In an op-ed for the conservative outlet The Bulwark, Benjamin Parker argues that when it comes to censure as a “compromise” to impeachment, that potential compromise is a model that President Trump himself has taken off the table.
Just like during the Bill Clinton era, party members leading the impeachment effort know that they won’t get the Senate votes to convict. “The censure compromise was an effort by the president’s defenders to end the impeachment process early. It failed in 1998 because Republicans were determined to demonstrate their fidelity to the rule of law and to enforce a high standard of conduct for public officials,” Parker writes, adding that Democrats today find themselves in a similar position. “At this point, Trump’s defenders should be suggesting a censure measure as a possible compromise just as Democrats did in 1998. … Even if a compromise on censure appears unreachable, the Republicans should make the offer on the off chance that it works.”
But according to Parker, Republicans aren’t pushing for censure because President Trump himself has made that impossible. He cites a recent Trump tweet where the president reiterates the claim that his infamous July 25 phone call with Ukraine’s president was “PERFECT.” Additionally, Trump has reportedly told friends that he’s “eager to see Senate Republicans aggressively argue that he did nothing wrong.”
The call to the Ukrainian President was PERFECT. Read the Transcript! There was NOTHING said that was in any way wrong. Republicans, don’t be led into the fools trap of saying it was not perfect, but is not impeachable. No, it is much stronger than that. NOTHING WAS DONE WRONG!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 10, 2019
“Censuring the president would, of course, require admitting that he did something wrong,” Parker writes. “In fact, that’s pretty much the entire point.”
Read his full piece over at The Bulwark.
‘Nobody can leave’: Trapped Wuhan residents stock up
Police at a roadblock on the outskirts of Wuhan turned away cars trying to leave the virus-stricken city on Saturday, as other anxious residents trapped inside spent the Lunar New Year stocking up on masks and medical supplies.
Authorities have prevented anyone from leaving Wuhan, the city of 11 million people at the heart of the viral outbreak which has so far infected nearly 1,300 people and killed 41 others.
AFP saw a steady trickle of cars approaching the roadblocks around 20 kilometres (12 miles) east of the city centre on Saturday morning, only for police in fluorescent jackets wearing masks to tell them to turn around.
Lev Parnas is afraid of Bill Barr — and he should be
Lev Parnas recently told Rachel Maddow that he’s more afraid of Attorney General Bill Barr than he is of the mobbed-up foreign oligarchs he has betrayed. Barr, after all, can weaponize our prisons to punish Parnas.
“Am I scared?” he said. “Yes, because I think I’m more scared of our own Justice Department than these criminals right now.”
Lev Parnas’s lawyer declared ‘open war’ on AG Bill Barr during Maddow interview: attorney
The attorney for Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas appears to be using a novel legal strategy, attorney Luppe Luppen explained on Friday.
Joseph Bondy, the attorney for Parnas, was interviewed Friday evening by Rachel Maddow, following the day's end of the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.
Luppen, who offers legal analysis on his popular @nycsouthpaw Twitter account, came to a conclusion that seemed to surprise him after watching the interview.
"I’ve never seen a lawyer sit on a cable panel show and make that much news," Luppen wrote.