Israel edged closer to a third election within a year Monday as neither the embattled premier Benjamin Netanyahu nor his main rival appeared close to forming a government two days before a deadline.
Right-winger Netanyahu and former army general Benny Gantz, who leads the centrist Blue and White alliance, traded blame over the impasse ahead of Wednesday, the last opportunity to form a coalition and avoid fresh polls.
A new election would be a repeat of September’s deadlocked vote, which in itself was a response to inconclusive April polls, and would further deepen the political turmoil in the Jewish state.
“We made offer after offer and got nothing. Nada,” Netanyahu said Sunday at a conference organised by a conservative Israeli newspaper. “Blue and White did not budge a milimetre.”
The two parties have been discussing forming a unity coalition but Gantz has rejected serving under Netanyahu, pointing to his indictment on a string of corruption charges.
“People think that acts of corruption can be forgiven because of one political circumstance or another,” Gantz told the same conference. “The support of the people who want to protect the prime minister causes them to be blind.”
Following the inconclusive elections in September, both Netanyahu and Gantz were given 28-day periods to try and negotiate a workable coalition in Israel’s proportional political system.
Neither was able to get the support of more than half of the 120-seat Knesset, or parliament.
– Down to the wire –
President Reuven Rivlin then turned to parliament in the hope of avoiding an unpopular election.
But the 21-day period he granted parliament to find a suitable candidate expires at 11:59 pm (2159 GMT) on Wednesday.
If nothing changes by then, new polls will be called for, most likely to be held in March.
Theoretically any member of parliament could try and gain the necessary support, but Netanyahu and Gantz remain the only realistic contenders.
A last-minute deal could still be reached with the help of a kingmaker in a political system where such battles often go down to the wire.
Avigdor Lieberman, whose secular nationalist Yisrael Beitenu party has eight seats and holds the balance of power, could decide to throw his support behind either bloc.
He has so far refused to back either, accusing Gantz of being reliant on the support of Israel’s Arab minority and Netanyahu of being at the whim of ultra-Orthodox Jewish parties.
He prefers a unity government, but weeks of talks have faltered.
Most Israeli media Monday reported little movement in the negotiations, setting the stage for new elections.
– Internal challenge –
Netanyahu’s political problems are intertwined with his legal woes — Israel’s attorney general last month indicted him for bribery, fraud and breach of trust.
He strongly denies the allegations and accuses the country’s media, police and prosecution of a witchhunt.
No date has yet been set for the beginning of the proceedings.
Under Israeli law Netanyahu, the country’s longest serving prime minister, can remain in office despite an indictment.
A new poll Monday by Israel’s public broadcaster Kan found that Netanyahu’s Likud and Blue and White would again be deadlocked if elections were held today.
But if they do take place, Netanyahu might face yet another battle — this time over the leadership of Likud.
Gideon Saar, a rival within the party, has called for a primary vote before any new election, though no decision has been taken yet on the idea.
On Sunday, both Saar and Netanyahu spoke at a closed-door meeting of Likud’s central committee attended by around 800 people.
According to sources within the meeting cited by Israeli press, Saar received a warm welcome from his supporters but shouts of “traitor” from Netanyahu backers.
Saar later posted a video on his Facebook page of supporters chanting his name at the event.
“The attempts to delegitimize and besmirch those who seek to run (against Netanyahu) are against the Likud’s democratic spirit,” he told the crowd.
“A democratic competition strengthens the movement.”
© 2019 AFP
These global banks defy sanctions and send trillions to terrorists and criminals — and the Justice Department lets them
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists revealed in a shocking expose that international banks are skirting U.S. sanctions and allowing trillions of dollars to flow to terrorists, criminals and oligarchs.
In a Sunday report, the ICIJ called out JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, Standard Chartered Bank, Deutsche Bank and Bank of New York Mellon for refusing to comply with American sanctions, U.S. government documents reveal.
Other banks have even defied money laundering crackdowns, the report said and allowed "staggering sums of illicit cash" to flow from shady characters and criminal networks.
‘He truly despises Black women’: Cohen walks through Trump’s outright ‘hatred’ for women of color
It has become clear to anyone paying attention that President Donald Trump has serious problems with people of color. But his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, revealed that it goes much deeper.
"Trump is a racist white supremacist" is a story that may as well be "water is wet," but Cohen explained Sunday in an interview with MSNBC's Al Sharpton that Trump has a particular issue with women of color.
"The fact is, as much as he has a disdain for Black people, he truly despises Black women because he doesn't know how to handle them," Cohen said. "He doesn't know what to do."
At a rally on Friday in Minnesota, Sharpton noted the "mostly white" crowd was one that Trump heralded for having "good genes," meaning white genes.
All of the Republican hypocrites who said they opposed a new Supreme Court Justice in 2016
Republicans have been criticized for their hypocrisy over the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her replacement compared to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016.
PBS News gathered what all Republicans have said about whether the president in 2016 should have the right to appoint a justice at that time. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, these Republicans are having their own words brought back and questioning why the rules are different for Democrats.