Quantcast
Connect with us

‘Trump was caught’: Every major GOP excuse for president’s conduct destroyed by ex-prosecutor

Published

on

Former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade said Thursday’s marathon impeachment hearing left her “shouting” at her television, so she gathered her thoughts and blew up Republican defenses one by one.

McQuade, an MSNBC legal analyst and former U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, exposed the weaknesses in each of the GOP’s sometimes contradictory defenses of President Donald Trump against impeachment by the House of Representatives.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Trump hit the trifecta of impeachable conduct by subverting an election, seeking foreign influence, and putting personal interest ahead of national interest,” McQuade wrote. “And he obstructed Congress by refusing to produce any witnesses or documents.”

Those two allegations form the basis of the two articles of impeachment lawmakers will vote on Friday morning, but McQuade disputed Republican claims that no harm was done because the promised military aid was eventually sent to Ukraine.

“The aid went through only after Trump was caught,” McQuade wrote. “In the meantime, months of delay cost Ukraine lives in its war with Russia. U.S. credibility was harmed and moral authority to fight corruption was eroded.”

ADVERTISEMENT

She demonstrated Trump’s actions meet the standard for bribery, and she argued that abuse of power was indeed an impeachable offense under the Constitution.

“Impeachable conduct may be criminal conduct, but need not be,” McQuade wrote. “A president could be impeached if he watched TV all day and failed to fulfill his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”

Republicans insist Trump holds the authority to ask for investigations, but McQuade argued that he went around the normal procedure for a lawful request as part of a covert operation to subvert the 2020 election.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If this were legitimate investigation, you wouldn’t need to send your personal lawyer and his henchmen to do it,” she wrote. “Witnesses say Trump didn’t want investigation, just announcement of investigation.”

“Trump’s request for a ‘favor’ is strong evidence, corroborated by witness testimony, of months-long scheme to get Zelensky to ‘go to the mic’ and announce Biden probe,” McQuade added. “Aid was leverage.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump was advancing his personal interests, McQuade argued, and not any legitimate public interest by seeking the announcement of an investigation of his political rival.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Trump sought foreign influence in our election and harmed national security by delaying aid designed to fight Russia, our adversary,” she wrote. “We don’t have to accept it. We deserve better.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Lev Parnas’s lawyer declared ‘open war’ on AG Bill Barr during Maddow interview: attorney

Published

on

The attorney for Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas appears to be using a novel legal strategy, attorney Luppe Luppen explained on Friday.

Joseph Bondy, the attorney for Parnas, was interviewed Friday evening by Rachel Maddow, following the day's end of the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump.

Luppen, who offers legal analysis on his popular @nycsouthpaw Twitter account, came to a conclusion that seemed to surprise him after watching the interview.

"I’ve never seen a lawyer sit on a cable panel show and make that much news," Luppen wrote.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Democratic prosecutors wrap up case against Trump

Published

on

Democratic prosecutors on Friday wrapped up three days of arguments for seeking Donald Trump's removal from office, as the US president's lawyers prepared to take their turn presenting his defense in the Senate's historic impeachment trial.

For a final eight-hour stretch, the 100 senators listened as Democrats argued that Trump abused the power of the presidency in pressuring Ukraine to launch investigations that would help him politically and then sought to block efforts by Congress to investigate.

Democrats said they had met the burden of proof as they warned Republicans that Trump would remain a grave danger to the nation if left in office.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Give me a break’: Internet unleashes on ‘snowflakes’ Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski for complaint about Schiff

Published

on

CNN's Manu Raju revealed after the Senate adjourned that Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) audibly disputed Rep. Adam Schiff's (D-CA) quotation of a CBS News report threatening senators.

"She shook her head and said, 'No they didn't. No, that's not true,'" Raju reported.

Sens. Tom Cotton (R-AR), Jim Risch (R-ID) Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and John Barrasso also said that the report was false.

https://twitter.com/GriffinConnolly/status/1220891285910892544

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image