Hundreds of people descended on the headquarters of the New York Times on Saturday to demand the “paper of record” drastically improve its coverage of the global climate crisis and specifically demanded its reporters refer to the situation as a “climate emergency” in alignment with what the world’s scientific community is warning.
Coordinated by Extinction Rebellion NYC, 70 people were reported arrested after the group staged a sit-in on Eight Avenue in midtown Manhattan in order to bring attention to the failure of the paper—and that of the journalism industry overall—to adequately report on the global urgency of skyrocketing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, rapidly warming oceans, and all the associated perils that result. The group hung banners in front of the Times building as well as from the Port Authority Bus Terminal on the other side of the street.
Standing on the street corner, scores of people repeated the chant: “Report the urgency, this is a climate emergency!’
— Ray (@brother_peaches) June 23, 2019
Others, as shown in this footage captured by News2Share, shouted “Tell the truth! Tell the truth!” as they sat down in the street and refused to leave:
Detailing their demands, the group has put forth a “Climate Media Standards” document which offers guidance to outlets, editors, and reporters for how to best provide coverage. For example, the standards call for use of “climate emergency language” in all reporting:
- Stop calling it “climate change.” Name the threat: “climate crisis,” “climate breakdown,” “climate destruction,” or “climate emergency.”
- Use language that states the risks of the crisis more clearly. For example, “global warming” becomes “global heating,” and “biodiversity” becomes “wildlife.”
- Do not publish statements that cast doubt on the scientific consensus that a catastrophic climate crisis is under way and driven by human activity.
- Do not print the opinion of writers who cast doubt on the scientific consensus and the effects of the climate emergency.
Ironically, however, it appeared the Times did not read the memo because their own coverage of Saturday’s protest—which was actually just an Associated Press wire version of the events—did not take the advice.
Demonstrator Donna Nicolino told the Guardian she was willing to risk arrest because “we want the New York Times as well as all the other media to treat climate change as the crisis it is.”
As one demonstrators was brought down from the side of a building in handcuffs by police, she shouted to the crowd: “This is the biggest crisis in human history. What are we going to tell our children when they ask us: why didn’t we do anything to stop it while we still had time?”
“This is the biggest crisis in human history. What are we going to tell our children when they ask us: why didn’t we do anything to stop it while we still had time?”@XR_NYC @nytimes video credit: @Commandarama pic.twitter.com/SaVROJoFGJ
— Extinction Rebellion MA 🐝⌛🦋 (@XRboston) June 22, 2019
As Greta Thunberg, the sixteen-year-old Swedish climate campaigner and driving force behind the global student strike movement, has said, “If there really was a crisis this big, then we would rarely talk about anything else. As soon as you turn on the TV, almost everything would be about that: headlines, radio, newspapers. You would almost never hear or read about anything else.”
Just like lawmakers, say Thunberg and her allies, too many major media outlets pay lipservice to the scale of the crisis but then fail to back up that rhetoric with meaningful action or commitments.
“The lack of coverage of the climate crisis is completely unacceptable,” Becca Trabin, a member of Extinction Rebellion organizing team, explained to the Guardian on Saturday. “It’s a public safety crisis on a global scale.”
White nationalism is ‘the greatest threat to American democracy’: Fascism expert
On Thursday's edition of MSNBC's "All In," The Atlantic staff writer and fascism expert Adam Serwer laid out in grim terms the stakes of President Donald Trump's incitement of racist anger against Democratic congresswomen of color.
"From the beginning, we have been haunted by this question: Is America a white man’s republic or a nation for all of its citizens?" said Serwer. "Throughout the last 200-some odd years, the greatest threat to American democracy has always been white nationalism, the defining of American citizenship in racial terms. It almost destroyed the country on multiple occasions. Now President Trump has drawn a line. He has now made it clear that the citizenship of American citizens who are not white is conditional and can be revoked. Quite frankly, there is lots of disagreement between the two political parties. There are lots of issues on which we differ, but this is not a question on which there can actually be disagreement. The choice is now quite clear."
‘A failure in judgment by every single Republican leader’: Ex-GOP congressman scorches Trump’s racism
On Thursday's edition of MSNBC's "All In," former Rep. David Jolly (R-FL) laid into his erstwhile party for its embrace of President Donald Trump's racial hatred and intolerance, as exemplified by the crowd of Trump rallygoers in Greenville, North Carolina chanting "Send Her Back!" of Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN).
"It was heartbreaking," said Jolly, who renounced the Republican Party and became an independent last year. "In terms of what I felt, it was heartbreak, both last night and then to see the likes of Lindsey Graham [(R-SC)] today suggest that the only problem is Omar doesn’t wear a MAGA hat. If refugees would just wear MAGA hats, they could stay. The others deserve to go."
The racist Republican Party must be ‘utterly confronted and destroyed’: Chris Hayes
On Thursday evening, MSNBC's Chris Hayes tore into the Republican Party for accepting and legitimizing the racism of President Donald Trump and his supporters.
"'Send Her Back.' The darkest, ugliest impulses that a political movement can cultivate on full unapologetic display," said Hayes. "That's what Donald Trump has been cultivating all along. Whether the Republican Party likes it or not, it stands for it now. Most of us across the ideological spectrum feel, viscerally, a kind of moral revulsion when we hear and see an angry mob braying 'Send Her Back' about a fellow American. But the reaction from Republicans today was basically a foregone conclusion."