Sneak move poised to hand Trump even scarier power

At its deepest level, government is a moral force grounded in a moral view of the world.

It may not comport with morality as most of us view it. The Saudi oppression of women, the Russian violence against the queer community, and the Iranian brutal suppression of that nation’s democracy movement are all examples of things most Americans consider immoral.

But each is grounded in a particular moral worldview that those governments and their leaders have adopted.

While America has experienced many dark moral episodes throughout our history, we’ve always held or at least espoused a basic set of moral principles:

• That all people are born equal under the law, and that power should flow up from the people rather than down from elected leaders
• That a free press, free speech, and freedom from religion are essential to liberty
• That defending the basic rights of all people to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” is the core function of a democratic republic

Until now.

Republicans in the House of Representatives just inserted into their must-pass “Big, Beautiful” multi-trillion-dollar-tax-break-for-billionaires legislation a provision that would enable the president to designate any nonprofit — from Harvard to the American Civil Liberties Union to your local Democratic party — a “terrorist-supporting organization” that then loses their tax-exempt status, effectively putting them out of business.

And who decides who gets that designation? The president. And he gets do to it in secret.

This is exactly how both Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbán first destroyed dissent and free speech in Russia and Hungary.

Trump has been pursuing this for a decade, from his trying to designate Antifa as a “terrorist organization” to his attacks on our universities to his use of Stalin’s phrase “enemy of the people” to describe journalists and opinion writers like me.

One level above these core democratic principles — of free speech, the right to protest, and the power of the people in free and fair elections to change our leadership — are two major reformations that came about after major national upheavals.

The first was after the Civil War, when the nation (at least in principle) embraced the humanity and citizenship of nonwhite people with Reconstruction and the 13th through the 15th Amendments to the Constitution. The second was during the Republican Great Depression, when FDR rebooted our republic to become the supporter of last resort for the working class, producing the world’s first more-than-half-of-us middle class.

Now Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and their cabal of rightwing billionaires are trying to dissolve virtually all of this, replacing it with the sort of “illiberal democracy” we see in Russia and Hungary, where there are still elections (but their outcome is pre-determined), still legal protections for the press and free speech (but only when that speech doesn’t challenge those in power), and only the wealthy can truly enjoy safety and security.

After the Saudi, Emirati, and Qatari governments each gave the Trump family massive gifts in the form of billion-dollar development and Trump hotel or golf course licensing deals, Trump made a speech in which he abandoned our 250-year history of advocating democracy around the world.

Of course, as mentioned, we’ve often failed at that mission in the past. Reagan’s support for the death squads in Central America haunt our southern border to this day; Eisenhower’s embrace of the Shah of Iran still rattles the Middle East; and Nixon’s tolerance of Chinese brutality led us, in the name of capitalism, to help that nation’s communist leaders create the most powerful and medieval surveillance state in world history.

But these exceptions prove the rule: when we abandon our own stated principles in foreign relations, those first laid out in our Declaration of Independence and Constitution, the results are almost uniformly bad for us, for them, and for democracy around the world. And it becomes even more destructive when this administration rejects American values as it embraces bribes from foreign dictators, harasses journalists, imprisons op-ed writers, and threatens judges.

This issue of morality in government has been at the core of our political debate for centuries. President Harry Truman was explicit about it way back in 1952:

“Now, I want to say something very important to you about this issue of morality in government.

“I stand for honest government… To me, morality in government means more than a mere absence of wrongdoing. It means a government that is fair to all. I think it is just as immoral for the Congress to enact special tax favors into law as it is for a tax official to connive in a crooked tax return. It is just as immoral to use the lawmaking power of the Government to enrich the few at the expense of the many, as it is to steal money from the public treasury. That is stealing money from the public treasury. …

“Legislation that favored the greed of monopoly and the trickery of Wall Street was a form of corruption that did the country four times as much harm as Teapot Dome ever did.Private selfish interests are always trying to corrupt the Government in this way. Powerful financial groups are always trying to get favors for themselves.”

Tragically, for both America and democracy around the world, this is not how Trump was raised and does not comport with the GOP’s current worldview. Fred Trump built a real estate empire through racism, fraud, and deceit. He raised Donald to view every transaction as necessarily win/lose, every rule or regulation as something to get around, and every government official as somebody to be influenced with threats or money.

The GOP embraced a similar worldview with the Reagan Revolution as former Labor Secretary Robert Reich notes in his must-read Substack newsletter:

“But starting with Reagan, America went off the rails. Deregulation, privatization, free trade, wild gambling by Wall Street, union-busting, record levels of inequality, near-stagnant wages for most, staggering wealth for a few, big money taking over our politics.

“Stock buybacks and the well-being of investors became more important than good jobs with good wages. Corporate profits more important than the common good.”

Greed is a type of moral stance. It’s not one that open, pluralistic, democratic societies embrace beyond their tolerance of regulated capitalism, but it is a position that expresses a certain type of morality, one most famously expounded by David Koch and Ayn Rand.

It’s inconsistent with the history of humanity itself, as I document in detail in The Hidden History of American Democracy: Rediscovering Humanity’s Ancient Way of Living. From Margaret Mead pointing out how healed leg bones in hundred-thousand-year-old skeletons show that ancient societies cared for their wounded to the ways Native American tribes dealt with people who stole or hoarded even without the use of police or prisons, the triumph of greed has historically been the exception rather the rule.

When Trump said, “My whole life I’ve been greedy,” it was one of the few honest bits of self-appraisal he’s ever tendered. And it should have warned all of us.

Greed and hunger for power are, ultimately, anathema to our traditional American values.

And it’s high time we began to say so, and to teach our children the difference between a moral nation that protects its weakest citizens while promoting democracy around the world and an “illiberal democracy” like Russia, Hungary, and the vision of today’s GOP.

We’ve been better than this in the past, and it’s high time we return to those moral positions that truly made America great.