'Word Salad': Legal expert says Alina Habba is speaking 'gibberish' while defending Trump

Alina Habba's latest talking points were purportedly pure mishmash.

Former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner diced up Trump's attorney for what he called a "bunch of word salad" for being unable to express a cogent point while pushing back against the narrative that her client, former President Donald Trump, is cash-strapped and boxed in after a New York City judge ruled against him in the damning civil fraud case that will force him to pay $455 million in penalties.

"The Attorney General [Letitia James] case is on appeal, we're waiting on that decision," she said during an interview with Eric Bolling on Newsmax. "We had a good hearing last week on that case."

ALSO READ: ‘We're wounded:’ Speaker Mike Johnson struggles to lead GOP after ‘unnecessary purging’

"Obviously, the judge in the appellate division saw that there were some issues in the order and rectified them."

Trump's lawyers have filed appeals accusing Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron of having "committed errors of law and/or fact" and claiming he abused his discretion or "acted in excess" of his jurisdiction.

Habba noted that she believed that the appellate effort is "going to be very strong" and that "we have a good record for appeal we know that there were decisions that were made in error" speaking to the narrowed statute of limitations

She then made the claim that after the trial and now in the appeal stage that "it's time to let our side come out."

Kirschner knocked Habba for her suggestion that Trump and his team have seemingly been muzzled all this time until now.

"I especially like when she says well 'Our story is finally going to come out!' They have been putting their story out in the media, they have been putting their story out in trials that lasted weeks if not months — but now on appeal their story is finally going to come out it's a bunch of word salad it's a bunch of gibberish."

"They do not have strong issues on appeal based on my assessment what I saw regarding the reporting of the evidence that was introduced that ended up in the massive money judgment against Donald Trump."

Kirschner conceded "there were some issues" that the appellate court harped on including putting on hold instead of cancelling Trump's business licenses and also bringing up charges that dated back before 2014.

Engoron notably permitted some of the evidence in court stating “the statute of limitations bars claims, not evidence.”

Kirschner added that "here have been some issues that have kicked around" but stressed "these are very minor issues as compared to the massive money judgment that Donald Trump is facing which he has still not been able to post a bond in order to take a proper appeal."

Watch below or click the link.