DETROIT — Defense lawyers late Wednesday asked a judge for a 90-day delay of next month's trial of five men accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, saying they need more time to prepare and investigate the conduct of FBI agents who thwarted the alleged conspiracy. The request comes five weeks before the Oct. 12 trial in federal court in Grand Rapids, one of the most closely watched cases involving alleged violent extremism in the country. Prosecutors say the accused plotters were driven by anger over state restrictions on travel and business during the COVID-19 pandemic. ...
Republicans in Texas were slammed in a hard-hitting editorial by the Houston Chronicle for redrawing political maps in a manner likely to keep Democrats from having any representation in Galveston County.
The new maps for Galveston, which is a suburb Houston, redrew Precinct 3. The district has been served by Commissioner Stephen Holmes for over two decades.
"Holmes is the lone Democrat and only person of color on the court. Precinct 3 is currently about two-thirds Black and Latino, but under the new configuration, people of color will make up only a quarter of the voters," the newspaper reported.
This was not the county's first brush with scandal while redistricting.
"Galveston County has been through this before. A decade ago, the U.S. Department of Justice rejected its Republican-drawn maps before they were put into effect, finding they diluted minority voting power," the newspaper reported. "What’s different this time, though, is the county is not required to submit its maps ahead of time for the DOJ to review any impact on minority voting rights."
The critical section of the law was struck down in 2013.
"Why did the Galveston County commissioners redraw Holmes’ district? Was it to dilute minority voting power? Or were they just determined to drive out dissent by a Democrat? We can only guess, because the commissioners didn’t respond to our requests for comment," the editorial board wrote.
Dr. Mehmet Oz, considered by popular media to be a TV personality "quack," has flip-flopped once again on his stance regarding abortion and a woman's right to choose.
“There are electrical exchanges at six weeks, but the heart’s not beating,” Oz said in a 2019 interview with the Breakfast Club radio show. “If you’re going to define life by a beating heart, then make it a beating heart, not little electrical exchanges in the cell that no one would hear or think about as a heart."
Oz said at the time that he "didn't quite get" asking women to "decide almost instantaneously if they’re pregnant or not" and that abortion "is a hard issue for everybody." On a personal level, though, he "disliked" abortion and wouldn't want his family members to have one. His "personal level" pro-choice position in 2019 still left room for women to make their own decisions about their bodies, however, saying he would not want to “interfere with everyone else’s stuff because it’s hard enough to get into life as it is.”
Jump to 2021 and Oz had a slightly different response to his statement made two years prior during a campaign stop with WGAL in Lancaster, Penn. Oz said he was “okay with the Supreme Court making the right decision” on Roe v. Wade, “based on what they think the Constitution says.”
Oz said he believes liberals and conservatives are different “partly for genetic reasons.”
“Liberals primarily view freedom and the right to do what’s important to them as their primary drivers," he said. "Conservatives tend to use other factors in addition. For example, you don’t want people pissing in your neighborhood—that’s much more important to conservatives."
Watch the video below.
Dr. Oz Talks CBD Benefits, Hallucinogens & Why You Shouldn't Wash Your Chicken www.youtube.com
The United States will impose "severe economic harm" on Russia and boost its military presence in Eastern Europe should Moscow invade Ukraine, the White House warned Monday, laying out the high stakes on the eve of talks between Joe Biden and Vladimir Putin.
Ahead of his virtual meeting with Putin, Biden also spoke with the leaders of France, Germany, Italy and Britain on Monday, after which the western powers expressed their "determination" that Ukraine's sovereignty be respected.
The US president will also quickly inform his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky of the details of his discussion with Putin, taking place by videoconference Tuesday, as tens of thousands of Russian troops were positioned near the Ukraine border, a senior US official told reporters.
The official said the White House does not know if Putin has made a decision to launch his military forces against Ukraine -- and stopped short of threatening direct intervention of American military force should he do so.
But Biden will make clear that there "will be genuine and meaningful and enduring costs to choosing to go forward should (Russia) choose to go forward with a military escalation," the official said, on grounds of anonymity.
The United States and European allies are prepared to take "substantial economic countermeasures... that would impose significant and severe economic harm on the Russian economy" if Russia attacks, the official said.
In addition, Biden will make clear that if Putin "moved in, there would be an increasing request from eastern flank allies and a positive response from the United States for additional forces and capabilities and exercises," they said.
The White House said in a statement after Biden's talks with European leaders that the group "called on Russia to de-escalate tensions and agreed that diplomacy... is the only way forward to resolve the conflict in Donbas."
Underscoring the close coordination between Washington and Kiev, the US official said Secretary of State Antony Blinken would also talk to Zelensky before the meeting with Putin.
Ukraine has estimated that Russia has around 100,000 troops near its border.
Moscow denies any bellicose intentions and accuses the West of provocation, particularly with military exercises in the Black Sea, which it sees as part of its sphere of influence.
And Putin wants a promise from the West that Ukraine would not become a part of NATO, the transatlantic alliance created to confront the former Soviet Union.
Asked if the United States was prepared to send troops into Ukraine if Russia attacks, the official said Washington is "not seeking to end up in a circumstance in which the focus of our countermeasures is the direct use of American military force."
Such talk, the official added, "would be precipitous conflict saber-rattling, and we'd prefer to keep those communications with the Russians private."
The Pentagon made clear it was taking the Russian troop buildup as a serious threat.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin "did chair a meeting this morning with key departmental leaders, including the Chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and General (Tod) Wolters out at EUCom (the US European Command) to discuss the situation in Ukraine and of course, in western Russia," Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said Monday.
"He is staying very keenly and closely informed by senior military and policy leaders here at the department about what we continue to see," Kirby said.
The Kremlin said earlier Monday that Moscow is not expecting "breakthroughs" from the call.
"Although our bilateral relations are still in a very sad state, there is still a revival; dialogue is beginning in some areas," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.
State Department spokesman Ned Price said that the United States still believes that the Minsk agreements between Russia and the West on implementing a ceasefire in Ukraine's war with pro-Russia separatists were possible.
"We believe there is an opportunity, a window before us to resolve this diplomatically," Price said.
But if Russia does not show interest in that, he said, the United States is prepared to apply "high-impact economic measures that we've refrained from using in the past."