Go ahead and enjoy fashion a little
November 08, 2008
I'm a little hostile to the automatic dismissal that fashion gets as shamefully lightweight, because it seems to me that it's more demonizing of the feminine. No one is wondering if it sends the wrong message to be interested in a male politician's interest in sports. We're not worried that seeming too masculine will make politicians seem like lightweights, even though it totally did in Bush's case, because it was so obviously a series of costumes for him. We mourn that women feel they have to dress up all the time, and it's true that it's a giant bummer for women who are disinterested in that. But I also feel bad for those who would like to experiment with fashion, roll themselves out as sharply dressed, but can't because it seems unserious or emasculated. As I've said before, I think that the more feminism penetrates the public consciousness, we're going to see women give up a lot of habits that are just time-consuming and/or uncomfortable, but we'll see men pick up more.
In fact, you can already see changes. Women wear less make-up than they did when I was younger, and painting your nails is increasingly being seen as an affectation for the few, instead of standard for the many. And wearing underwear that doubles as scaffolding is out of style. Honestly, Michelle Obama's style reflects certain changes---as good as she looks, she also dresses very simply. At the same time, I'm seeing that men are more interested in being well-shaven and wearing nicer clothes. Maybe in my lifetime we'll actually see the standards for the sexes meet somewhere in the middle, with a lot more flexibility for personal preference.