Google is making a fortune by selling users’ personal information despite the company’s pledge that it never sells the data, a lawsuit filed this week claims. “Google promises its hundreds of millions of users that it ‘will never sell any personal information to third parties’ and ‘you get to decide how your information is used.’ These promises are false,” the lawsuit claims, quoting a 2019 New York Times op-ed by Google CEO Sundar Pichai. “In fact, Google monitors its consumers’ digital footprint, then makes billions of dollars by selling their sensitive personal information.” The suit also c...
Stories Chosen For You
Legal experts: Trump's attempt to whitewash his call to 'terminate' the Constitution only makes it worse
Lawrence O'Donnell began his Monday night show highlighting Donald. Trump's recent flub on his personal social media site in which he advocates terminating all rules and laws, even those in the Constitution just to make him president after losing in 2020.
Among the problems that O'Donnell saw in Trump's post, other than the obvious political and PR disaster that has followed, is that it would give a prosecutor in the Jan. 6 case the option to ask if Trump ever advocated terminating the Constitution. Since the post, Trump has tried to clean up the comments, but ultimately, the post is still live, and he ultimately doubled down on the idea using different words.
Speaking to O'Donnell was former FBI general counsel Andrew Weissmann and Rep.-elect Daniel Goldman (D-NY), who previously served as a House impeachment lawyer. Both men explained that Trump's slip
"One of the things that immediately struck me is that Donald Trump is not alone and isolated on his social media platform," said Goldman. "He remains the leader of the Republican Party and the vast majority of the Republicans in the House of Representatives still pay fealty to him. And so we are really left, Republicans especially are left, with a very simple question: Do you believe in democracy or do you believe in Donald Trump? There is no other way around it. Certainly, we have been saying this in many variations over the last several years, but he put it so starkly in that social media post."
He went on to note that the "smoking gun" never happens in an investigation. What Trump has done is made more admissions against his own interest than any defendant he's ever seen in his legal career. All of those statements are admissible in court.
"To me," Weissman began. "This is something that the government is going to argue pretty forcefully that it is going to come in as an admission. That is, when you are a defendant, your prior statements, if they are relevant and probative of something, they come into evidence as an admission, even if you never take the stand."
He explained that if Trump was to take the stand in his own defense, a question like that could be asked, but the statement alone is enough to flash it up on a screen for a jury to mull.
"This is somebody that is lawless," Weissmann continued. "What is going on is as the facts and law are creeping together and holding him to account, you see people like Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Sydney Powell, all scurrying around trying to say that either the law is wrong or the facts do not matter, or they are not what they say there are. But you feel this noose tightening as you see each of them being held to account, and I would say finally being held to account. I think the statement, frankly, only got worse when Donald Trump tried to whitewash it. Both of those things come in, in other words exactly what you said Lawrence, would be played out in court, to say this is really damning evidence, and he knows it as he then tries to deny that he said it."
See the full discussion below:
Did Trump just screw himself again? www.youtube.com
Despite major tech layoffs and ongoing fears of a recession, unemployment in the US remains low. In the long term, businesses are likely to continue to struggle to fill positions. That creates an opportunity for unions. And there are encouraging signs that workers are seizing the moment.
There’s no doubt that the economy is slowing, with ugly consequences for some workers. Tech companies have been laying off employees at a brutal rate. Amazon plans to lay off about 10,000 workers. Hewlett-Packard has announced plans to lay off 4,000 to 5,000 people in the next few years.
NBC estimates tech layoffs this year could hit more than 137,000.
READ MORE: Know thine enemy: Time to strike
Higher interest rates and a slowing job market contributed to a 3.7 percent unemployment rate in October, higher than the 3.5 percent estimate.
The good news is that the non-farm economy still gained 261,000 jobs in October, higher than the estimated 205,000, and barely down from 263,000 in November. Overall, the economy grew faster than expected in the third quarter. Relatively low unemployment seems likely to continue in the long term, despite short-term variations.
There are two reasons for that.
An aging workforce and falling immigration.
The median baby boomer turned 65 in 2022, and the pandemic has encouraged retirements. In the third quarter of 2021, 66.9 percent of people between 65 and 74 were retired, up from only 64 percent in the same quarter of 2019.
Economists thought that some of these retirees might return to the workforce, but that hasn’t really happened. Instead, retirements have continued high, contributing to workplace shortages.
