, but as a reporter it seems to me that we have to go to what the headline is today, and the headline is that Gordon Sondland, one of the three amigos, perhaps the one who had the most direct contact with Donald Trump, says in his opening statement, 'Was there a quid pro quo with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting? The answer is yes.'"
Conservative attorney dismantles GOP arguments against impeachment: ‘Trump’s abuse threatens your freedom’
A conservative attorney knocked down Republican arguments against impeachment one by one in a viral tweet, and urged others to support the removal President Donald Trump.
Bryan Gividen, an appellate attorney from Dallas, touted his conservative bona fides by describing himself as a "pro-religious liberty, pro-life, would snort Cocaine Mitch’s judicial confirmations" if he could -- but still said he supports Trump's impeachment.
"At this point, there is no question that President Trump directed U.S. officials to withhold security funding to the Ukraine so Ukraine would investigate the Bidens," Gividen began. "That is the kind of abuse of the President’s authority we should not tolerate."