“However you slice it, the rich have been getting richer. Lots richer.”
If wealth inequality in the United States continues to soar at its current rate, the top 10 percent of Americans could own 100 percent of the nation’s net worth by 2052.
That’s according to an analysis by Dallas Morning News finance columnist Scott Burns, who wrote Sunday that the wealthiest Americans “will truly ‘have it all’ just 33 years from now.”
“If they continue to gain share at that rate, they’ll have the remaining 22.8 percent of net worth held by the other 90 percent in just 12 more surveys, give or take an upheaval or two.”
—Scott Burns, Dallas Morning News
“However you slice it, the rich have been getting richer. Lots richer,” wrote Burns, citing Federal Reserve data. “Here are the basics. From 2013 to 2016, the top 10 percent of households increased their share of total wealth from an amazing 75.3 percent to a stunning 77.2 percent. That’s a share gain of 1.87 percent in just three years.”
“If they continue to gain share at that rate,” Burns added, “they’ll have the remaining 22.8 percent of net worth held by the other 90 percent in just 12 more surveys, give or take an upheaval or two.”
Burns’s analysis is just the latest evidence that wealth inequality in the United States, juiced by President Donald Trump’s massive tax cuts for the rich, is reaching unprecedented heights.
In February, University of California, Berkeley economist Gabriel Zucman published researchshowing the top 0.00025 percent—just 400 Americans—owns more wealth than the bottom 150 million Americans.
As Common Dreams reported in June, Matt Bruenig, founder of the left-wing think tank People’s Policy Project, pointed to Federal Reserve data to show that the bottom half of Americans lost $900 billion in wealth between 1989 and 2018.
Over that same period, Bruenig found, “the top one percent increased its total net worth by $21 trillion.”
Prosecutors didn’t believe Lev Parnas claim he wasn’t operating on behalf of Ukraine: CNN
Buried in a piece about the recent revelations that President Donald Trump was recorded demanding someone "take out" former Ukraine Ambassador Yovanovitch, CNN revealed prosecutors don't believe Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas.
"In November, federal prosecutors questioned [Joseph] Bondy about whether his client had been operating on behalf of Ukrainians at the dinner with Trump when Parnas said the ambassador was bad-mouthing the President, according to people familiar with the matter," reported CNN. "On behalf of his client, Bondy rebutted that suggestion, but prosecutors told him they didn't believe Parnas. Bondy declined to comment on any conversations with prosecutors."
GOP senator denies knowing Lev Parnas: ‘Rudy gets around and he has some cosmopolitan friends’
Speaking on Fox News radio earlier this month, Sen. Mike Braun (R-IN) accused Democrats of orchestrating recent revelations from former Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas to come out just as President Trump's impeachment trial kicked off. But Braun's words are coming back to haunt him, thanks to some artful trolling by Parnas's lawyer Joseph Bondy, who posted a photo this Monday of Braun posing with Giuliani and Parnas.
Trump lawyers ‘opened the door’ for him to testify — here are the questions George Conway would ask
Prominent Republican attorney George Conway took to the pages of The Washington Post to lay out the case for why President Donald Trump should testify in his impeachment trial.
"There is an important missing witness in the impeachment of President Trump, and his last name, for all the fulminations of the president’s defenders, isn’t Biden. No, that witness is Trump himself — and the best case for calling him has been established by an argument advanced by the president’s own lawyers," Conway wrote.