A prominent former U.S. State Department official who worked to fight Russian disinformation has labeled the Trump presidential campaign an “influence operation,” with several experts echoing his assessment.
Richard Stengel, an NBC News/MSNBC analyst who spent seven years as TIME magazine managing editor and served as the chief executive of the National Constitution Center, on Thursday shared his evaluation.
"The Trump candidacy is not so much a political campaign as what intelligence services call an influence operation, a coordinated effort to use mis-and-disinformation to undermine democratic institutions and processes," declared Stengel.
Stengel, who served as U.S. Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, is the author of the 2019 memoir, "Information Wars: How We Lost the Global Battle Against Disinformation and What We Can Do About It."
READ MORE: ‘Trafficking in Nazi Race Science’: Trump Blasted After ‘Vile Trifecta’ of Antisemitism
Stengel's comment received hundreds of thousands of views on social media, and garnered responses from experts.
"This is correct," replied Ruth Ben-Ghiat, the well-known professor of history and an expert on fascism, authoritarians, propaganda, and democracy.
"True," asserted Eric Chenoweth, Director of the Institute for Democracy in Eastern Europe, adding, "it is correlated with Russian influence operations."
"The Trump effort has the support of his BFF Putin, who has paid agents in the US as social 'influencers' to help promote Russia's pro-Trump narrative," noted former U.S. Ambassador to Kosovo, Greg Delawie.
Indeed, early last month the U.S. Dept. of Justice announced it had seized "32 internet domains used in Russian government-directed foreign malign influence campaigns," which "used these domains, among others, to covertly spread Russian government propaganda with the aim of reducing international support for Ukraine, bolstering pro-Russian policies and interests, and influencing voters in U.S. and foreign elections, including the U.S. 2024 Presidential Election."
Days later, MSNBC's Ja'han Jones reported, "MAGA influencers are scrambling after the DOJ's Russia indictment," and mentioned "an unsealed affidavit ... alleging a Kremlin-backed agency had nearly 600 U.S.-based influencers in its sights as it waged an online-based election manipulation operation in the United States."
The Washington Spectator's Dave Troy, an investigative journalist and tech entrepreneur who has written extensively on Russia and Russian President Vladimir Putin, responded to Stengel's post: "Yes. And this would have been a very cool thing for the Obama administration to say in 2015-2016."
Dr. Joanne Freeman, a professor of American history and of American studies, replied to Stengel's post with a simple "YUP."
Stengel's pronouncement wasn't so much a revelation as a reminder.
READ MORE: Trump Stands Silently for ‘God Bless the USA’ Then Trashes Detroit to Detroit Economic Club
Earlier this week, David Corn, Mother Jones' Washington bureau chief and co-author of "Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump," penned an important piece titled: "Trump Is Running a Disinformation Campaign, Not a Political Campaign."
"He’s not just lying. He’s creating an alternative reality," Corn states. "His campaign is a full-fledged project to pervert how Americans view the nation and the world, an extensive propaganda campaign designed to fire up fears and intensify anxieties that Trump can then exploit to collect votes. And the political media world has yet to come to terms with the fact that Trump is heading a disinformation crusade more likely to be found in an authoritarian state than a vibrant democracy. This is unlike other presidential campaigns in modern American history—other than his own previous efforts."
Even before Donald Trump left the White House in disgrace in January of 2021, experts were busy analyzing just how damaging his time on office then had been.
The day after the November 2020 election which Trump ultimately lost but falsely had declared victory, The Washington Post's Dan Balz wrote: "Trump has attacked democracy’s institutions, but never so blatantly as he did overnight."
"For four years, President Trump has sought to undermine the institutions of a democratic society, but never so blatantly as in the early morning hours of Wednesday. His attempt to falsely claim victory and to subvert the election itself by calling for a halt to vote-counting represents the gravest of threats to the stability of the country," Balz wrote. "A president who respected the Constitution would let things play out. But Trump has shown once again he cares not about the Constitution or the stability and well-being of the country or anything like that. He cares only about himself and retaining the powers he now holds. And so he cries “fraud” when there is no evidence whatsoever of any such thing."
The Niskanen Center, a D.C. think tank, one week before the violent and deadly January 6, 2021 insurrection Trump allegedly incited, asked: "How Much Did Trump Undermine U.S. Democracy?"
READ MORE: ‘Sick’: Dem Mom Who Lost Son to Gun Violence Horrified to See Herself in Anti-Harris Ad