Donald Trump's voter base is starting to turn on him as his biggest supporters question his reasoning for a potential invasion of a foreign ally.
The president made it clear that he wanted to take the Kingdom of Denmark's territory of Greenland in a move that would allegedly bolster national security. Natural mineral deposits have also been cited as a reason for the Trump administration's interest by some political commentators.
Those who voted for Trump in the 2024 election believe the president has no right to threaten military action against the country, and that the administration should not interfere in Greenland. A collection of Trump voters, speaking to the New York Times, voiced their opposition to the administration's continued push for territory.
Heather, a 55-year-old Republican, said that the administration's actions in Venezuela are understandable but there is no need for Greenland to be in the conversation. She said, "In Venezuela, we need to go in and not just take him [President Nicolás Maduro] out. We need to get rid of his entire cabinet, everybody that was underneath him that is following in his footsteps and start afresh."
"But also, Venezuela is hopefully more for the people’s sake, to end the suffering for them. Greenland just seems more of a – why are we there? What do we need from Greenland? I mean, there’s no conflict there. Can we just bring the focus back to somewhere else in America?"
Fellow Republican voter Bill, 62, suggested there was an argument to be made for the natural resources on Greenland but that a want for those did not give Trump a right to use the military against the country. He said, "Greenland has resources that Trump wants to be able to take advantage of. But what gives him the right to go in militarily and take it?"
Daniel,. 54, says there is an obvious comparison between Trump's threats to Greenland and what Putin is "doing to Ukraine." He added, "What gives him the right to do that as well? So it just doesn't feel right. It's a negative impact, I believe, on the United States."
Bill added, "And if he does go into Greenland with force, if you read today’s news, they talk about how all of the NATO countries over there are not happy with that. That could spell the end of NATO."
Trump, in a recent post to Truth Social, reiterated the US needs Greenland "for the purpose of National Security. It is vital for the Golden Dome that we are building."