Net migration to the US has collapsed simultaneously thanks to Trump era restrictions and the pandemic. Net migration to the US in 2021 was the lowest in decades. Only 247,000 people were added to the US population through immigration, in comparison to 568,000 in 2019 and more than 1 million in 2016.
According to one estimate, the US has a deficit of 1.4 million immigrant workers relative to pre-pandemic trends.
Little wonder, then, that US employers have struggled to fill positions, even as covid restrictions have largely ended. Some industries do have a surplus of workers now, like construction and mining. But others, like hospitality, education and health care, continue to have widespread vacancies.
In the first nine months of fiscal year 2022 (October to June), union election petitions were up 58 percent over the same period in 2021.
Moreover, unions won 641 of those elections—the highest number of union victories since 2005. The win rate of elections has been 76.6 percent, as high as any success rate since 2000.
Not coincidentally, the industries where employers need more workers are also industries that have seen an increase in worker organizing.
The single company contributing most to unionization success is Starbucks. The first three Starbucks stores filed union election petitions in August 2021. In the next eight months, almost 250 stores followed suit.
Traditionally, food and drink retailers like Starbucks have had dismally low union participation. In 2021, 1.2 percent of workers in the sector were unionized, according to the US Labor Department.
An NPR analysis found that 10 years ago only 4 percent of union election petitions came from the accommodations and food service industry. In the beginning of 2022, in comparison, the sector was responsible for 27.5 percent of union election petitions.
Starbucks workers have organized heroically in the face of a vicious union-busting campaign by CEO Howard Shultz. Among other tactics, Shultz is accused of illegally boosting benefits and wages, but only for non-union employees.
Pandemic disruptions to higher education also gave graduate students and adjuncts more leverage in dealing with university employers. In 2020, four universities signed contracts with graduate student unions, doubling the total number of private institutions with union agreements.
These successes helped to boost a long-term trend. Over the last 10 years, faculty union chapters at private schools have increased by 80 percent.
This month 48,000 academic workers at the University of California declared a strike that has entered its third week as they call for better pay, benefits and job security. The strike includes postdoctoral scholars, teaching assistants and graduate students, and has disrupted classes and laboratories.
A new day for labor
Wages have been stagnant for four decades in the US. Suddenly workers are at a premium, but wage growth continues to lag inflation. It’s no wonder that workers are using their greater power to unionize.
Unionization is a solid strategy for raising stagnant wages. Non-union workers make only 83 percent of unionized weekly earning. But unions ultimately raise wages for all workers.
One report estimated that the decline in unionization from 1979 to 2017 cost the average worker the equivalent of $3,250 a year. Deunionization depresses the wages of middle-wage earners more than those of high-wage earners, and so contributed to the 23-point growth in the wage gap between high and middle earners over the same period.
If the US moves back toward higher union concentration, it will move toward a stronger, more affluent middle class, and less inequality.
The business class and rightwing politicians oppose this. President Biden tried to get a bill through Congress allowing the National Labor Relations Board to fine labor law violators this year. It passed the House, but Republicans and conservative Democrats in the Senate killed it.
But the long-term trend of labor shortages in key industries, and organizing momentum in new sectors, is a promising development.
If we’re lucky, we may be at the beginning of a new era of labor power.
Republican senator mocks Trump as a 'RINO' after advocating for the 'termination' of the Constitution
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) borrowed one of Donald Trump's favorite insults to needle him on Monday after his rant declaring the Constitution of the United States be terminated so he could be president after losing in 2020.
“Well, the Republican Party is the Constitution party,” Romney told Capitol Hill reporters, the Huffington Post reported Monday. “So when he calls to suspend the Constitution, he goes from being MAGA to being RINO.”
Trump has long used the term "RINO" — meaning "Republican In Name Only" — to attack anyone who doesn't like him or opposes his actions, but who is a member of his own party.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) spent three days dodging questions about Trump's dinner with Nazis, but this time around he posted on social media that the comments about terminating the Constitution were “not a responsible thing to say.”
“I don’t know why anybody would say something like that; certainly not an ex-president. I just think it’s irresponsible,” Cornyn tweeted.
Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) thinks the whole rant was “a Hail Mary to maintain some hope when everybody knows it’s not the case. We’re the party of the Constitution; it’s not going to happen.”
Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) was happier to go much further, now that he's leaving public office. Giving a message to his GOP colleagues, Sasse said they “are going to have to choose if they’re for the circus clown or if they’re for the Constitution.”
Others like those who claim to be "constitutional conservatives" offered polite refusal, but fell short of being brave enough to stand up to Donald Trump.