Legal scholars warn of constitutional dangers in Trump's national emergency election plan
FILE PHOTO: President Donald Trump speaks with White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Secretary of State Marco Rubio during military operations in Iran, at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, on February 28 (The White House/Social Media/Handout via REUTERS)
Legal experts expressed alarm Thursday as the Trump administration circulated a draft executive order that would federalize the U.S. election process during declared national emergencies.
The Washington Post reported on the initiative, which Lawfare senior editors Anna Bower and Molly Roberts characterized as having a legally questionable foundation, though they warned that "bits and pieces" could still become law.
Bower and Roberts noted the administration views national emergency declarations related to national security as a potential mechanism to exert greater control over elections. The Iran war provides a possible justification for invoking such authority, as the FBI has warned of potential Iranian drone attacks on U.S. soil in retaliation for American and Israeli bombing.
Legal experts questioned the constitutional viability of the proposed order while acknowledging the administration has identified sufficient legal authorities to potentially implement portions of the plan.