Quantcast
Connect with us

Trading Trump: Wall Street stresses over White House comments

Published

on

JPMorgan Chase & Co’s trading desk was not buying what U.S. President Donald Trump was selling this week.

On Tuesday, major stock indexes plummeted more than 3 percent on renewed fears of a trade war with China — just days after Trump tweeted, following a steak dinner with Chinese President Xi Jinping, that “Relations with China have taken a BIG leap forward!”

ADVERTISEMENT

“It doesn’t seem like anything was actually agreed to at the dinner,” JPMorgan wrote in a note to clients later that day, adding that Trump’s tweets “seem if not completely fabricated then grossly exaggerated.”

The mistrust from the bank’s trading desk highlights a broader dilemma for Wall Street investors: how seriously to take comments from the White House.

On one hand, traders have long known that President Trump’s bold pronouncements do not always hold, ultimately muting their effect on securities. On the other hand, market volatility has picked up in 2018, in part because of confusion over comments by Washington officials, making them harder to ignore.

“It’s a judgment call about which announcements should be taken seriously,” said Maria Vassalou, portfolio manager for Perella Weinberg Partners’ $685 million global macro strategy.

“This situation certainly creates unnecessary volatility and complications to the investment process.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump says relations with China took ‘BIG leap forward’ 

Trump says he is ‘a Tariff Man’

It is not just Trump. Unexpected comments from White House officials such as Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and economic adviser Larry Kudlow have caused a stir with traders. Each man was cited by Reuters as a driver of market moves more than two dozen times.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mnuchin sent the U.S. dollar to a three-year low in late January after comments at the World Economic Forum in Davos suggesting that a weaker currency was “good for us.” Within hours, Trump appeared to contradict him, saying he ultimately wanted a strong dollar, lifting the greenback. 

As for Kudlow, on April 4 he told reporters that it was possible the U.S. tariffs on Chinese industrial products might never go into effect and may be simply a negotiating tactic. Stocks rose after the remarks, which an unnamed White House official later told Reuters were meant to reassure markets.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet equity futures fell the next day after Trump said in a statement that he had instructed U.S. trade officials to consider tariffs on an additional $100 billion worth of imports from China to punish them for retaliating against earlier announced tariffs.

HEDGING TRUMP
Some investors have taken protection from White House-fueled volatility into their own hands.

Juan Gomez, head of hedge fund firm Black Swan Quantitative Advisors which manages $75 million in assets, said he has adjusted his options-focused models over the last two years to incorporate more protection against market volatility, partially in response to Trump administration comments.

ADVERTISEMENT

“At this point you are expecting controversial headlines,” Gomez said. “At the beginning, it drove me crazy, but now it’s just part of what to expect.”

Katina Stefanova, head of Marto Capital LP which manages approximately $300 million, said her hedge fund firm had created a “Trumponomics” index of securities to help hedge the broader portfolio.

Stefanova said her fund’s profit this year – up about 7 percent in 2018 through November – would be around two percentage points lower without the index, which has recently focused on impacts of U.S. trade wars, such as Chinese technology stocks, U.S. industrial companies and Asian currencies.

“You still have to take the White House very seriously,” Stefanova said. “Inconsistency itself swings markets and affects sentiment.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Other investors simply try to look past White House headlines.

Daniel Lowen, chairman of Quantedge Capital USA Inc, said his approximately $1.5 billion hedge fund firm’s algorithms do not try to anticipate market movements from Trump administration pronouncements. “We make no attempt to interpret what we read in the news as input to our investment decisions,” Lowen said.

The head of equities at a multi-billion-dollar hedge fund manager, who requested anonymity in order to speak with the media, said Trump’s comments are “impossible to ignore” but the firm avoids reactive trading even if it can hurt in the short term. “We try and actually isolate our returns from market risk,” the person said.

Whatever the reaction, professional investors said the White House’s effect on markets is hard to avoid. Securities are virtually certain to continue moving on statements related to U.S. trade policy, interest rate changes and other economic issues. The CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX .VIX, a common measure of perceived fear in the markets, is up nearly 90 percent this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Maybe some people are good at parsing their words and figuring out what’s what, but that’s very difficult,” said Fritz Folts, chief investment strategist, 3EDGE Asset Management LP, which oversees approximately $800 million. “You have to look at what they do and not what they say.”

Reporting by Lawrence Delevingne and Trevor Hunnicutt; Additional reporting by Lewis Krauskopf and Dan Burns in New York; Editing by Neal Templin and Lisa Shumaker


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Democrats win another voting rights victory as absentee restrictions struck down in South Carolina

Published

on

On Monday, voting rights attorney Marc Elias reported that a federal court has blocked a restriction on absentee ballots for the upcoming South Carolina primary.

The ruling undoes a requirement that mail-in ballots be accompanied by a witness.

BREAKING: @DCCC, @TheDemocrats, and @scdp score major voting rights victory in South Carolina. Federal Court blocks witness requirement for absentee ballots in June primary.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

GOP ripped for refusing to remove Trump from office: ‘Folly of that failure becomes clearer by the day’

Published

on

Republicans seeking to keep control of the United States Senate were harshly criticized by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch for failing to remove President Donald Trump from office during impeachment.

"For four years now, as both a candidate and president, Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked America’s voting system, falsely claiming voter fraud any time it suited his needs. In a new low, last week he threatened the federal funding of two states over their reasonable moves to facilitate mail-in voting," the newspaper noted in an editorial published online on Memorial Day. "What does it say that the head of the world’s leading democracy is so intent on undermining that democracy?"

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Fox News commentator slammed for mocking Joe Biden’s decision to wear a mask

Published

on

On Monday, during his observance of Memorial Day, former Vice President Joe Biden donned a face mask in accordance with CDC guidelines — a contrast with President Donald Trump, who has frequently refused to wear a mask even in some places that require them.

But Fox News senior analyst Brit Hume went out of his way to mock how Biden looked wearing it.

This might help explain why Trump doesn’t like to wear a mask in public. Biden today. pic.twitter.com/9l1gw1ljBE

— Brit Hume (@brithume) May 25, 2020

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image