Quantcast
Connect with us

Republicans blundered badly as their own impeachment expert witness wrecked their defenses of Trump: columnist

Published

on

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee pinned their hopes on George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, their sole expert witness on the panel at the hearing on Wednesday, to discredit the impeachment probe into President Donald Trump.

But as anti-Trump conservative columnist Jennifer Rubin wrote for the Washington Post, even Turley’s testimony ended up damaging the GOP more than Democrats, because he undercut one of the GOP’s most solid narratives in defense of the president: that trying to extort Ukraine with military aid would not be impeachable even if it was proven.

ADVERTISEMENT

Turley, wrote Rubin, “did not make an impressive case against impeachment. He blatantly contradicted his position pre-President Trump that a criminal violation was not required for impeachment. Moreover, his main argument, namely that the House was moving too fast, leaves open the question as to whether in a few weeks or a month he might support impeachment.” Moreover, “Turley made some arguments that frankly do leave one wondering why Republicans thought he would be valuable.”

“For example, Turley acknowledged, ‘[Trump’s] call was anything but ‘perfect’ and his reference to the Bidens was highly inappropriate,'” wrote Rubin. “It was highly ‘inappropriate’ because we do not invite foreign governments to investigate political rivals. The ‘ask’ was in and of itself a serious and impeachable act, especially given Trump’s own statements that he will continue to invite foreign meddling.”

“Turley also confessed, ‘The use of military aid for a quid pro quo to investigate one’s political opponent, if proven, can be an impeachable offense,'” wrote Rubin. “And we would assume that conditioning a White House meeting desperately needed by an ally could also be an impeachable act. Well, we had multiple witnesses including Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland testify to precisely that. Experienced prosecutors, I am quite certain, could get a conviction under the criminal standard, beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Turley’s fundamental argument, Rubin continued, also didn’t help Democrats — he argued that the committee cannot proceed without testimony from key witnesses, but that opens the door for Democrats to accuse Trump of obstruction for not allowing those officials to respond to subpoenas, something Turley himself acknowledged was unprecedented. It also opens the door to Democrats impeaching Trump on obstruction now, and continuing the inquiry on bribery to force those officials to testify, which would appear to comply with what Turley argued was the proper standard.

“In short, Republicans once more appear to be their own worst enemies,” concluded Rubin. “If Turley is an example of the type of witnesses they think helpful, perhaps Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) should allow them to call many more.”

ADVERTISEMENT

You can read more here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Lev Parnas’s lawyer declared ‘open war’ on AG Bill Barr during Maddow interview: attorney

Published

on

The attorney for Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas appears to be using a novel legal strategy, attorney Luppe Luppen explained on Friday.

Joseph Bondy, the attorney for Parnas, was interviewed Friday evening by Rachel Maddow, following the day's end of the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.

Luppen, who offers legal analysis on his popular @nycsouthpaw Twitter account, came to a conclusion that seemed to surprise him after watching the interview.

"I’ve never seen a lawyer sit on a cable panel show and make that much news," Luppen wrote.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Democratic prosecutors wrap up case against Trump

Published

on

Democratic prosecutors on Friday wrapped up three days of arguments for seeking Donald Trump's removal from office, as the US president's lawyers prepared to take their turn presenting his defense in the Senate's historic impeachment trial.

For a final eight-hour stretch, the 100 senators listened as Democrats argued that Trump abused the power of the presidency in pressuring Ukraine to launch investigations that would help him politically and then sought to block efforts by Congress to investigate.

Democrats said they had met the burden of proof as they warned Republicans that Trump would remain a grave danger to the nation if left in office.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Give me a break’: Internet unleashes on ‘snowflakes’ Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski for complaint about Schiff

Published

on

CNN's Manu Raju revealed after the Senate adjourned that Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) audibly disputed Rep. Adam Schiff's (D-CA) quotation of a CBS News report threatening senators.

"She shook her head and said, 'No they didn't. No, that's not true,'" Raju reported.

Sens. Tom Cotton (R-AR), Jim Risch (R-ID) Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and John Barrasso also said that the report was false.

https://twitter.com/GriffinConnolly/status/1220891285910892544

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image